From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dma-buf: Add selftests for dma-fence
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 14:30:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUk9G22rDfUrX3CZ=st3_bSehyaW_URtCk0ZfJqFTmLuQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi Chris,
When running the new dmabuf-selftests on two different systems, I get:
dma-buf: Running sanitycheck
dma-buf: Running dma_fence
sizeof(dma_fence)=48
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/sanitycheck
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_signaling
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_add_callback
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_late_add_callback
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_rm_callback
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_late_rm_callback
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_status
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_error
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_wait
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_wait_timeout
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_stub
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/race_signal_callback
thread_signal_callback[0] completed 28855 passes, 3929 misses
thread_signal_callback[1] completed 28846 passes, 3918 misses
thread_signal_callback[0] completed 37179 passes, 37179 misses
thread_signal_callback[1] completed 37184 passes, 37183 misses
and
dma-buf: Running sanitycheck
dma-buf: Running dma_fence
sizeof(dma_fence)=64
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/sanitycheck
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_signaling
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_add_callback
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_late_add_callback
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_rm_callback
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_late_rm_callback
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_status
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_error
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_wait
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_wait_timeout
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_stub
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/race_signal_callback
thread_signal_callback[0] completed 3423 passes, 2148 misses
thread_signal_callback[1] completed 2360 passes, 9 misses
thread_signal_callback[0] completed 4028 passes, 4028 misses
thread_signal_callback[1] completed 8080 passes, 8079 misses
Unfortunately it is not clear to me if this is good or bad?
Perhaps the test output can be improved, e.g. with a clear PASS/FAIL output?
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
next reply other threads:[~2019-08-27 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-27 12:30 Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2019-08-27 12:36 ` dma-buf: Add selftests for dma-fence Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMuHMdUk9G22rDfUrX3CZ=st3_bSehyaW_URtCk0ZfJqFTmLuQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).