From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDEBC433FE for ; Sat, 1 Oct 2022 10:13:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229548AbiJAKNJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Oct 2022 06:13:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39276 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229608AbiJAKNH (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Oct 2022 06:13:07 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75F4F1280C3; Sat, 1 Oct 2022 03:12:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id p202so5034198iod.6; Sat, 01 Oct 2022 03:12:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=6GSY4qcwaFrNmEXNiR+4xSvq+FPAuDaCRfPDxH8mn+U=; b=j6FQDMOHqhB+Kqr2jUI0KKPcCPxAuaXzBbFZJQ9xBP8GYyqZoC+0DtjiI/FT/BERAs nikqopXpoO4XWYPKO/y9vYK9EFhZm9CuDgt5peELtXytLvQSjepCB8456dKMIOmLYBYI ZKJq5+CCjvf0dgPm+Mcs19Nbj3wdQC6YtNN8TkB+222/Dpla5zISZqaO5QU1gwuCn2Af B+2oCAlRQWKRfrsZVMukdjgGVAVZNiJFYOUVPnj8S8ylgZl5k49b2j/7K00O6bdVT7Rs dh5XMAqPLUMScNs6cpcg7pRkqjulJ828UTByaMmjjHJ8zTuOYeWahpjujVThqmnzVR36 Gmpw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=6GSY4qcwaFrNmEXNiR+4xSvq+FPAuDaCRfPDxH8mn+U=; b=c1jixnmJc1CBz2Ptyjmt/72rra7JYdUQxCfolblw1akhXuIrBAu3VaNZmNrkAZPCco vdeC+Iif5CKey/yGN9lP0Oprd2hdp5NFABxxBMk/tGepDkP5HwdSLYpBWFbEysXU/eH+ 0kJzwiPrrIdVzS4ih6qiEz2QbEhCDNt8re7CtPHuLkHFelSn19hztuINsKbaS0dYmGfT Y/nUloR1wRx6SQwBJjM9vF172A88lmjtxMvgI09QZ9QHeI3njKE5p30/7y+YlFB86/pL sgnW1sqzpeMC1frY54eL11hncOywc6qVxm9/b3jd542L6r1WzPhKROCG3c8cEgPaonVl b3LA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0UYrRHeeTcHr2voyFUqhiE9MdsHnkxKnW4SLByKCZGaUCHUg28 fIERZn3LZFGC9v0yMjYUv7qNR94eu5HzhTtQLsmyM1DAULZI5g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4Um7lCeAnU7AhsQ9EKmAK7K/3OQy9UQ5uE26WQEPTWZwx+Cb6VgPlo12EkGzM16uz0DMBDbis8gqB89BOKt3c= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:218f:b0:35a:7f20:6a57 with SMTP id s15-20020a056638218f00b0035a7f206a57mr6560246jaj.186.1664619171887; Sat, 01 Oct 2022 03:12:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221001002638.2881842-1-dlatypov@google.com> <20221001002638.2881842-4-dlatypov@google.com> In-Reply-To: <20221001002638.2881842-4-dlatypov@google.com> From: Miguel Ojeda Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2022 12:12:41 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] kunit: eliminate KUNIT_INIT_*_ASSERT_STRUCT macros To: Daniel Latypov Cc: brendanhiggins@google.com, davidgow@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 2:26 AM Daniel Latypov wrote: > > But we can work around this with the following generic macro > #define KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(initializers...) { initializers } Is it intended to be internal, right? Should be prefixed by `_` then? Cheers, Miguel