From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2A6C43331 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 17:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6592166E for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 17:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="k75OSHpX" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387473AbfKGRzK (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Nov 2019 12:55:10 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f68.google.com ([209.85.167.68]:43498 "EHLO mail-lf1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730510AbfKGRzK (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Nov 2019 12:55:10 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f68.google.com with SMTP id j5so2268589lfh.10; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 09:55:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=prR1UZMSOAIrk4Kkrqgk3cxz5XFMU7J1f+HLAmadmHc=; b=k75OSHpXO01QPTNNrLLjcYsPg4Lq1iLJ5pUFGKwsVISN6U88T+jICyzwrViqzUD6SN RLUj8YwJ1vaafHNz3LLrSfZc+K9Pb39jEmAshvPYYoKGwZthzMcwUJtJloCF6qj0F6pE f9v2iCHusvJkCuhsLI/S1e3Pn1pFBj0uSNzCrr7XQFt88RZm51Cfq/9t2OIRtZy6aNto AeEhcsN2ene/7REGpIRR17I5DzWAz55YgC4aPx+1GwaCQnhcGRnkyFXJxriQn0Mz8SiQ G2NylxlyYe8lKFBGyh6EMfIh7GdpPqR/lbMxxc/g1A49ger/q5xZHN2GaSpJ3fYHMhRt +ZhA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=prR1UZMSOAIrk4Kkrqgk3cxz5XFMU7J1f+HLAmadmHc=; b=CwOb6vSvofIw6hqN6eo41agi7xHATmhhi0E1a9xqr6fDzuaVluOy2obP88/mCgUOKo e48EIQ1esOwh85jP2znKZ5EokVggOXAcS3lb0t+8cj3MoXjcVPfqBEUaZHKgnAn3gtZN cy+Y2xqk6XZ9s1cUbiE0SHGWCCbqChqbOBgQIWYFl8HrDbar+e8DSh5OPt4m8MSrmNv6 OFiPfRnq/ztWL/Tp4S0hPmcrN/rmUV2xmARchkUWrssTOPuwlgYdOTLQxrLa1kScyTIK J0bsyrEVmsFM4aEp0iA04LoGYW2oqU52lKv3qYzK8b072LGxgIO017stMI5tWfgUC0tv fPdA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUf4M8EttAZHhaqiT7ArLsXaaGRGH9L+rSDjpipDHhmCAI7HiaG ZkFwo6nGX5mq4xFHR/YR4u5ef2J6ejSXso4FnbIbzP9x X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqygRVVB9PzC/Yvc/jx8dk3X3dFH27ADz1C3x4fCebkohaUkCT0r8xkMa+S4mRPGUaKaD+a7MrbpcQ0EU4Jkjtg= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5c1b:: with SMTP id r27mr3194178lfp.172.1573149308049; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 09:55:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191107125224.29616-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <20191107125224.29616-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org> From: Song Liu Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 09:54:56 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] selftests: bpf: test_lwt_ip_encap: add missing object file to TEST_FILES To: Anders Roxell Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , "David S . Miller" , Networking , bpf , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, open list , Shuah Khan Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kselftest-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 4:53 AM Anders Roxell wrote: > > When installing kselftests to its own directory and running the > test_lwt_ip_encap.sh it will complain that test_lwt_ip_encap.o can't be > find. > > $ ./test_lwt_ip_encap.sh > starting egress IPv4 encap test > Error opening object test_lwt_ip_encap.o: No such file or directory > Object hashing failed! > Cannot initialize ELF context! > Failed to parse eBPF program: Invalid argument > > Rework to add test_lwt_ip_encap.o to TEST_FILES so the object file gets > installed when installing kselftest. > > Fixes: 74b5a5968fe8 ("selftests/bpf: Replace test_progs and test_maps w/ general rule") > Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell Please highlight that this set is on top of bpf-next tree with "[PATCH bpf-next 1/2]". Otherwise, looks good to me. Acked-by: Song Liu