From: Amit Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
To: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Gabor Kertesz <gabor.kertesz@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] kselftest/arm64: Fix check_buffer_fill test
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 15:55:38 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b04b862b-39c7-7cd6-7760-2b3a2b78e69e@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201026121248.2340-2-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
On 10/26/20 5:42 PM, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> The check_buffer_fill test reports the error below because the test
> plan is not declared correctly:
>
> # Planned tests != run tests (0 != 20)
>
> Fix the test adding the correct test plan declaration.
This change is required and got missed earlier.
Acked by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
>
> Fixes: e9b60476bea0 ("kselftest/arm64: Add utilities and a test to validate mte memory")
> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Gabor Kertesz <gabor.kertesz@arm.com>
> Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_buffer_fill.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_buffer_fill.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_buffer_fill.c
> index 242635d79035..c9fa141ebdcc 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_buffer_fill.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_buffer_fill.c
> @@ -417,6 +417,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> /* Register SIGSEGV handler */
> mte_register_signal(SIGSEGV, mte_default_handler);
>
> + /* Set test plan */
> + ksft_set_plan(20);
> +
> /* Buffer by byte tests */
> evaluate_test(check_buffer_by_byte(USE_MMAP, MTE_SYNC_ERR),
> "Check buffer correctness by byte with sync err mode and mmap memory\n");
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-27 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-26 12:12 [PATCH 0/6] kselftest/arm64: MTE fixes Vincenzo Frascino
2020-10-26 12:12 ` [PATCH 1/6] kselftest/arm64: Fix check_buffer_fill test Vincenzo Frascino
2020-10-27 10:25 ` Amit Kachhap [this message]
2020-10-26 12:12 ` [PATCH 2/6] kselftest/arm64: Fix check_tags_inclusion test Vincenzo Frascino
2020-10-27 10:27 ` Amit Kachhap
2020-10-26 12:12 ` [PATCH 3/6] kselftest/arm64: Fix check_child_memory test Vincenzo Frascino
2020-10-27 10:29 ` Amit Kachhap
2020-10-26 12:12 ` [PATCH 4/6] kselftest/arm64: Fix check_mmap_options test Vincenzo Frascino
2020-10-27 10:31 ` Amit Kachhap
2020-10-26 12:12 ` [PATCH 5/6] kselftest/arm64: Fix check_ksm_options test Vincenzo Frascino
2020-10-27 10:33 ` Amit Kachhap
2020-10-26 12:12 ` [PATCH 6/6] kselftest/arm64: Fix check_user_mem test Vincenzo Frascino
2020-10-27 10:34 ` Amit Kachhap
2020-10-28 15:12 ` [PATCH 0/6] kselftest/arm64: MTE fixes Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b04b862b-39c7-7cd6-7760-2b3a2b78e69e@arm.com \
--to=amit.kachhap@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gabor.kertesz@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).