Re: [PATCH RFC V3 3/9] x86/pks: Enable Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS)

[Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>]

On 10/9/20 12:42 PM, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote:
> +/*
> + * PKS is independent of PKU and either or both may be supported on a CPU.
> + * Configure PKS if the cpu supports the feature.
> + */

Let's at least be consistent about CPU vs. cpu in a single comment. :)

> +static void setup_pks(void)
> +{
> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SUPERVISOR_PKEYS))
> +		return;
> +	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_PKS))
> +		return;

If you put X86_FEATURE_PKS in disabled-features.h, you can get rid of
the explicit CONFIG_ check.

> +	cr4_set_bits(X86_CR4_PKS);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * This does the hard work of actually picking apart the CPU stuff...
>   */
> @@ -1544,6 +1558,7 @@ static void identify_cpu(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  
>  	x86_init_rdrand(c);
>  	setup_pku(c);
> +	setup_pks();
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Clear/Set all flags overridden by options, need do it
> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> index 6c974888f86f..1b9bc004d9bc 100644
> --- a/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -822,6 +822,8 @@ config ARCH_USES_HIGH_VMA_FLAGS
>  	bool
>  config ARCH_HAS_PKEYS
>  	bool
> +config ARCH_HAS_SUPERVISOR_PKEYS
> +	bool
>  
>  config PERCPU_STATS
>  	bool "Collect percpu memory statistics"
>