linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	"shuah@kernel.org" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"babu.moger@amd.com" <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	"james.morse@arm.com" <james.morse@arm.com>,
	"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 01/13] selftests/resctrl: Fix feature detection
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 11:54:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d185e125da333953e7a78eeab8538652905fd978.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <518831ab-0f4e-5c5c-10c2-52c5f8492df1@intel.com>

Hi Reinette,

On Wed, 2020-03-11 at 11:45 -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Sai,
> 
> On 3/11/2020 11:22 AM, Sai Praneeth Prakhya wrote:
> > Hi Reinette,
> > 
> > On Wed, 2020-03-11 at 11:06 -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> > > Hi Sai,
> > > 
> > > On 3/9/2020 3:51 PM, Prakhya, Sai Praneeth wrote:
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> > > > > Sent: Monday, March 9, 2020 3:34 PM
> > > > 
> > > > [SNIP]
> > > > 
> > > > > > That's a good point and makes sense to me. I think we could fix it
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > two ways 1. grep for strings in dmesg but that will still leave
> > > > > > ambiguity in deciding b/w mbm and cqm because kernel prints
> > > > > > "resctrl:
> > > > > > L3
> > > > > monitoring detected" for both the features 2. Check in "info"
> > > > > directory
> > > > > > 	a. For cat_l3, we could search for info/L3
> > > > > > 	b. For mba, we could search for info/MB
> > > > > > 	c. For cqm and mbm, we could search for specified string in
> > > > > > info/L3_MON/mon_features
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I think option 2 might be better because it can handle all cases,
> > > > > > please let me
> > > > > know what you think.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I agree. For the reasons you mention and also that (1) may not be
> > > > > possible if the
> > > > > loglevel prevents those lines from being printed.
> > > > 
> > > > Makes sense. I will work on the fix.
> > > 
> > > One more note about this ... from what I can tell the test for a feature
> > > currently fails if the platform does not support the feature. Would it
> > > be possible to just skip the test in this case instead?
> > 
> > That's because the output of the test should be just "ok" or "not ok".
> 
> The output could be something like:
> 
> ok MBA # SKIP MBA is not supported

Makes sense.. I will fix it.

> > I can change it to something like "# Skip <test_name> because platform
> > doesn't
> > support the feature", but not really sure if it complies with TAP 13
> > protocol.
> 
> Please consider the "skip" directive at
> https://testanything.org/tap-version-13-specification.html

Sure! thanks for the link :)

Regards,
Sai


  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-11 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-07  3:40 [PATCH V1 00/13] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 01/13] selftests/resctrl: Fix feature detection Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-09 21:44   ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-09 22:22     ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2020-03-09 22:33       ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-09 22:51         ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2020-03-11 18:06           ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 18:22             ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-11 18:45               ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 18:54                 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya [this message]
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 02/13] selftests/resctrl: Fix typo Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 03/13] selftests/resctrl: Fix typo in help text Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 04/13] selftests/resctrl: Ensure sibling CPU is not same as original CPU Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 05/13] selftests/resctrl: Fix missing options "-n" and "-p" Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 06/13] selftests/resctrl: Fix MBA/MBM results reporting format Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 07/13] selftests/resctrl: Don't use variable argument list for setup function Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 08/13] selftests/resctrl: Fix typos Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 09/13] selftests/resctrl: Modularize fill_buf for new CAT test case Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-10 21:59   ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11  1:04     ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
     [not found]       ` <50cb755f-e112-5d71-11fa-a7cbc951d91e@intel.com>
2020-03-11 17:45         ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-11 18:10           ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 18:14             ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 10/13] selftests/resctrl: Change Cache Allocation Technology (CAT) test Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-10 22:14   ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11  1:59     ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-11 17:03       ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 19:14         ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-11 20:22           ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 20:55             ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 11/13] selftests/resctrl: Change Cache Quality Monitoring (CQM) test Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-10 22:18   ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11  2:46     ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-11 17:19       ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 17:33         ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-11 18:03           ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 18:07             ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 12/13] selftests/resctrl: Dynamically select buffer size for CAT test Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-10 22:19   ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11  2:52     ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 13/13] selftests/resctrl: Cleanup fill_buff after changing " Sai Praneeth Prakhya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d185e125da333953e7a78eeab8538652905fd978.camel@intel.com \
    --to=sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).