linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests
@ 2020-05-18 22:08 Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 01/19] selftests/resctrl: Rename CQM test as CMT test Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (19 more replies)
  0 siblings, 20 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya @ 2020-05-18 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, tony.luck, reinette.chatre, babu.moger,
	james.morse, ravi.v.shankar, fenghua.yu, x86, linux-kernel,
	dan.carpenter, dcb314, Sai Praneeth Prakhya

This patch set has several miscellaneous fixes to resctrl selftest tool that are
easily visible to user. V1 had fixes to CAT test and CMT test but they were
dropped in V2 because having them here made the patchset humongous. So, changes
to CAT test and CMT test will be posted in another patchset.

Some warnings reported by sparse tool were fixed in this patchset but some are
not yet fixed. They will be fixed in another patchset.

Patches 1 to 14, 18 and 19 are independent fixes.
Patches 15 and 16 are preparatory patches for patch 17.

Thanks to Dan and David for reporting couple of issues.

V1 can be found at: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/6/1249

Based on v5.7-rc6.

Changes from V1:
================
1. Dropped changes to CAT test and CMT test as they will be posted in a later
   series.
2. Added several other fixes

Fenghua Yu (1):
  selftests/resctrl: Fix missing options "-n" and "-p"

Reinette Chatre (3):
  selftests/resctrl: Fix typo
  selftests/resctrl: Fix typo in help text
  selftests/resctrl: Ensure sibling CPU is not same as original CPU

Sai Praneeth Prakhya (15):
  selftests/resctrl: Rename CQM test as CMT test
  selftests/resctrl: Declare global variables as extern
  selftests/resctrl: Return if resctrl file system is not supported
  selftests/resctrl: Check for resctrl mount point only if resctrl FS is
    supported
  selftests/resctrl: Use resctrl/info for feature detection
  selftests/resctrl: Fix MBA/MBM results reporting format
  selftests/resctrl: Abort running tests if not root user
  selftests/resctrl: Enable gcc checks to detect buffer overflows
  selftests/resctrl: Dynamically select buffer size for CAT test
  selftests/resctrl: Skip the test if requested resctrl feature is not
    supported
  selftests/resctrl: Change return type of umount_resctrlfs() to void
  selftests/resctrl: Umount resctrl FS only if mounted
  selftests/resctrl: Unmount resctrl FS after running all tests
  selftests/resctrl: Fix incorrect parsing of iMC counters
  selftests/resctrl: Fix checking for < 0 for unsigned values

 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/Makefile      |  2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/README        |  4 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cache.c       |  4 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c    |  8 +-
 .../resctrl/{cqm_test.c => cmt_test.c}        | 23 +++---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c    | 23 +++---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c    | 16 ++--
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h     | 20 +++--
 .../testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c | 69 ++++++++++++-----
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c | 67 ++++++++++------
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c   | 77 +++++++++++++------
 11 files changed, 195 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)
 rename tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/{cqm_test.c => cmt_test.c} (88%)

-- 
2.19.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2 01/19] selftests/resctrl: Rename CQM test as CMT test
  2020-05-18 22:08 [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
@ 2020-05-18 22:08 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 02/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix typo Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (18 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya @ 2020-05-18 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, tony.luck, reinette.chatre, babu.moger,
	james.morse, ravi.v.shankar, fenghua.yu, x86, linux-kernel,
	dan.carpenter, dcb314, Sai Praneeth Prakhya

CQM (Cache Quality Monitoring) and CMT (Cache Monitoring Technology) are
synonyms referring to the same feature (i.e. measuring cache occupancy) in
Intel CPU's. Presently, resctrl test suit refers to this feature as CQM but
SDM refers to the same feature as CMT. SDM usage should be treated as
official naming, hence, rename cqm_test as cmt_test and change all the
places (functions, comments, variable names etc.) from cqm to cmt.

No functional changes intended.

Fixes: 78941183d1b1 ("selftests/resctrl: Add Cache QoS Monitoring (CQM) selftest")
Suggested-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/README        |  4 +--
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cache.c       |  4 +--
 .../resctrl/{cqm_test.c => cmt_test.c}        | 20 +++++++-------
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h     |  4 +--
 .../testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c | 26 +++++++++----------
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c | 12 ++++-----
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c   | 10 +++----
 7 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
 rename tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/{cqm_test.c => cmt_test.c} (89%)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/README b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/README
index 6e5a0ffa18e8..4b36b25b6ac0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/README
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/README
@@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ ARGUMENTS
 Parameter '-h' shows usage information.
 
 usage: resctrl_tests [-h] [-b "benchmark_cmd [options]"] [-t test list] [-n no_of_bits]
-        -b benchmark_cmd [options]: run specified benchmark for MBM, MBA and CQM default benchmark is builtin fill_buf
-        -t test list: run tests specified in the test list, e.g. -t mbm, mba, cqm, cat
+        -b benchmark_cmd [options]: run specified benchmark for MBM, MBA and CMT default benchmark is builtin fill_buf
+        -t test list: run tests specified in the test list, e.g. -t mbm, mba, cmt, cat
         -n no_of_bits: run cache tests using specified no of bits in cache bit mask
         -p cpu_no: specify CPU number to run the test. 1 is default
         -h: help
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cache.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cache.c
index 38dbf4962e33..4d73edd81293 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cache.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cache.c
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static int get_llc_perf(unsigned long *llc_perf_miss)
 
 /*
  * Get LLC Occupancy as reported by RESCTRL FS
- * For CQM,
+ * For CMT,
  * 1. If con_mon grp and mon grp given, then read from mon grp in
  * con_mon grp
  * 2. If only con_mon grp given, then read from con_mon grp
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ int measure_cache_vals(struct resctrl_val_param *param, int bm_pid)
 	/*
 	 * Measure llc occupancy from resctrl.
 	 */
-	if (!strcmp(param->resctrl_val, "cqm")) {
+	if (!strcmp(param->resctrl_val, "cmt")) {
 		ret = get_llc_occu_resctrl(&llc_occu_resc);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			return ret;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cqm_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
similarity index 89%
rename from tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cqm_test.c
rename to tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
index c8756152bd61..13b01e010238 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cqm_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 /*
- * Cache Monitoring Technology (CQM) test
+ * Cache Monitoring Technology (CMT) test
  *
  * Copyright (C) 2018 Intel Corporation
  *
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 #include "resctrl.h"
 #include <unistd.h>
 
-#define RESULT_FILE_NAME	"result_cqm"
+#define RESULT_FILE_NAME	"result_cmt"
 #define NUM_OF_RUNS		5
 #define MAX_DIFF		2000000
 #define MAX_DIFF_PERCENT	15
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ char cbm_mask[256];
 unsigned long long_mask;
 unsigned long cache_size;
 
-static int cqm_setup(int num, ...)
+static int cmt_setup(int num, ...)
 {
 	struct resctrl_val_param *p;
 	va_list param;
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static void show_cache_info(unsigned long sum_llc_occu_resc, int no_of_bits,
 	else
 		res = false;
 
-	printf("%sok CQM: diff within %d, %d\%%\n", res ? "" : "not",
+	printf("%sok CMT: diff within %d, %d\%%\n", res ? "" : "not",
 	       MAX_DIFF, (int)MAX_DIFF_PERCENT);
 
 	printf("# diff: %ld\n", avg_diff);
@@ -106,12 +106,12 @@ static int check_results(struct resctrl_val_param *param, int no_of_bits)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-void cqm_test_cleanup(void)
+void cmt_test_cleanup(void)
 {
 	remove(RESULT_FILE_NAME);
 }
 
-int cqm_resctrl_val(int cpu_no, int n, char **benchmark_cmd)
+int cmt_resctrl_val(int cpu_no, int n, char **benchmark_cmd)
 {
 	int ret, mum_resctrlfs;
 
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ int cqm_resctrl_val(int cpu_no, int n, char **benchmark_cmd)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	if (!validate_resctrl_feature_request("cqm"))
+	if (!validate_resctrl_feature_request("cmt"))
 		return -1;
 
 	ret = get_cbm_mask("L3");
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ int cqm_resctrl_val(int cpu_no, int n, char **benchmark_cmd)
 	}
 
 	struct resctrl_val_param param = {
-		.resctrl_val	= "cqm",
+		.resctrl_val	= "cmt",
 		.ctrlgrp	= "c1",
 		.mongrp		= "m1",
 		.cpu_no		= cpu_no,
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ int cqm_resctrl_val(int cpu_no, int n, char **benchmark_cmd)
 		.mask		= ~(long_mask << n) & long_mask,
 		.span		= cache_size * n / count_of_bits,
 		.num_of_runs	= 0,
-		.setup		= cqm_setup,
+		.setup		= cmt_setup,
 	};
 
 	if (strcmp(benchmark_cmd[0], "fill_buf") == 0)
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ int cqm_resctrl_val(int cpu_no, int n, char **benchmark_cmd)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	cqm_test_cleanup();
+	cmt_test_cleanup();
 
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
index 39bf59c6b9c5..68522b19b235 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
@@ -98,9 +98,9 @@ void ctrlc_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *info, void *ptr);
 int cat_val(struct resctrl_val_param *param);
 void cat_test_cleanup(void);
 int cat_perf_miss_val(int cpu_no, int no_of_bits, char *cache_type);
-int cqm_resctrl_val(int cpu_no, int n, char **benchmark_cmd);
+int cmt_resctrl_val(int cpu_no, int n, char **benchmark_cmd);
 unsigned int count_bits(unsigned long n);
-void cqm_test_cleanup(void);
+void cmt_test_cleanup(void);
 int get_core_sibling(int cpu_no);
 int measure_cache_vals(struct resctrl_val_param *param, int bm_pid);
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
index 425cc85ac883..35a91cab1b88 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
@@ -37,10 +37,10 @@ void detect_amd(void)
 static void cmd_help(void)
 {
 	printf("usage: resctrl_tests [-h] [-b \"benchmark_cmd [options]\"] [-t test list] [-n no_of_bits]\n");
-	printf("\t-b benchmark_cmd [options]: run specified benchmark for MBM, MBA and CQM");
+	printf("\t-b benchmark_cmd [options]: run specified benchmark for MBM, MBA and CMT");
 	printf("\t default benchmark is builtin fill_buf\n");
 	printf("\t-t test list: run tests specified in the test list, ");
-	printf("e.g. -t mbm, mba, cqm, cat\n");
+	printf("e.g. -t mbm, mba, cmt, cat\n");
 	printf("\t-n no_of_bits: run cache tests using specified no of bits in cache bit mask\n");
 	printf("\t-p cpu_no: specify CPU number to run the test. 1 is default\n");
 	printf("\t-h: help\n");
@@ -50,13 +50,13 @@ void tests_cleanup(void)
 {
 	mbm_test_cleanup();
 	mba_test_cleanup();
-	cqm_test_cleanup();
+	cmt_test_cleanup();
 	cat_test_cleanup();
 }
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
-	bool has_ben = false, mbm_test = true, mba_test = true, cqm_test = true;
+	bool has_ben = false, mbm_test = true, mba_test = true, cmt_test = true;
 	int res, c, cpu_no = 1, span = 250, argc_new = argc, i, no_of_bits = 5;
 	char *benchmark_cmd[BENCHMARK_ARGS], bw_report[64], bm_type[64];
 	char benchmark_cmd_area[BENCHMARK_ARGS][BENCHMARK_ARG_SIZE];
@@ -82,15 +82,15 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 
 			mbm_test = false;
 			mba_test = false;
-			cqm_test = false;
+			cmt_test = false;
 			cat_test = false;
 			while (token) {
 				if (!strcmp(token, "mbm")) {
 					mbm_test = true;
 				} else if (!strcmp(token, "mba")) {
 					mba_test = true;
-				} else if (!strcmp(token, "cqm")) {
-					cqm_test = true;
+				} else if (!strcmp(token, "cmt")) {
+					cmt_test = true;
 				} else if (!strcmp(token, "cat")) {
 					cat_test = true;
 				} else {
@@ -178,13 +178,13 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		tests_run++;
 	}
 
-	if (cqm_test) {
-		printf("# Starting CQM test ...\n");
+	if (cmt_test) {
+		printf("# Starting CMT test ...\n");
 		if (!has_ben)
-			sprintf(benchmark_cmd[5], "%s", "cqm");
-		res = cqm_resctrl_val(cpu_no, no_of_bits, benchmark_cmd);
-		printf("%sok CQM: test\n", res ? "not " : "");
-		cqm_test_cleanup();
+			sprintf(benchmark_cmd[5], "%s", "cmt");
+		res = cmt_resctrl_val(cpu_no, no_of_bits, benchmark_cmd);
+		printf("%sok CMT: test\n", res ? "not " : "");
+		cmt_test_cleanup();
 		tests_run++;
 	}
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
index 520fea3606d1..270cd95e0026 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
@@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ static int print_results_bw(char *filename,  int bm_pid, float bw_imc,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void set_cqm_path(const char *ctrlgrp, const char *mongrp, char sock_num)
+static void set_cmt_path(const char *ctrlgrp, const char *mongrp, char sock_num)
 {
 	if (strlen(ctrlgrp) && strlen(mongrp))
 		sprintf(llc_occup_path,	CON_MON_LCC_OCCUP_PATH,	RESCTRL_PATH,
@@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ static void set_cqm_path(const char *ctrlgrp, const char *mongrp, char sock_num)
  * @ctrlgrp:			Name of the control monitor group (con_mon grp)
  * @mongrp:			Name of the monitor group (mon grp)
  * @cpu_no:			CPU number that the benchmark PID is binded to
- * @resctrl_val:		Resctrl feature (Eg: cat, cqm.. etc)
+ * @resctrl_val:		Resctrl feature (Eg: cat, cmt.. etc)
  */
 static void initialize_llc_occu_resctrl(const char *ctrlgrp, const char *mongrp,
 					int cpu_no, char *resctrl_val)
@@ -524,8 +524,8 @@ static void initialize_llc_occu_resctrl(const char *ctrlgrp, const char *mongrp,
 		return;
 	}
 
-	if (strcmp(resctrl_val, "cqm") == 0)
-		set_cqm_path(ctrlgrp, mongrp, resource_id);
+	if (strcmp(resctrl_val, "cmt") == 0)
+		set_cmt_path(ctrlgrp, mongrp, resource_id);
 }
 
 static int
@@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ int resctrl_val(char **benchmark_cmd, struct resctrl_val_param *param)
 
 		initialize_mem_bw_resctrl(param->ctrlgrp, param->mongrp,
 					  param->cpu_no, resctrl_val);
-	} else if (strcmp(resctrl_val, "cqm") == 0)
+	} else if (strcmp(resctrl_val, "cmt") == 0)
 		initialize_llc_occu_resctrl(param->ctrlgrp, param->mongrp,
 					    param->cpu_no, resctrl_val);
 
@@ -721,7 +721,7 @@ int resctrl_val(char **benchmark_cmd, struct resctrl_val_param *param)
 			ret = measure_vals(param, &bw_resc_start);
 			if (ret)
 				break;
-		} else if (strcmp(resctrl_val, "cqm") == 0) {
+		} else if (strcmp(resctrl_val, "cmt") == 0) {
 			ret = param->setup(1, param);
 			if (ret) {
 				ret = 0;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
index 19c0ec4045a4..727e667e2cc9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ void run_benchmark(int signum, siginfo_t *info, void *ucontext)
 		operation = atoi(benchmark_cmd[4]);
 		sprintf(resctrl_val, "%s", benchmark_cmd[5]);
 
-		if (strcmp(resctrl_val, "cqm") != 0)
+		if (strcmp(resctrl_val, "cmt") != 0)
 			buffer_span = span * MB;
 		else
 			buffer_span = span;
@@ -458,8 +458,8 @@ int write_bm_pid_to_resctrl(pid_t bm_pid, char *ctrlgrp, char *mongrp,
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
 
-	/* Create mon grp and write pid into it for "mbm" and "cqm" test */
-	if ((strcmp(resctrl_val, "cqm") == 0) ||
+	/* Create mon grp and write pid into it for "mbm" and "cmt" test */
+	if ((strcmp(resctrl_val, "cmt") == 0) ||
 	    (strcmp(resctrl_val, "mbm") == 0)) {
 		if (strlen(mongrp)) {
 			sprintf(monitorgroup_p, "%s/mon_groups", controlgroup);
@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ int write_schemata(char *ctrlgrp, char *schemata, int cpu_no, char *resctrl_val)
 
 	if ((strcmp(resctrl_val, "mba") != 0) &&
 	    (strcmp(resctrl_val, "cat") != 0) &&
-	    (strcmp(resctrl_val, "cqm") != 0))
+	    (strcmp(resctrl_val, "cmt") != 0))
 		return -ENOENT;
 
 	if (!schemata) {
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ int write_schemata(char *ctrlgrp, char *schemata, int cpu_no, char *resctrl_val)
 	else
 		sprintf(controlgroup, "%s/schemata", RESCTRL_PATH);
 
-	if (!strcmp(resctrl_val, "cat") || !strcmp(resctrl_val, "cqm"))
+	if (!strcmp(resctrl_val, "cat") || !strcmp(resctrl_val, "cmt"))
 		sprintf(schema, "%s%d%c%s", "L3:", resource_id, '=', schemata);
 	if (strcmp(resctrl_val, "mba") == 0)
 		sprintf(schema, "%s%d%c%s", "MB:", resource_id, '=', schemata);
-- 
2.19.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2 02/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix typo
  2020-05-18 22:08 [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 01/19] selftests/resctrl: Rename CQM test as CMT test Sai Praneeth Prakhya
@ 2020-05-18 22:08 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 03/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix typo in help text Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (17 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya @ 2020-05-18 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, tony.luck, reinette.chatre, babu.moger,
	james.morse, ravi.v.shankar, fenghua.yu, x86, linux-kernel,
	dan.carpenter, dcb314, Sai Praneeth Prakhya

From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>

The format "%sok" is used to print results of a test. If the test passes,
the empty string is printed and if the test fails "not " is printed. This
results in output of "ok" when test passes and "not ok"
when test fails.

Fix one instance where "not" (without a space) is printed on test
failure resulting in output of "notok" on test failure.

Fixes: 78941183d1b1 ("selftests/resctrl: Add Cache QoS Monitoring (CQM) selftest")
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
index 13b01e010238..6ffb56c6a1e2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static void show_cache_info(unsigned long sum_llc_occu_resc, int no_of_bits,
 	else
 		res = false;
 
-	printf("%sok CMT: diff within %d, %d\%%\n", res ? "" : "not",
+	printf("%sok CMT: diff within %d, %d\%%\n", res ? "" : "not ",
 	       MAX_DIFF, (int)MAX_DIFF_PERCENT);
 
 	printf("# diff: %ld\n", avg_diff);
-- 
2.19.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2 03/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix typo in help text
  2020-05-18 22:08 [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 01/19] selftests/resctrl: Rename CQM test as CMT test Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 02/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix typo Sai Praneeth Prakhya
@ 2020-05-18 22:08 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 04/19] selftests/resctrl: Declare global variables as extern Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (16 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya @ 2020-05-18 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, tony.luck, reinette.chatre, babu.moger,
	james.morse, ravi.v.shankar, fenghua.yu, x86, linux-kernel,
	dan.carpenter, dcb314, Sai Praneeth Prakhya

From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>

Add a missing newline to the help text printed and fixup the next line
to line it up to previous line for improved readability.

Fixes: 78941183d1b1 ("selftests/resctrl: Add Cache QoS Monitoring (CQM) selftest")
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
index 35a91cab1b88..b2a560c0c5dc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
@@ -37,8 +37,8 @@ void detect_amd(void)
 static void cmd_help(void)
 {
 	printf("usage: resctrl_tests [-h] [-b \"benchmark_cmd [options]\"] [-t test list] [-n no_of_bits]\n");
-	printf("\t-b benchmark_cmd [options]: run specified benchmark for MBM, MBA and CMT");
-	printf("\t default benchmark is builtin fill_buf\n");
+	printf("\t-b benchmark_cmd [options]: run specified benchmark for MBM, MBA and CMT\n");
+	printf("\t   default benchmark is builtin fill_buf\n");
 	printf("\t-t test list: run tests specified in the test list, ");
 	printf("e.g. -t mbm, mba, cmt, cat\n");
 	printf("\t-n no_of_bits: run cache tests using specified no of bits in cache bit mask\n");
-- 
2.19.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2 04/19] selftests/resctrl: Declare global variables as extern
  2020-05-18 22:08 [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 03/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix typo in help text Sai Praneeth Prakhya
@ 2020-05-18 22:08 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 05/19] selftests/resctrl: Return if resctrl file system is not supported Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (15 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya @ 2020-05-18 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, tony.luck, reinette.chatre, babu.moger,
	james.morse, ravi.v.shankar, fenghua.yu, x86, linux-kernel,
	dan.carpenter, dcb314, Sai Praneeth Prakhya

resctrl test suite uses global variables (E.g: bm_pid, ppid, llc_occup_path
and is_amd) that are used across .c files. Declare them as 'extern'
variables in resctrl.h file so that they are defined only in one .c file.
Otherwise sparse tool warns it as multiple definitions of the same
variable.

Sparse still complains about "bm_pid" variable name being used globally and
locally to a function in cache.c file. This issue will be addressed in a
later patch series.

Fixes: 591a6e8588fc ("selftests/resctrl: Add basic resctrl file system operations and data")
Reported-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
index 68522b19b235..814d0dd517a4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
@@ -62,11 +62,11 @@ struct resctrl_val_param {
 	int		(*setup)(int num, ...);
 };
 
-pid_t bm_pid, ppid;
-int tests_run;
+extern pid_t bm_pid, ppid;
+extern int tests_run;
 
-char llc_occup_path[1024];
-bool is_amd;
+extern char llc_occup_path[1024];
+extern bool is_amd;
 
 bool check_resctrlfs_support(void);
 int filter_dmesg(void);
-- 
2.19.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2 05/19] selftests/resctrl: Return if resctrl file system is not supported
  2020-05-18 22:08 [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 04/19] selftests/resctrl: Declare global variables as extern Sai Praneeth Prakhya
@ 2020-05-18 22:08 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 06/19] selftests/resctrl: Check for resctrl mount point only if resctrl FS is supported Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya @ 2020-05-18 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, tony.luck, reinette.chatre, babu.moger,
	james.morse, ravi.v.shankar, fenghua.yu, x86, linux-kernel,
	dan.carpenter, dcb314, Sai Praneeth Prakhya

Presently, return value of check_resctrlfs_support() is not checked and
hence the test tries to execute individual tests like CAT, CMT, MBM and
MBA even if resctrl file system is not supported in /proc/filesystems. Fix
this by checking for the return value of check_resctrlfs_support() and if
it returns false i.e. resctrl file system is not supported, then don't run
any tests.

Fixes: ecdbb911f22d ("selftests/resctrl: Add MBM test")
Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
index b2a560c0c5dc..d24de546d4ef 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
@@ -155,7 +155,11 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 	sprintf(bw_report, "reads");
 	sprintf(bm_type, "fill_buf");
 
-	check_resctrlfs_support();
+	if (!check_resctrlfs_support()) {
+		printf("Bail out! resctrl FS does not exist\n");
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	filter_dmesg();
 
 	if (!is_amd && mbm_test) {
@@ -196,6 +200,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		cat_test_cleanup();
 	}
 
+out:
 	printf("1..%d\n", tests_run);
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.19.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2 06/19] selftests/resctrl: Check for resctrl mount point only if resctrl FS is supported
  2020-05-18 22:08 [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 05/19] selftests/resctrl: Return if resctrl file system is not supported Sai Praneeth Prakhya
@ 2020-05-18 22:08 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 07/19] selftests/resctrl: Use resctrl/info for feature detection Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya @ 2020-05-18 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, tony.luck, reinette.chatre, babu.moger,
	james.morse, ravi.v.shankar, fenghua.yu, x86, linux-kernel,
	dan.carpenter, dcb314, Sai Praneeth Prakhya

Presently, check_resctrlfs_support() tries to open "/sys/fs/resctrl" and
will also look for resctrl mount point in "/proc/mounts" even if resctrl
file system is not supported. Both the above will fail if resctrl file
system is not supported. Hence, return immediately if resctrl file system
is not supported.

Fixes: ecdbb911f22d ("selftests/resctrl: Add MBM test")
Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
index 727e667e2cc9..e43ddebd1aa4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
@@ -581,6 +581,9 @@ bool check_resctrlfs_support(void)
 	printf("%sok kernel supports resctrl filesystem\n", ret ? "" : "not ");
 	tests_run++;
 
+	if (!ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	dp = opendir(RESCTRL_PATH);
 	printf("%sok resctrl mountpoint \"%s\" exists\n",
 	       dp ? "" : "not ", RESCTRL_PATH);
-- 
2.19.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2 07/19] selftests/resctrl: Use resctrl/info for feature detection
  2020-05-18 22:08 [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 06/19] selftests/resctrl: Check for resctrl mount point only if resctrl FS is supported Sai Praneeth Prakhya
@ 2020-05-18 22:08 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 08/19] selftests/resctrl: Ensure sibling CPU is not same as original CPU Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya @ 2020-05-18 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, tony.luck, reinette.chatre, babu.moger,
	james.morse, ravi.v.shankar, fenghua.yu, x86, linux-kernel,
	dan.carpenter, dcb314, Sai Praneeth Prakhya

RDT features could be enabled or disabled through kernel command line
parameters. This is not reflected in /proc/cpuinfo i.e. cpuinfo always
shows the features supported by H/W whereas user could selectively enable
or disable some of these features. So, before running a requested test,
/proc/cpuinfo cannot be used to check if the system supports the
requested RDT feature.

A more appropriate place to check for this is resctrl/info. Directories
like L3, MB and L3_MON are populated only if the respective feature is
enabled. Hence, use resctrl/info for feature detection instead of
/proc/cpuinfo.

Please note that, presently, only L3_CAT, L3_CMT, MBA and MBM are
supported. L2 and CDP variants of L3 are not yet supported.

Fixes: 591a6e8588fc ("selftests/resctrl: Add basic resctrl file system operations and data")
Reported-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h   |  6 ++-
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
index 814d0dd517a4..65ca24bf3eac 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
@@ -28,6 +28,10 @@
 #define RESCTRL_PATH		"/sys/fs/resctrl"
 #define PHYS_ID_PATH		"/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu"
 #define CBM_MASK_PATH		"/sys/fs/resctrl/info"
+#define L3_PATH			"/sys/fs/resctrl/info/L3"
+#define MB_PATH			"/sys/fs/resctrl/info/MB"
+#define L3_MON_PATH		"/sys/fs/resctrl/info/L3_MON"
+#define L3_MON_FEATURES_PATH	"/sys/fs/resctrl/info/L3_MON/mon_features"
 
 #define PARENT_EXIT(err_msg)			\
 	do {					\
@@ -74,7 +78,7 @@ int remount_resctrlfs(bool mum_resctrlfs);
 int get_resource_id(int cpu_no, int *resource_id);
 int umount_resctrlfs(void);
 int validate_bw_report_request(char *bw_report);
-bool validate_resctrl_feature_request(char *resctrl_val);
+bool validate_resctrl_feature_request(const char *resctrl_val);
 char *fgrep(FILE *inf, const char *str);
 int taskset_benchmark(pid_t bm_pid, int cpu_no);
 void run_benchmark(int signum, siginfo_t *info, void *ucontext);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
index e43ddebd1aa4..67d775d03271 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
@@ -618,26 +618,55 @@ char *fgrep(FILE *inf, const char *str)
  * validate_resctrl_feature_request - Check if requested feature is valid.
  * @resctrl_val:	Requested feature
  *
- * Return: 0 on success, non-zero on failure
+ * Return: True if the feature is supported, else false
  */
-bool validate_resctrl_feature_request(char *resctrl_val)
+bool validate_resctrl_feature_request(const char *resctrl_val)
 {
-	FILE *inf = fopen("/proc/cpuinfo", "r");
+	struct stat statbuf;
 	bool found = false;
 	char *res;
+	FILE *inf;
 
-	if (!inf)
+	if (!resctrl_val)
 		return false;
 
-	res = fgrep(inf, "flags");
-
-	if (res) {
-		char *s = strchr(res, ':');
+	if (remount_resctrlfs(false))
+		return false;
 
-		found = s && !strstr(s, resctrl_val);
-		free(res);
+	if (!strcmp(resctrl_val, "cat")) {
+		if (!stat(L3_PATH, &statbuf))
+			return true;
+	} else if (!strcmp(resctrl_val, "mba")) {
+		if (!stat(MB_PATH, &statbuf))
+			return true;
+	} else if (!strcmp(resctrl_val, "mbm") || !strcmp(resctrl_val, "cmt")) {
+		if (!stat(L3_MON_PATH, &statbuf)) {
+			inf = fopen(L3_MON_FEATURES_PATH, "r");
+			if (!inf)
+				return false;
+
+			if (!strcmp(resctrl_val, "cmt")) {
+				res = fgrep(inf, "llc_occupancy");
+				if (res) {
+					found = true;
+					free(res);
+				}
+			}
+
+			if (!strcmp(resctrl_val, "mbm")) {
+				res = fgrep(inf, "mbm_total_bytes");
+				if (res) {
+					free(res);
+					res = fgrep(inf, "mbm_local_bytes");
+					if (res) {
+						found = true;
+						free(res);
+					}
+				}
+			}
+			fclose(inf);
+		}
 	}
-	fclose(inf);
 
 	return found;
 }
-- 
2.19.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2 08/19] selftests/resctrl: Ensure sibling CPU is not same as original CPU
  2020-05-18 22:08 [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 07/19] selftests/resctrl: Use resctrl/info for feature detection Sai Praneeth Prakhya
@ 2020-05-18 22:08 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 09/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix missing options "-n" and "-p" Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya @ 2020-05-18 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, tony.luck, reinette.chatre, babu.moger,
	james.morse, ravi.v.shankar, fenghua.yu, x86, linux-kernel,
	dan.carpenter, dcb314, Sai Praneeth Prakhya

From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>

The resctrl tests can accept a CPU on which the tests are run and use
default of CPU #1 if it is not provided. In the CAT test a "sibling CPU"
is determined that is from the same package where another thread will be
run.

The current algorithm with which a "sibling CPU" is determined does not
take the provided/default CPU into account and when that CPU is the
first CPU in a package then the "sibling CPU" will be selected to be the
same CPU since it starts by picking the first CPU from core_siblings_list.

Fix the "sibling CPU" selection by taking the provided/default CPU into
account and ensuring a sibling that is a different CPU is selected.

Fixes: 78941183d1b1 ("selftests/resctrl: Add Cache QoS Monitoring (CQM) selftest")
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
index 67d775d03271..05956319d9ce 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ int get_core_sibling(int cpu_no)
 	while (token) {
 		sibling_cpu_no = atoi(token);
 		/* Skipping core 0 as we don't want to run test on core 0 */
-		if (sibling_cpu_no != 0)
+		if (sibling_cpu_no != 0 && sibling_cpu_no != cpu_no)
 			break;
 		token = strtok(NULL, "-,");
 	}
-- 
2.19.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2 09/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix missing options "-n" and "-p"
  2020-05-18 22:08 [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 08/19] selftests/resctrl: Ensure sibling CPU is not same as original CPU Sai Praneeth Prakhya
@ 2020-05-18 22:08 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 10/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix MBA/MBM results reporting format Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya @ 2020-05-18 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, tony.luck, reinette.chatre, babu.moger,
	james.morse, ravi.v.shankar, fenghua.yu, x86, linux-kernel,
	dan.carpenter, dcb314, Sai Praneeth Prakhya

From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>

Add missing options "-n" and "-p" in getopt() so that the options can take
action. Other code related to the options is in place already and no
change is needed.

Fixes: ecdbb911f22d ("selftests/resctrl: Add MBM test")
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
index d24de546d4ef..cab69ed8c67d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		}
 	}
 
-	while ((c = getopt(argc_new, argv, "ht:b:")) != -1) {
+	while ((c = getopt(argc_new, argv, "ht:b:n:p:")) != -1) {
 		char *token;
 
 		switch (c) {
-- 
2.19.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2 10/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix MBA/MBM results reporting format
  2020-05-18 22:08 [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 09/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix missing options "-n" and "-p" Sai Praneeth Prakhya
@ 2020-05-18 22:08 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 11/19] selftests/resctrl: Abort running tests if not root user Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya @ 2020-05-18 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, tony.luck, reinette.chatre, babu.moger,
	james.morse, ravi.v.shankar, fenghua.yu, x86, linux-kernel,
	dan.carpenter, dcb314, Sai Praneeth Prakhya

Currently MBM/MBA tests use absolute values to check results. But, iMC
values and MBM resctrl values may vary on different platforms and
specifically for MBA the values may vary as schemata changes. Hence, use
percentage instead of absolute values to check tests result.

Fixes: 01fee6b4d1f9 ("selftests/resctrl: Add MBA test")
Fixes: ecdbb911f22d ("selftests/resctrl: Add MBM test")
Co-developed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c | 13 +++++++------
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
index 7bf8eaa6204b..ba0234d4829e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 
 #define RESULT_FILE_NAME	"result_mba"
 #define NUM_OF_RUNS		5
-#define MAX_DIFF		300
+#define MAX_DIFF_PERCENT	5
 #define ALLOCATION_MAX		100
 #define ALLOCATION_MIN		10
 #define ALLOCATION_STEP		10
@@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ static void show_mba_info(unsigned long *bw_imc, unsigned long *bw_resc)
 	     allocation++) {
 		unsigned long avg_bw_imc, avg_bw_resc;
 		unsigned long sum_bw_imc = 0, sum_bw_resc = 0;
-		unsigned long avg_diff;
+		int avg_diff_per;
+		float avg_diff;
 
 		/*
 		 * The first run is discarded due to inaccurate value from
@@ -76,17 +77,18 @@ static void show_mba_info(unsigned long *bw_imc, unsigned long *bw_resc)
 
 		avg_bw_imc = sum_bw_imc / (NUM_OF_RUNS - 1);
 		avg_bw_resc = sum_bw_resc / (NUM_OF_RUNS - 1);
-		avg_diff = labs((long)(avg_bw_resc - avg_bw_imc));
+		avg_diff = (float)labs(avg_bw_resc - avg_bw_imc) / avg_bw_imc;
+		avg_diff_per = (int)(avg_diff * 100);
 
-		printf("%sok MBA schemata percentage %u smaller than %d %%\n",
-		       avg_diff > MAX_DIFF ? "not " : "",
-		       ALLOCATION_MAX - ALLOCATION_STEP * allocation,
-		       MAX_DIFF);
+		printf("%sok MBA: diff within %d%% for schemata %u\n",
+		       avg_diff_per > MAX_DIFF_PERCENT ? "not " : "",
+		       MAX_DIFF_PERCENT,
+		       ALLOCATION_MAX - ALLOCATION_STEP * allocation);
 		tests_run++;
-		printf("# avg_diff: %lu\n", avg_diff);
+		printf("# avg_diff_per: %d%%\n", avg_diff_per);
 		printf("# avg_bw_imc: %lu\n", avg_bw_imc);
 		printf("# avg_bw_resc: %lu\n", avg_bw_resc);
-		if (avg_diff > MAX_DIFF)
+		if (avg_diff_per > MAX_DIFF_PERCENT)
 			failed = true;
 	}
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
index 4700f7453f81..ca610c3ebc8c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 #include "resctrl.h"
 
 #define RESULT_FILE_NAME	"result_mbm"
-#define MAX_DIFF		300
+#define MAX_DIFF_PERCENT	5
 #define NUM_OF_RUNS		5
 
 static void
@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ show_bw_info(unsigned long *bw_imc, unsigned long *bw_resc, int span)
 {
 	unsigned long avg_bw_imc = 0, avg_bw_resc = 0;
 	unsigned long sum_bw_imc = 0, sum_bw_resc = 0;
-	long avg_diff = 0;
-	int runs;
+	int runs, avg_diff_per;
+	float avg_diff = 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * Discard the first value which is inaccurate due to monitoring setup
@@ -33,12 +33,13 @@ show_bw_info(unsigned long *bw_imc, unsigned long *bw_resc, int span)
 
 	avg_bw_imc = sum_bw_imc / 4;
 	avg_bw_resc = sum_bw_resc / 4;
-	avg_diff = avg_bw_resc - avg_bw_imc;
+	avg_diff = (float)labs(avg_bw_resc - avg_bw_imc) / avg_bw_imc;
+	avg_diff_per = (int)(avg_diff * 100);
 
 	printf("%sok MBM: diff within %d%%\n",
-	       labs(avg_diff) > MAX_DIFF ? "not " : "", MAX_DIFF);
+	       avg_diff_per > MAX_DIFF_PERCENT ? "not " : "", MAX_DIFF_PERCENT);
 	tests_run++;
-	printf("# avg_diff: %lu\n", labs(avg_diff));
+	printf("# avg_diff_per: %d%%\n", avg_diff_per);
 	printf("# Span (MB): %d\n", span);
 	printf("# avg_bw_imc: %lu\n", avg_bw_imc);
 	printf("# avg_bw_resc: %lu\n", avg_bw_resc);
-- 
2.19.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2 11/19] selftests/resctrl: Abort running tests if not root user
  2020-05-18 22:08 [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 10/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix MBA/MBM results reporting format Sai Praneeth Prakhya
@ 2020-05-18 22:08 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 12/19] selftests/resctrl: Enable gcc checks to detect buffer overflows Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya @ 2020-05-18 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, tony.luck, reinette.chatre, babu.moger,
	james.morse, ravi.v.shankar, fenghua.yu, x86, linux-kernel,
	dan.carpenter, dcb314, Sai Praneeth Prakhya

Running resctrl selftest requires the test to write to resctrl file system
and only root user has permission to do so. Hence, abort the test suite if
the user is not running the test with root user privileges.

Fixes: ecdbb911f22d ("selftests/resctrl: Add MBM test")
Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
index cab69ed8c67d..f005ba2b41ec 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
@@ -125,8 +125,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 	 * 1. We write to resctrl FS
 	 * 2. We execute perf commands
 	 */
-	if (geteuid() != 0)
-		printf("# WARNING: not running as root, tests may fail.\n");
+	if (geteuid() != 0) {
+		printf("Bail out! not running as root, abort testing\n");
+		return -1;
+	}
 
 	/* Detect AMD vendor */
 	detect_amd();
-- 
2.19.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2 12/19] selftests/resctrl: Enable gcc checks to detect buffer overflows
  2020-05-18 22:08 [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 11/19] selftests/resctrl: Abort running tests if not root user Sai Praneeth Prakhya
@ 2020-05-18 22:08 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 13/19] selftests/resctrl: Dynamically select buffer size for CAT test Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya @ 2020-05-18 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, tony.luck, reinette.chatre, babu.moger,
	james.morse, ravi.v.shankar, fenghua.yu, x86, linux-kernel,
	dan.carpenter, dcb314, Sai Praneeth Prakhya

Feature Test Macros man page says the below about _FORTIFY_SOURCE

"Defining this macro causes some lightweight checks to be performed to
detect some buffer overflow errors when employing various string and memory
manipulation functions (for example, memcpy, memset, stpcpy, strcpy,
strncpy, strcat, strncat, sprintf, snprintf, vsprintf, vsnprintf, gets, and
wide character variants thereof). For some functions, argument consistency
is checked; for example, a check is made that open has been supplied with a
mode argument when the specified flags include O_CREAT. Not all problems
are detected, just some common cases.

If _FORTIFY_SOURCE is set to 1, with compiler optimization level 1 (gcc
-O1) and above, checks that shouldn't change the behavior of conforming
programs are performed.

With _FORTIFY_SOURCE set to 2, some more checking is added, but some
conforming programs might fail.

Some of the checks can be performed at compile time (via macros logic
implemented in header files), and result in compiler warnings; other checks
take place at run time, and result in a run-time error if the check fails.

Use of this macro requires compiler support, available with gcc since
version 4.0."

Enable this gcc check to catch buffer overflow bugs like the one in CMT
test.

Fixes: 78941183d1b1 ("selftests/resctrl: Add Cache QoS Monitoring (CQM) selftest")
Reported-by: David Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com>
Suggested-by: David Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/Makefile   | 2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/Makefile
index d585cc1948cc..6bcee2ec91a9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/Makefile
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc
-CFLAGS = -g -Wall
+CFLAGS = -g -Wall -O2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
 SRCS=$(wildcard *.c)
 OBJS=$(SRCS:.c=.o)
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
index 6ffb56c6a1e2..282ba7fcf17c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static int check_results(struct resctrl_val_param *param, int no_of_bits)
 		return errno;
 	}
 
-	while (fgets(temp, 1024, fp)) {
+	while (fgets(temp, sizeof(temp), fp)) {
 		char *token = strtok(temp, ":\t");
 		int fields = 0;
 
-- 
2.19.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2 13/19] selftests/resctrl: Dynamically select buffer size for CAT test
  2020-05-18 22:08 [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 12/19] selftests/resctrl: Enable gcc checks to detect buffer overflows Sai Praneeth Prakhya
@ 2020-05-18 22:08 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 14/19] selftests/resctrl: Skip the test if requested resctrl feature is not supported Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya @ 2020-05-18 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, tony.luck, reinette.chatre, babu.moger,
	james.morse, ravi.v.shankar, fenghua.yu, x86, linux-kernel,
	dan.carpenter, dcb314, Sai Praneeth Prakhya

Presently, while running CAT test case, if user hasn't given any input for
'-n' option, the test defaults to 5 bits to determine the buffer size that
is used during test. This might become a problem on system with max_cbm
mask <= 5 bits. Hence, instead of statically running always with 5 bits,
change it such that the buffer size is always half of the cache size.

Please note that CMT test is still hard coded with 5 bits. It will change
in subsequent patches that change CMT test.

Fixes: 790bf585b0ee ("selftests/resctrl: Add Cache Allocation Technology (CAT) selftest")
Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c      | 5 ++++-
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c | 8 ++++++--
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
index 5da43767b973..1bce84e23783 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
@@ -151,7 +151,10 @@ int cat_perf_miss_val(int cpu_no, int n, char *cache_type)
 	/* Get max number of bits from default-cabm mask */
 	count_of_bits = count_bits(long_mask);
 
-	if (n < 1 || n > count_of_bits - 1) {
+	if (!n)
+		n = count_of_bits / 2;
+
+	if (n > count_of_bits - 1) {
 		printf("Invalid input value for no_of_bits n!\n");
 		printf("Please Enter value in range 1 to %d\n",
 		       count_of_bits - 1);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
index f005ba2b41ec..fb7703413be7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ void tests_cleanup(void)
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
 	bool has_ben = false, mbm_test = true, mba_test = true, cmt_test = true;
-	int res, c, cpu_no = 1, span = 250, argc_new = argc, i, no_of_bits = 5;
+	int res, c, cpu_no = 1, span = 250, argc_new = argc, i, no_of_bits = 0;
 	char *benchmark_cmd[BENCHMARK_ARGS], bw_report[64], bm_type[64];
 	char benchmark_cmd_area[BENCHMARK_ARGS][BENCHMARK_ARG_SIZE];
 	int ben_ind, ben_count;
@@ -106,6 +106,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 			break;
 		case 'n':
 			no_of_bits = atoi(optarg);
+			if (no_of_bits <= 0) {
+				printf("Bail out! invalid argument for no_of_bits\n");
+				return -1;
+			}
 			break;
 		case 'h':
 			cmd_help();
@@ -188,7 +192,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		printf("# Starting CMT test ...\n");
 		if (!has_ben)
 			sprintf(benchmark_cmd[5], "%s", "cmt");
-		res = cmt_resctrl_val(cpu_no, no_of_bits, benchmark_cmd);
+		res = cmt_resctrl_val(cpu_no, 5, benchmark_cmd);
 		printf("%sok CMT: test\n", res ? "not " : "");
 		cmt_test_cleanup();
 		tests_run++;
-- 
2.19.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2 14/19] selftests/resctrl: Skip the test if requested resctrl feature is not supported
  2020-05-18 22:08 [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 13/19] selftests/resctrl: Dynamically select buffer size for CAT test Sai Praneeth Prakhya
@ 2020-05-18 22:08 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-20 23:46   ` Reinette Chatre
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 15/19] selftests/resctrl: Change return type of umount_resctrlfs() to void Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya @ 2020-05-18 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, tony.luck, reinette.chatre, babu.moger,
	james.morse, ravi.v.shankar, fenghua.yu, x86, linux-kernel,
	dan.carpenter, dcb314, Sai Praneeth Prakhya

Presently, if a requested resctrl feature is not supported by H/W or is
disabled by user through kernel command line, the test suite treats it as
an error and hence would print something like "not ok MBA: schemata
change". But, not supporting a feature isn't a test error and hence
shouldn't printed as a failure.

So, instead of treating it as an error, use the SKIP directive of TAP
protocol and print it as below i.e. don't report it as test failure.

Sample o/p if CAT isn't supported:
"ok CAT # SKIP Hardware does not support CAT or CAT is disabled"

Suggested-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c    |  3 ---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c    |  3 ---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c    |  3 ---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c    |  3 ---
 .../testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
index 1bce84e23783..a18a37ce626c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
@@ -132,9 +132,6 @@ int cat_perf_miss_val(int cpu_no, int n, char *cache_type)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	if (!validate_resctrl_feature_request("cat"))
-		return -1;
-
 	/* Get default cbm mask for L3/L2 cache */
 	ret = get_cbm_mask(cache_type);
 	if (ret)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
index 282ba7fcf17c..119ae65abec7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
@@ -122,9 +122,6 @@ int cmt_resctrl_val(int cpu_no, int n, char **benchmark_cmd)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	if (!validate_resctrl_feature_request("cmt"))
-		return -1;
-
 	ret = get_cbm_mask("L3");
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
index ba0234d4829e..6f09d46a5424 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
@@ -156,9 +156,6 @@ int mba_schemata_change(int cpu_no, char *bw_report, char **benchmark_cmd)
 
 	remove(RESULT_FILE_NAME);
 
-	if (!validate_resctrl_feature_request("mba"))
-		return -1;
-
 	ret = resctrl_val(benchmark_cmd, &param);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
index ca610c3ebc8c..cb3113cb3b10 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
@@ -129,9 +129,6 @@ int mbm_bw_change(int span, int cpu_no, char *bw_report, char **benchmark_cmd)
 
 	remove(RESULT_FILE_NAME);
 
-	if (!validate_resctrl_feature_request("mbm"))
-		return -1;
-
 	ret = resctrl_val(benchmark_cmd, &param);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
index fb7703413be7..d45ae004ed77 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
@@ -170,6 +170,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 
 	if (!is_amd && mbm_test) {
 		printf("# Starting MBM BW change ...\n");
+		if (!validate_resctrl_feature_request("mbm")) {
+			printf("ok MBM # SKIP Hardware does not support MBM or MBM is disabled\n");
+			goto test_mba;
+		}
 		if (!has_ben)
 			sprintf(benchmark_cmd[5], "%s", "mba");
 		res = mbm_bw_change(span, cpu_no, bw_report, benchmark_cmd);
@@ -178,8 +182,13 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		tests_run++;
 	}
 
+test_mba:
 	if (!is_amd && mba_test) {
 		printf("# Starting MBA Schemata change ...\n");
+		if (!validate_resctrl_feature_request("mba")) {
+			printf("ok MBA # SKIP Hardware does not support MBA or MBA is disabled\n");
+			goto test_cmt;
+		}
 		if (!has_ben)
 			sprintf(benchmark_cmd[1], "%d", span);
 		res = mba_schemata_change(cpu_no, bw_report, benchmark_cmd);
@@ -188,8 +197,13 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		tests_run++;
 	}
 
+test_cmt:
 	if (cmt_test) {
 		printf("# Starting CMT test ...\n");
+		if (!validate_resctrl_feature_request("cmt")) {
+			printf("ok CMT # SKIP Hardware does not support CMT or CMT is disabled\n");
+			goto test_cat;
+		}
 		if (!has_ben)
 			sprintf(benchmark_cmd[5], "%s", "cmt");
 		res = cmt_resctrl_val(cpu_no, 5, benchmark_cmd);
@@ -198,8 +212,13 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		tests_run++;
 	}
 
+test_cat:
 	if (cat_test) {
 		printf("# Starting CAT test ...\n");
+		if (!validate_resctrl_feature_request("cat")) {
+			printf("ok CAT # SKIP Hardware does not support CAT or CAT is disabled\n");
+			goto out;
+		}
 		res = cat_perf_miss_val(cpu_no, no_of_bits, "L3");
 		printf("%sok CAT: test\n", res ? "not " : "");
 		tests_run++;
-- 
2.19.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2 15/19] selftests/resctrl: Change return type of umount_resctrlfs() to void
  2020-05-18 22:08 [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 14/19] selftests/resctrl: Skip the test if requested resctrl feature is not supported Sai Praneeth Prakhya
@ 2020-05-18 22:08 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-20 23:52   ` Reinette Chatre
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 16/19] selftests/resctrl: Umount resctrl FS only if mounted Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya @ 2020-05-18 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, tony.luck, reinette.chatre, babu.moger,
	james.morse, ravi.v.shankar, fenghua.yu, x86, linux-kernel,
	dan.carpenter, dcb314, Sai Praneeth Prakhya

umount_resctrlfs() is used only during tear down path and there is nothing
much to do if unmount of resctrl file system fails, so, all the callers of
this function are not checking for the return value. Hence, change the
return type of this function from int to void.

Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h   | 2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c | 9 ++-------
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
index 65ca24bf3eac..23b691001f0b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ bool check_resctrlfs_support(void);
 int filter_dmesg(void);
 int remount_resctrlfs(bool mum_resctrlfs);
 int get_resource_id(int cpu_no, int *resource_id);
-int umount_resctrlfs(void);
+void umount_resctrlfs(void);
 int validate_bw_report_request(char *bw_report);
 bool validate_resctrl_feature_request(const char *resctrl_val);
 char *fgrep(FILE *inf, const char *str);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
index 05956319d9ce..83cd3b026c52 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
@@ -90,15 +90,10 @@ int remount_resctrlfs(bool mum_resctrlfs)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-int umount_resctrlfs(void)
+void umount_resctrlfs(void)
 {
-	if (umount(RESCTRL_PATH)) {
+	if (umount(RESCTRL_PATH))
 		perror("# Unable to umount resctrl");
-
-		return errno;
-	}
-
-	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.19.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2 16/19] selftests/resctrl: Umount resctrl FS only if mounted
  2020-05-18 22:08 [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 15/19] selftests/resctrl: Change return type of umount_resctrlfs() to void Sai Praneeth Prakhya
@ 2020-05-18 22:08 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 17/19] selftests/resctrl: Unmount resctrl FS after running all tests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya @ 2020-05-18 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, tony.luck, reinette.chatre, babu.moger,
	james.morse, ravi.v.shankar, fenghua.yu, x86, linux-kernel,
	dan.carpenter, dcb314, Sai Praneeth Prakhya

Currently, umount_resctrlfs() directly attempts to unmount resctrl FS
without checking if resctrl FS is already mounted or not. But, there
could be situations where-in the caller might not know if resctrl FS is
already mounted or not. The caller might want to unmount resctrl FS _only_
if it's already mounted.

Hence, change umount_resctrlfs() such that it now first checks if resctrl
FS is mounted or not and unmounts resctrl FS only if it's already mounted
and does nothing if it's not mounted.

Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
index 83cd3b026c52..ebc8e3b4f7ff 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
@@ -92,8 +92,10 @@ int remount_resctrlfs(bool mum_resctrlfs)
 
 void umount_resctrlfs(void)
 {
-	if (umount(RESCTRL_PATH))
-		perror("# Unable to umount resctrl");
+	if (!find_resctrl_mount(NULL)) {
+		if (umount(RESCTRL_PATH))
+			perror("# Unable to umount resctrl");
+	}
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.19.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2 17/19] selftests/resctrl: Unmount resctrl FS after running all tests
  2020-05-18 22:08 [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (15 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 16/19] selftests/resctrl: Umount resctrl FS only if mounted Sai Praneeth Prakhya
@ 2020-05-18 22:08 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 18/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix incorrect parsing of iMC counters Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya @ 2020-05-18 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, tony.luck, reinette.chatre, babu.moger,
	james.morse, ravi.v.shankar, fenghua.yu, x86, linux-kernel,
	dan.carpenter, dcb314, Sai Praneeth Prakhya

validate_resctrl_feature_request() would mount resctrl FS (if not already
mounted) to check if a requested feature is supported by the platform or
not. There could be situations where in all the resctrl tests are skipped
and hence main() function would return leaving the resctrl FS mounted.

To avoid resctrl FS being mounted, unmount resctrl FS before returning.
This shouldn't have any impact on the cases where all the tests might get
to run (or some of the test cases might get to run and the individual tests
unmount resctrl FS) because umount_resctrlfs() attempts to unmount
resctrl FS only if it's mounted.

Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
index d45ae004ed77..a0c14555d259 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
@@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 	}
 
 out:
+	umount_resctrlfs();
 	printf("1..%d\n", tests_run);
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.19.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2 18/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix incorrect parsing of iMC counters
  2020-05-18 22:08 [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (16 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 17/19] selftests/resctrl: Unmount resctrl FS after running all tests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
@ 2020-05-18 22:08 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 19/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix checking for < 0 for unsigned values Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-21 16:12 ` [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Reinette Chatre
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya @ 2020-05-18 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, tony.luck, reinette.chatre, babu.moger,
	james.morse, ravi.v.shankar, fenghua.yu, x86, linux-kernel,
	dan.carpenter, dcb314, Sai Praneeth Prakhya

iMC (Integrated Memory Controller) counters are usually at
"/sys/bus/event_source/devices/" and are named as "uncore_imc_<n>".
num_of_imcs() function tries to count number of such iMC counters so that
it could appropriately initialize required number of perf_attr structures
that could be used to read these iMC counters.

The present code assumes that all the directories under this path that
start with "uncore_imc" are iMC counters. But, on some systems there could
be directories named as "uncore_imc_free_running" which aren't iMC
counters. Trying to read from such directory would result in "not found
file" errors and MBM/MBA tests would fail.

Hence, change the logic in num_of_imcs() such that it looks at the first
character after "uncore_imc_" to check if it's a numerical digit or not. If
it's a digit then the directory represents an iMC counter, else, skip the
directory.

Reported-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
index 270cd95e0026..94f3a34e21bb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static int read_from_imc_dir(char *imc_dir, int count)
 static int num_of_imcs(void)
 {
 	unsigned int count = 0;
-	char imc_dir[512];
+	char imc_dir[512], *temp;
 	struct dirent *ep;
 	int ret;
 	DIR *dp;
@@ -230,7 +230,25 @@ static int num_of_imcs(void)
 	dp = opendir(DYN_PMU_PATH);
 	if (dp) {
 		while ((ep = readdir(dp))) {
-			if (strstr(ep->d_name, UNCORE_IMC)) {
+			temp = strstr(ep->d_name, UNCORE_IMC);
+			if (!temp)
+				continue;
+
+			/*
+			 * imc counters are named as "uncore_imc_<n>", hence
+			 * increment the pointer to point to <n>. Note that
+			 * sizeof(UNCORE_IMC) would count for null character as
+			 * well and hence the last underscore character in
+			 * uncore_imc'_' need not be counted.
+			 */
+			temp = temp + sizeof(UNCORE_IMC);
+
+			/*
+			 * Some directories under "DYN_PMU_PATH" could have
+			 * names like "uncore_imc_free_running", hence, check if
+			 * first character is a numerical digit or not.
+			 */
+			if (temp[0] >= '0' && temp[0] <= '9') {
 				sprintf(imc_dir, "%s/%s/", DYN_PMU_PATH,
 					ep->d_name);
 				ret = read_from_imc_dir(imc_dir, count);
-- 
2.19.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2 19/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix checking for < 0 for unsigned values
  2020-05-18 22:08 [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (17 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 18/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix incorrect parsing of iMC counters Sai Praneeth Prakhya
@ 2020-05-18 22:08 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
  2020-05-21 16:12 ` [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Reinette Chatre
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya @ 2020-05-18 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, tony.luck, reinette.chatre, babu.moger,
	james.morse, ravi.v.shankar, fenghua.yu, x86, linux-kernel,
	dan.carpenter, dcb314, Sai Praneeth Prakhya

Dan reported that he noticed following static checker warnings

	tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c:545 measure_vals()
	warn: 'bw_imc' unsigned <= 0

	tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c:549 measure_vals()
	warn: 'bw_resc_end' unsigned <= 0

These warnings are reported because
1. measure_vals() declares 'bw_imc' and 'bw_resc_end' as unsigned long
   variables
2. Return value of get_mem_bw_imc() and get_mem_bw_resctrl() are assigned
   to 'bw_imc' and 'bw_resc_end' respectively
3. The return values are checked for <=0 to see if the calls were
   successful or not

Checking for < 0 for an unsigned value doesn't make any sense. So, to
fix this issue, change the implementation of get_mem_bw_imc() and
get_mem_bw_resctrl() such that they now accept reference to a variable
and set the variable appropriately upon success and return 0, else return
<0 on error.

Fixes: 7f4d257e3a2a: "selftests/resctrl: Add callback to start a benchmark"
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c | 33 ++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
index 94f3a34e21bb..003457b16ce7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
@@ -300,9 +300,9 @@ static int initialize_mem_bw_imc(void)
  * Memory B/W utilized by a process on a socket can be calculated using
  * iMC counters. Perf events are used to read these counters.
  *
- * Return: >= 0 on success. < 0 on failure.
+ * Return: = 0 on success. < 0 on failure.
  */
-static float get_mem_bw_imc(int cpu_no, char *bw_report)
+static int get_mem_bw_imc(int cpu_no, char *bw_report, float *bw_imc)
 {
 	float reads, writes, of_mul_read, of_mul_write;
 	int imc, j, ret;
@@ -374,12 +374,13 @@ static float get_mem_bw_imc(int cpu_no, char *bw_report)
 	}
 
 	if (strcmp(bw_report, "reads") == 0)
-		return reads;
+		*bw_imc = reads;
 
 	if (strcmp(bw_report, "writes") == 0)
-		return writes;
+		*bw_imc = writes;
 
-	return (reads + writes);
+	*bw_imc = reads + writes;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 void set_mbm_path(const char *ctrlgrp, const char *mongrp, int resource_id)
@@ -438,9 +439,8 @@ static void initialize_mem_bw_resctrl(const char *ctrlgrp, const char *mongrp,
  * 1. If con_mon grp is given, then read from it
  * 2. If con_mon grp is not given, then read from root con_mon grp
  */
-static unsigned long get_mem_bw_resctrl(void)
+static int get_mem_bw_resctrl(unsigned long *mbm_total)
 {
-	unsigned long mbm_total = 0;
 	FILE *fp;
 
 	fp = fopen(mbm_total_path, "r");
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static unsigned long get_mem_bw_resctrl(void)
 
 		return -1;
 	}
-	if (fscanf(fp, "%lu", &mbm_total) <= 0) {
+	if (fscanf(fp, "%lu", mbm_total) <= 0) {
 		perror("Could not get mbm local bytes");
 		fclose(fp);
 
@@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ static unsigned long get_mem_bw_resctrl(void)
 	}
 	fclose(fp);
 
-	return mbm_total;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 pid_t bm_pid, ppid;
@@ -549,7 +549,8 @@ static void initialize_llc_occu_resctrl(const char *ctrlgrp, const char *mongrp,
 static int
 measure_vals(struct resctrl_val_param *param, unsigned long *bw_resc_start)
 {
-	unsigned long bw_imc, bw_resc, bw_resc_end;
+	unsigned long bw_resc, bw_resc_end;
+	float bw_imc;
 	int ret;
 
 	/*
@@ -559,13 +560,13 @@ measure_vals(struct resctrl_val_param *param, unsigned long *bw_resc_start)
 	 * Compare the two values to validate resctrl value.
 	 * It takes 1sec to measure the data.
 	 */
-	bw_imc = get_mem_bw_imc(param->cpu_no, param->bw_report);
-	if (bw_imc <= 0)
-		return bw_imc;
+	ret = get_mem_bw_imc(param->cpu_no, param->bw_report, &bw_imc);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
 
-	bw_resc_end = get_mem_bw_resctrl();
-	if (bw_resc_end <= 0)
-		return bw_resc_end;
+	ret = get_mem_bw_resctrl(&bw_resc_end);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
 
 	bw_resc = (bw_resc_end - *bw_resc_start) / MB;
 	ret = print_results_bw(param->filename, bm_pid, bw_imc, bw_resc);
-- 
2.19.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2 14/19] selftests/resctrl: Skip the test if requested resctrl feature is not supported
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 14/19] selftests/resctrl: Skip the test if requested resctrl feature is not supported Sai Praneeth Prakhya
@ 2020-05-20 23:46   ` Reinette Chatre
  2020-05-21 17:12     ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread
From: Reinette Chatre @ 2020-05-20 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sai Praneeth Prakhya, shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, tony.luck, babu.moger, james.morse,
	ravi.v.shankar, fenghua.yu, x86, linux-kernel, dan.carpenter,
	dcb314

Hi Sai,

On 5/18/2020 3:08 PM, Sai Praneeth Prakhya wrote:
> Presently, if a requested resctrl feature is not supported by H/W or is
> disabled by user through kernel command line, the test suite treats it as
> an error and hence would print something like "not ok MBA: schemata
> change". But, not supporting a feature isn't a test error and hence
> shouldn't printed as a failure.
> 
> So, instead of treating it as an error, use the SKIP directive of TAP
> protocol and print it as below i.e. don't report it as test failure.
> 
> Sample o/p if CAT isn't supported:
> "ok CAT # SKIP Hardware does not support CAT or CAT is disabled"
> 
> Suggested-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
> ---

...

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
> index fb7703413be7..d45ae004ed77 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
> @@ -170,6 +170,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  
>  	if (!is_amd && mbm_test) {
>  		printf("# Starting MBM BW change ...\n");
> +		if (!validate_resctrl_feature_request("mbm")) {
> +			printf("ok MBM # SKIP Hardware does not support MBM or MBM is disabled\n");
> +			goto test_mba;
> +		}
>  		if (!has_ben)
>  			sprintf(benchmark_cmd[5], "%s", "mba");
>  		res = mbm_bw_change(span, cpu_no, bw_report, benchmark_cmd);
> @@ -178,8 +182,13 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  		tests_run++;
>  	}
>  
> +test_mba:

I think this particular usage of goto could make the flow of the code
harder to trace. Could the tests perhaps be moved to functions to avoid
needing to jump like this? Perhaps there could be a new function per
test, like run_mbm_test(), run_mba_test(), etc. with each test called
when requested by user and with the test exiting cleanly if feature is
not supported by the hardware.

Reinette

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2 15/19] selftests/resctrl: Change return type of umount_resctrlfs() to void
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 15/19] selftests/resctrl: Change return type of umount_resctrlfs() to void Sai Praneeth Prakhya
@ 2020-05-20 23:52   ` Reinette Chatre
  2020-05-21 17:19     ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread
From: Reinette Chatre @ 2020-05-20 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sai Praneeth Prakhya, shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, tony.luck, babu.moger, james.morse,
	ravi.v.shankar, fenghua.yu, x86, linux-kernel, dan.carpenter,
	dcb314

Hi Sai,

On 5/18/2020 3:08 PM, Sai Praneeth Prakhya wrote:
> umount_resctrlfs() is used only during tear down path and there is nothing
> much to do if unmount of resctrl file system fails, so, all the callers of
> this function are not checking for the return value. Hence, change the
> return type of this function from int to void.

Should the callers be ignoring the return value? From what I can tell
the filesystem is unmounted between test runs so I wonder if it may help
if the return code is used and the test exits with an appropriate error
to user space for possible investigation instead of attempting to run a
new test on top of the resctrl filesystem that could potentially be
having issues at the time.

Reinette

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests
  2020-05-18 22:08 [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
                   ` (18 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 19/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix checking for < 0 for unsigned values Sai Praneeth Prakhya
@ 2020-05-21 16:12 ` Reinette Chatre
  2020-05-21 17:28   ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
  19 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread
From: Reinette Chatre @ 2020-05-21 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sai Praneeth Prakhya, shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, tony.luck, babu.moger, james.morse,
	ravi.v.shankar, fenghua.yu, x86, LKML, dan.carpenter, dcb314

Hi Sai,

On 5/18/2020 3:08 PM, Sai Praneeth Prakhya wrote:
> Fenghua Yu (1):
>   selftests/resctrl: Fix missing options "-n" and "-p"
> 
> Reinette Chatre (3):
>   selftests/resctrl: Fix typo
>   selftests/resctrl: Fix typo in help text
>   selftests/resctrl: Ensure sibling CPU is not same as original CPU
> 
> Sai Praneeth Prakhya (15):
>   selftests/resctrl: Rename CQM test as CMT test
>   selftests/resctrl: Declare global variables as extern
>   selftests/resctrl: Return if resctrl file system is not supported
>   selftests/resctrl: Check for resctrl mount point only if resctrl FS is
>     supported
>   selftests/resctrl: Use resctrl/info for feature detection
>   selftests/resctrl: Fix MBA/MBM results reporting format
>   selftests/resctrl: Abort running tests if not root user
>   selftests/resctrl: Enable gcc checks to detect buffer overflows
>   selftests/resctrl: Dynamically select buffer size for CAT test
>   selftests/resctrl: Skip the test if requested resctrl feature is not
>     supported
>   selftests/resctrl: Change return type of umount_resctrlfs() to void
>   selftests/resctrl: Umount resctrl FS only if mounted
>   selftests/resctrl: Unmount resctrl FS after running all tests
>   selftests/resctrl: Fix incorrect parsing of iMC counters
>   selftests/resctrl: Fix checking for < 0 for unsigned values
> 
>  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/Makefile      |  2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/README        |  4 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cache.c       |  4 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c    |  8 +-
>  .../resctrl/{cqm_test.c => cmt_test.c}        | 23 +++---
>  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c    | 23 +++---
>  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c    | 16 ++--
>  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h     | 20 +++--
>  .../testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c | 69 ++++++++++++-----
>  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c | 67 ++++++++++------
>  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c   | 77 +++++++++++++------
>  11 files changed, 195 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)
>  rename tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/{cqm_test.c => cmt_test.c} (88%)
> 

Thank you very much for creating these fixes. There are a few to which I
responded directly, the rest look good to me.

Reinette

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH V2 14/19] selftests/resctrl: Skip the test if requested resctrl feature is not supported
  2020-05-20 23:46   ` Reinette Chatre
@ 2020-05-21 17:12     ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Prakhya, Sai Praneeth @ 2020-05-21 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chatre, Reinette, shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, Luck, Tony, babu.moger, james.morse, Shankar,
	Ravi V, Yu, Fenghua, x86, linux-kernel, dan.carpenter, dcb314

Hi Reinette,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 4:46 PM
> To: Prakhya, Sai Praneeth <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>;
> shuah@kernel.org; skhan@linuxfoundation.org; linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: tglx@linutronix.de; mingo@redhat.com; bp@alien8.de; Luck, Tony
> <tony.luck@intel.com>; babu.moger@amd.com; james.morse@arm.com;
> Shankar, Ravi V <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>; Yu, Fenghua
> <fenghua.yu@intel.com>; x86@kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel;
> dan.carpenter@oracle.com; dcb314@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 14/19] selftests/resctrl: Skip the test if requested resctrl
> feature is not supported
> 
> Hi Sai,

[SNIP]

> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
> > b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
> > index fb7703413be7..d45ae004ed77 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
> > @@ -170,6 +170,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> >
> >  	if (!is_amd && mbm_test) {
> >  		printf("# Starting MBM BW change ...\n");
> > +		if (!validate_resctrl_feature_request("mbm")) {
> > +			printf("ok MBM # SKIP Hardware does not support
> MBM or MBM is disabled\n");
> > +			goto test_mba;
> > +		}
> >  		if (!has_ben)
> >  			sprintf(benchmark_cmd[5], "%s", "mba");
> >  		res = mbm_bw_change(span, cpu_no, bw_report,
> benchmark_cmd); @@
> > -178,8 +182,13 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> >  		tests_run++;
> >  	}
> >
> > +test_mba:
> 
> I think this particular usage of goto could make the flow of the code harder to
> trace. Could the tests perhaps be moved to functions to avoid needing to jump
> like this? Perhaps there could be a new function per test, like run_mbm_test(),
> run_mba_test(), etc. with each test called when requested by user and with the
> test exiting cleanly if feature is not supported by the hardware.

Makes sense. I will change it as suggested.

Regards,
Sai

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH V2 15/19] selftests/resctrl: Change return type of umount_resctrlfs() to void
  2020-05-20 23:52   ` Reinette Chatre
@ 2020-05-21 17:19     ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
  2020-05-21 18:15       ` Reinette Chatre
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread
From: Prakhya, Sai Praneeth @ 2020-05-21 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chatre, Reinette, shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, Luck, Tony, babu.moger, james.morse, Shankar,
	Ravi V, Yu, Fenghua, x86, linux-kernel, dan.carpenter, dcb314

Hi Reinette,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 4:52 PM
> To: Prakhya, Sai Praneeth <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>;
> shuah@kernel.org; skhan@linuxfoundation.org; linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: tglx@linutronix.de; mingo@redhat.com; bp@alien8.de; Luck, Tony
> <tony.luck@intel.com>; babu.moger@amd.com; james.morse@arm.com;
> Shankar, Ravi V <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>; Yu, Fenghua
> <fenghua.yu@intel.com>; x86@kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel;
> dan.carpenter@oracle.com; dcb314@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 15/19] selftests/resctrl: Change return type of
> umount_resctrlfs() to void
> 
> Hi Sai,
> 
> On 5/18/2020 3:08 PM, Sai Praneeth Prakhya wrote:
> > umount_resctrlfs() is used only during tear down path and there is
> > nothing much to do if unmount of resctrl file system fails, so, all
> > the callers of this function are not checking for the return value.
> > Hence, change the return type of this function from int to void.
> 
> Should the callers be ignoring the return value? From what I can tell the
> filesystem is unmounted between test runs so I wonder if it may help if the
> return code is used and the test exits with an appropriate error to user space for
> possible investigation instead of attempting to run a new test on top of the
> resctrl filesystem that could potentially be having issues at the time.

Makes sense to me to check for the return value of umount() and take appropriate
action rather than ignoring it. But, since this might happen very rarely (I haven't
noticed umount() failing till now), I am thinking to queue this up for cleanup series.
What do you think?

This bug fixes series will then have patches 16 and 17 because they are fixing a bug
that could be easily noticed. Please let me know if you think otherwise.

Regards,
Sai

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests
  2020-05-21 16:12 ` [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Reinette Chatre
@ 2020-05-21 17:28   ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Prakhya, Sai Praneeth @ 2020-05-21 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chatre, Reinette, shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, Luck, Tony, babu.moger, james.morse, Shankar,
	Ravi V, Yu, Fenghua, x86, LKML, dan.carpenter, dcb314

Hi Reinette,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 9:12 AM
> To: Prakhya, Sai Praneeth <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>;
> shuah@kernel.org; skhan@linuxfoundation.org; linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: tglx@linutronix.de; mingo@redhat.com; bp@alien8.de; Luck, Tony
> <tony.luck@intel.com>; babu.moger@amd.com; james.morse@arm.com;
> Shankar, Ravi V <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>; Yu, Fenghua
> <fenghua.yu@intel.com>; x86@kernel.org; LKML <linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org>; dan.carpenter@oracle.com; dcb314@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests
> 
> Hi Sai,
> 
> On 5/18/2020 3:08 PM, Sai Praneeth Prakhya wrote:
> > Fenghua Yu (1):
> >   selftests/resctrl: Fix missing options "-n" and "-p"

[SNIP]

> Thank you very much for creating these fixes. There are a few to which I
> responded directly, the rest look good to me.

Thanks a lot! for reviewing the patches. I will post a V3 addressing your comments.

Regards,
Sai

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2 15/19] selftests/resctrl: Change return type of umount_resctrlfs() to void
  2020-05-21 17:19     ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
@ 2020-05-21 18:15       ` Reinette Chatre
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Reinette Chatre @ 2020-05-21 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Prakhya, Sai Praneeth, shuah, skhan, linux-kselftest
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, Luck, Tony, babu.moger, james.morse, Shankar,
	Ravi V, Yu, Fenghua, x86, LKML, dan.carpenter, dcb314

Hi Sai,

On 5/21/2020 10:19 AM, Prakhya, Sai Praneeth wrote:
> Hi Reinette,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 4:52 PM
>> To: Prakhya, Sai Praneeth <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>;
>> shuah@kernel.org; skhan@linuxfoundation.org; linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: tglx@linutronix.de; mingo@redhat.com; bp@alien8.de; Luck, Tony
>> <tony.luck@intel.com>; babu.moger@amd.com; james.morse@arm.com;
>> Shankar, Ravi V <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>; Yu, Fenghua
>> <fenghua.yu@intel.com>; x86@kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel;
>> dan.carpenter@oracle.com; dcb314@hotmail.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 15/19] selftests/resctrl: Change return type of
>> umount_resctrlfs() to void
>>
>> Hi Sai,
>>
>> On 5/18/2020 3:08 PM, Sai Praneeth Prakhya wrote:
>>> umount_resctrlfs() is used only during tear down path and there is
>>> nothing much to do if unmount of resctrl file system fails, so, all
>>> the callers of this function are not checking for the return value.
>>> Hence, change the return type of this function from int to void.
>>
>> Should the callers be ignoring the return value? From what I can tell the
>> filesystem is unmounted between test runs so I wonder if it may help if the
>> return code is used and the test exits with an appropriate error to user space for
>> possible investigation instead of attempting to run a new test on top of the
>> resctrl filesystem that could potentially be having issues at the time.
> 
> Makes sense to me to check for the return value of umount() and take appropriate
> action rather than ignoring it. But, since this might happen very rarely (I haven't
> noticed umount() failing till now), I am thinking to queue this up for cleanup series.
> What do you think?

That sounds good.

> 
> This bug fixes series will then have patches 16 and 17 because they are fixing a bug
> that could be easily noticed. Please let me know if you think otherwise.

I don't, dropping this change that makes it easy to ignore an error in
this round so that any errors could be dealt with better in a later
patch sounds good to me.

Thank you

Reinette


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-21 18:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-18 22:08 [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 01/19] selftests/resctrl: Rename CQM test as CMT test Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 02/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix typo Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 03/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix typo in help text Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 04/19] selftests/resctrl: Declare global variables as extern Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 05/19] selftests/resctrl: Return if resctrl file system is not supported Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 06/19] selftests/resctrl: Check for resctrl mount point only if resctrl FS is supported Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 07/19] selftests/resctrl: Use resctrl/info for feature detection Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 08/19] selftests/resctrl: Ensure sibling CPU is not same as original CPU Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 09/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix missing options "-n" and "-p" Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 10/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix MBA/MBM results reporting format Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 11/19] selftests/resctrl: Abort running tests if not root user Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 12/19] selftests/resctrl: Enable gcc checks to detect buffer overflows Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 13/19] selftests/resctrl: Dynamically select buffer size for CAT test Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 14/19] selftests/resctrl: Skip the test if requested resctrl feature is not supported Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-05-20 23:46   ` Reinette Chatre
2020-05-21 17:12     ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 15/19] selftests/resctrl: Change return type of umount_resctrlfs() to void Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-05-20 23:52   ` Reinette Chatre
2020-05-21 17:19     ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2020-05-21 18:15       ` Reinette Chatre
2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 16/19] selftests/resctrl: Umount resctrl FS only if mounted Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 17/19] selftests/resctrl: Unmount resctrl FS after running all tests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 18/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix incorrect parsing of iMC counters Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-05-18 22:08 ` [PATCH V2 19/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix checking for < 0 for unsigned values Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-05-21 16:12 ` [PATCH V2 00/19] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Reinette Chatre
2020-05-21 17:28   ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).