From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918B1C4360C for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 19:01:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6062084D for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 19:01:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725932AbfJDTBU (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:01:20 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:34874 "EHLO smtp1.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725775AbfJDTBU (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:01:20 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 331 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 15:01:19 EDT Received: from rt.cvo.linuxfoundation.org (rt.cvo.linuxfoundation.org [172.17.192.131]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F62F735; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 18:55:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by rt.cvo.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 1AD13706; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 18:55:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Kernel.org Helpdesk #80110] Bugzilla Component for KUnit? From: "Konstantin Ryabitsev via RT" Reply-To: kernel-helpdesk@rt.linuxfoundation.org In-Reply-To: <20191002215351.GA177672@google.com> References: <20191002215351.GA177672@google.com> Message-ID: X-RT-Loop-Prevention: linuxfoundation.org X-RT-Ticket: linuxfoundation.org #80110 X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.0 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/) X-RT-Originator: konstantin@linuxfoundation.org To: brendanhiggins@google.com CC: kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 14:55:48 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kselftest-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org On 2019-10-02 17:53:58, brendanhiggins@google.com wrote: > Hi, > > I am thinking about requesting a Bugzilla component for my kernel > project KUnit. I am not sure if this is the right place for it. Some > background on KUnit: We are working on adding unit testing for the > Linux > kernel[1][2]. We have our initial patchset that introduces the > subsystem > in the process of being merged (Linus sent our PR back to us for a > minor > fix[3], so it should be in either 5.4-rc2 or 5.5, but is nevertheless > in > linux-next). However, we also have a staging repo that people are > using > and some supporting code that lives outside of the kernel. > > So I am trying to figure out: > > 1. Is it appropriate to request a Bugzilla component before our > subsystem has been merged into torvalds/master? I would just wait, > but I have some users looking to file issues, so I would prefer to > provide them something sooner rather than later. > > 2. Is it appropriate to use the kernel's Bugzilla to track issues > outside of the Linux kernel? As I mention above, we have code that > lives outside of the kernel; is it appropriate to use kernel.org's > Bugzilla for this? > > 3. Does Bugzilla match my planned usage model? It doesn't look like > Bugzilla get's much usage aside from reporting bugs. I want to use > it for tracking feature progress and things like that. Is that > okay? Yes, we can certainly host this on bugzilla.kernel.org. Would you be okay with Tools/KUnit as product/category? Regards, -- Konstantin Ryabitsev Director, LF Projects IT The Linux Foundation