From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC274C433E1 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 20:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47B3207C4 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 20:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="CHhc68ph" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726310AbgGWUzF (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2020 16:55:05 -0400 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.249]:51962 "EHLO lelv0142.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726063AbgGWUzE (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2020 16:55:04 -0400 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06NKssYa094338; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 15:54:54 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1595537694; bh=a08ZrlhXg1JMq4HYLTw9jqCMrn0ohoTX+er5X8D6D4I=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=CHhc68phBwfLqm0YNQjlXDzzC/WwcB68ph8ADpMb1FupoCvqEfgfnpra/J11s3gSA 46s5/UNXMgNId0nvXlayRbDjyO2kiOP9P9EJgKJFaXii8B/V8fbUFQAIEGzbV3odnC 32K68dkfnaly70eXKbpJPcLKmUB9A+eeWSZzgQ44= Received: from DFLE104.ent.ti.com (dfle104.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.25]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 06NKssRc034549 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 23 Jul 2020 15:54:54 -0500 Received: from DFLE102.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.23) by DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 15:54:53 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DFLE102.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 15:54:54 -0500 Received: from [10.250.35.192] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06NKsr8U027944; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 15:54:53 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: add orange color To: Pavel Machek , Jacek Anaszewski CC: =?UTF-8?Q?Marek_Beh=c3=ban?= , References: <20200723125751.4045-1-marek.behun@nic.cz> <20200723193908.GA26165@amd> <57981a86-dd1b-09ee-8035-4c84d4c990df@gmail.com> <30b1f173-c687-9fe2-92bd-fc53f776cb77@gmail.com> <20200723201657.nb5dm2aqmjnizmpq@duo.ucw.cz> <8b36be51-3a75-458d-4fed-d730621e1547@gmail.com> <20200723203953.iijldzbnfqh36mex@duo.ucw.cz> From: Dan Murphy Message-ID: <158418af-dd48-65e3-2349-14b1e9792501@ti.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 15:54:53 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200723203953.iijldzbnfqh36mex@duo.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-leds-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org Hi On 7/23/20 3:39 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >>>>>>> Many network devices have LEDs with green and orange color, instead of >>>>>>> green and yellow. >>>>>> Is it likely that we see device having both yellow and orange LEDs? >>>>> Why should we? >>>> This question actually refers to the below sentence... >>>> >>>>>> I'd simply lie and say those LEDs are yellow... >>>> So, why do you think we should strive to limit the number >>>> of color definitions? >>> Because there's infinitely many colors :-). And programmers are bad at >>> differentiating them. You can't really tell wavelength of light by >>> looking at it. >>> >>> I mean.. yes, maybe we can add orange, pink, green-blue, violet, >>> ... white at different temperatures ... >>> >>> It will be rather long list. >> I think that we should allow setting the LED color name after >> what manufacturer claims it is. > Well, someone can try to compile list of common colors, and convince > me that this list is good enough... > > ...but really, unless there's device where there are leds of > yellow/orange color... it may be easier to keep the current list. Marek indicated in his response to me that 2. many technical people know the names of at most 12 different colors, amber is not among them So maybe he can put the list together. Dan