From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68404C433EC for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 13:40:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36577207BB for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 13:40:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="MTdYypGt" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728265AbgGWNk1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2020 09:40:27 -0400 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]:46922 "EHLO lelv0143.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728066AbgGWNk0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2020 09:40:26 -0400 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06NDeAFl097701; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 08:40:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1595511610; bh=93PAb3rdnNuCAbhj8PCtfgeay7I68iTO1Kagpn+eA/c=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=MTdYypGtzeCv6gnVkGQ1muYkKbnJCJ/2s7TR61dHhOaw5NSwSZ1+l7rC1+4jCVi2W rYWQ7TMsQe++aTZt/fO0cbhENkNvED17gBU8p0w5QSNrHhn3lONMWtIKFJASJp2dJ/ 4VyVBqrleWuACZfpoX49chFej5/PNuAyWNYfNW5o= Received: from DLEE107.ent.ti.com (dlee107.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.37]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 06NDeA2t030807 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 23 Jul 2020 08:40:10 -0500 Received: from DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) by DLEE107.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 08:40:09 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 08:40:09 -0500 Received: from [10.250.35.192] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06NDe97U080447; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 08:40:09 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: add orange color To: =?UTF-8?Q?Marek_Beh=c3=ban?= , CC: Pavel Machek , References: <20200723125751.4045-1-marek.behun@nic.cz> From: Dan Murphy Message-ID: <1a8a489b-95e0-58a6-5454-1c45a7ef156c@ti.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 08:40:09 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200723125751.4045-1-marek.behun@nic.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-leds-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org Marek On 7/23/20 7:57 AM, Marek Behún wrote: > Many network devices have LEDs with green and orange color, instead of > green and yellow. Can't we use amber? Dan