linux-leds.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Guido Günther" <agx@sigxcpu.org>
To: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
Cc: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] leds: lm3692x: Don't overwrite return value in error path
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 14:15:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190921211525.GA8263@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2bde2870-08a3-38b9-9cd7-fee0e2107743@ti.com>

Hi Dan,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 06:48:59AM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Guido
> 
> On 9/20/19 12:27 AM, Guido Günther wrote:
> > The driver currently reports successful initialization on every failure
> > as long as it's able to power off the regulator. Don't check the return
> > value of regulator_disable to avoid that.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org>
> > ---
> >   drivers/leds/leds-lm3692x.c | 7 ++++---
> >   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lm3692x.c b/drivers/leds/leds-lm3692x.c
> > index 487228c2bed2..31115655f97b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/leds/leds-lm3692x.c
> > +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lm3692x.c
> > @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static int lm3692x_brightness_set(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
> >   static int lm3692x_init(struct lm3692x_led *led)
> >   {
> >   	int enable_state;
> > -	int ret;
> > +	int ret, ret2;
> >   	if (led->regulator) {
> >   		ret = regulator_enable(led->regulator);
> > @@ -313,14 +313,15 @@ static int lm3692x_init(struct lm3692x_led *led)
> >   		gpiod_direction_output(led->enable_gpio, 0);
> >   	if (led->regulator) {
> > -		ret = regulator_disable(led->regulator);
> > -		if (ret)
> > +		ret2 = regulator_disable(led->regulator);
> > +		if (ret2)
> >   			dev_err(&led->client->dev,
> >   				"Failed to disable regulator\n");
> 
> s/ret2/reg_ret
> 
> Like you did in patch 1 log the error code as well.
> 
> If regulator_disabled failed you might want to send that error code but
> either error returned is fine.

Changed in v3 - i opted to return the original error code since this is
likely what upper layers care about and only printk the regulator
failure one.
Thanks for the review,
 -- Guido

> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> >   	}
> >   	return ret;
> >   }
> > +
> >   static int lm3692x_probe_dt(struct lm3692x_led *led)
> >   {
> >   	struct fwnode_handle *child = NULL;
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-22 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-20  5:27 [PATCH v2 0/5] leds: lm3692x: Probing and flag fixes Guido Günther
2019-09-20  5:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] leds: lm3692x: Print error value on dev_err Guido Günther
2019-09-20  5:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] leds: lm3692x: Don't overwrite return value in error path Guido Günther
2019-09-20 11:47   ` Pavel Machek
2019-09-20 11:48   ` Dan Murphy
2019-09-21 21:15     ` Guido Günther [this message]
2019-09-20  5:27 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] leds: lm3692x: Handle failure to probe the regulator Guido Günther
2019-09-20  5:27 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] leds: lm3692x: Use flags from LM3692X_BOOST_CTRL Guido Günther
2019-09-20  5:27 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] leds: lm3692x: Use flags from LM3692X_BRT_CTRL Guido Günther

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190921211525.GA8263@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org \
    --to=agx@sigxcpu.org \
    --cc=dmurphy@ti.com \
    --cc=jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).