From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: "leds: gpio: Use generic support for composing LED names" breaks gpio debugfs
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 11:02:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191204110219.GV25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
Hi,
Patch d7235f5feaa0 ("leds: gpio: Use generic support for composing LED
names") changed the way labels are used.
devm_fwnode_get_gpiod_from_child() is passed led.name, which used to be
set to the label or node name, resulting in /sys/kernel/debug/gpio
containing useful information. For example:
gpio-487 ( |udpu:green:power ) out lo
gpio-488 ( |udpu:red:power ) out hi
gpio-489 ( |udpu:green:network ) out hi
gpio-490 ( |udpu:red:network ) out hi
gpio-491 ( |udpu:green:alarm ) out hi
gpio-492 ( |udpu:red:alarm ) out hi
After this commit, it now contains a rather less useful:
gpio-487 ( |? ) out hi ACTIVE LOW
gpio-488 ( |? ) out hi ACTIVE LOW
gpio-489 ( |? ) out hi ACTIVE LOW
gpio-490 ( |? ) out hi ACTIVE LOW
gpio-491 ( |? ) out hi ACTIVE LOW
gpio-492 ( |? ) out hi ACTIVE LOW
This is because led.name is now NULL prior to the call to
devm_fwnode_get_gpiod_from_child().
While this is not an API, it is useful for debugging, and given the
dynamic allocation of GPIOs to physical GPIOs, having the labels
present is an advantage.
Can this be fixed / old behaviour restored?
Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
next reply other threads:[~2019-12-04 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-04 11:02 Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2019-12-04 20:52 ` "leds: gpio: Use generic support for composing LED names" breaks gpio debugfs Jacek Anaszewski
2019-12-04 23:45 ` Linus Walleij
2019-12-05 21:29 ` Jacek Anaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191204110219.GV25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).