From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD0EC433DF for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 13:48:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B2B207BC for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 13:48:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728289AbgGKNsS (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jul 2020 09:48:18 -0400 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz ([46.255.230.98]:35894 "EHLO jabberwock.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727004AbgGKNsS (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jul 2020 09:48:18 -0400 Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 5D1471C0BD2; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 15:48:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 15:48:14 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Eddie James Cc: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, dmurphy@ti.com, jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com, vishwa@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: leds: pca955x: Add IBM implementation compatible string Message-ID: <20200711134814.GB6407@amd> References: <20200709201220.13736-1-eajames@linux.ibm.com> <20200709201220.13736-2-eajames@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200709201220.13736-2-eajames@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-leds-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org --KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > IBM created an implementation of the PCA9552 on a PIC16F > microcontroller. Document the new compatible string for this device. Is the implementation opensource? > Signed-off-by: Eddie James > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pca955x.txt > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ Required properties: > "nxp,pca9550" > "nxp,pca9551" > "nxp,pca9552" > + "nxp,pca9552-ibm" > "nxp,pca9553" Is it good idea to use nxp prefix for something that is software-defined and not built by nxp? Would ibm,pca9552 be better, or maybe even sw,pca9552 to indicate that is not real hardware, but software emulation? Best regards, Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAl8Jwx4ACgkQMOfwapXb+vIgMACgolyJryoAUGrvtZYcbrqprmGv rqgAn3oROytMSB/cAB9QLxtzJcFvZc3z =tTZV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP--