Hi! > > > But why you consider it as function enumerator? > > > For example card48, card56 are two different devices of same type. > > > Both have 'status' LED. > > > > OK this is a fair point. > > > > I was thinking such because in my mind I had this idea that for an ethernet > > switch with interfaces lan0 - lan4 it would make sense to use the > > LED_FUNCTION_LAN function with function enumerator. But thinking about > > this now again makes me wonder if instead the lan0 - lan4 should be > > devicenames instead, since normally they are network interface names. > > > > Vadim, the reason why Pavel and I think that mlxreg (or mlxregN) is not > > valid devicename part (although mlxreg has to stay since many users > > already depend on it, as you say), is that the mlxreg name is not exposed > > anywhere else in Linux from userspace point of view. > > > > Devicename eth0 is okay, because it is network interface name. > > Devicename sda would be okay, because everyone knows it is a block device > > and you can access it via /dev/sda. > > Devicename hci0 would be okay because it is bluetooth interface accessible > > via hcitool. > > Devicenames mtd0, kbd0, mouse0 would be okay, I think. > > > > But mlxreg is not accessible via anything else in the system. Unless your > > systems also have something like /dev/mlxreg, that is. > > > > Do the LEDs on these cards only indicate status of the cards themselves as a > > whole? Or are there LEDs on these cards dedicated to their peripherals? For > > example if there is an ethernet port with LEDs on one of these cards, the > > devicename part for these LEDs should be of the device of that ethernet > > port, not mlxreg... > > Hi Marek, > > Each line card must have 'status' LED, indicating status of line card itself. > User can set non-green in case some there are some alarms on different devices, > equipped on this line card. It can be set blink during line card initialization. > > Line card could be equipped with UID LED. User can set this LED in order to > find physical location of line card. Sometimes it's hard to see the sticker on > chassis. > > Line card also equipped with per port LED, but those LEDs are handled by FW. > > So, the device in this case is 'line card'. > > In my previous reply I suggest name 'fru' stands for the filed replaceable unit. > This is not something, that is exposed in '/dev', but it describes any replaceable > unit within the system. So.. you'd use the LED to locate right PCI card, or the LED would indicate that whole card is failing, etc...? Could we use pci00:1b.0 as the device name? (same as lspci). Probably replace : with _... Best regards, Pavel -- http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek