Hi!

> > Yes, this still persists. But we really do not want to start
> > introducing namespaces to the LED subsystem.
> 
> Did we come to any conclusion?
> 
> My preliminary r8169 implementation now creates the following LED names:
> 
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul 26 22:50 r8169-led0-0300 ->
> > ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.0/0000:03:00.0/net/enp3s0/r8169-led0-0300

So "r8159-0300:green:activity" would be closer to the naming we want,
but lets not do that, we really want this to be similar to what others
are doing, and that probably means "ethphy3:green:activity" AFAICT.

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek