From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87DB9C33CB7 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 16:42:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4005A2082E for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 16:42:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="KXG75xBs" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726837AbgAaQmd (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jan 2020 11:42:33 -0500 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]:35022 "EHLO lelv0143.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726193AbgAaQmd (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jan 2020 11:42:33 -0500 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 00VGgKxq064784; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 10:42:20 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1580488940; bh=qzzR6Id7uzDGRZnEt7ZRwhYlAQLF48xBx5ZTss8fi0w=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=KXG75xBsqGXmKD0twQbxrqdKKq2khemLj9jw6ySj3Oq7Xh24nM9AJokBvhEDHhMTR 4tePYgfwyfjVmRv9jVhQRE1/iIg3MykD9tIpb6r8r8dGkayWNufwozBzGeHXn4wCCA eDU4qFmgpjM50HGZjNKilGYAT6hhk/x9xF0bk2rE= Received: from DFLE114.ent.ti.com (dfle114.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.35]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 00VGgK1E069773; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 10:42:20 -0600 Received: from DFLE103.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.24) by DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 10:42:19 -0600 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DFLE103.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 10:42:19 -0600 Received: from [10.250.65.13] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 00VGgJTF016761; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 10:42:19 -0600 Subject: Re: How to synchronize leds in trigger To: Marek Behun , Oleh Kravchenko CC: Jacek Anaszewski , References: <69050f67-b611-dfd9-b166-a0d51edc18e2@kaa.org.ua> <54c07894-f302-fe1e-9f03-aa30ea1abca1@kaa.org.ua> <20200130104424.22cec119@nic.cz> From: Dan Murphy Message-ID: <4711aef2-d608-b0fe-f36a-80702753f10d@ti.com> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 10:39:01 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200130104424.22cec119@nic.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-leds-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org Marek On 1/30/20 3:44 AM, Marek Behun wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 09:57:08 +0200 > Oleh Kravchenko wrote: > >> I'm happy to invest my time to implement such functionality. >> I think it can be really useful for LEDs array like CR0014114 . >> >> In few days I can publish my vision, >> but before that could you please explain why it will took months? >> Where it can be hard to implement? >> > Just look at how long the API for RGB LEDs is being agreed upon. It is > over a year already, if not longer, and still not merged. Agreed. The patchset for RGB LEDs has been waiting since November for merge or even applied to led-next.  I rebased the patches and added the ACKs and resent.  Kinda hoped it would have made 5.6. Dan