Linux-LEDs Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
To: "linus.walleij@linaro.org" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "dmurphy@ti.com" <dmurphy@ti.com>,
	"linux-leds@vger.kernel.org" <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mturquette@baylibre.com" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	"lgirdwood@gmail.com" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	"jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com" <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>,
	"mazziesaccount@gmail.com" <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>,
	"a.zummo@towertech.it" <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"bgolaszewski@baylibre.com" <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	"linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	"pavel@ucw.cz" <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	"sboyd@kernel.org" <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"lee.jones@linaro.org" <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 12/13] gpio: bd71828: Initial support for ROHM BD71828 PMIC GPIOs
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 13:34:27 +0000
Message-ID: <588fccc0cafd01de7cb35b696a953f8a6e6937f6.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZ5CC4mtNYrurx_2M_3BN6Tu7rQ=d4-y-HOsDbRteKjjA@mail.gmail.com>

Hello Linus,

Thanks again for the review :) Highly appreciated!

On Thu, 2019-10-24 at 13:59 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 1:51 PM Matti Vaittinen
> <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com> wrote:
> 
> > ROHM BD71828 PMIC contains 4 pins which can be configured by OTP
> > to be used for general purposes. First 3 can be used as outputs
> > and 4.th pin can be used as input. Allow them to be controlled
> > via GPIO framework.
> > 
> > The driver assumes all of the pins are configured as GPIOs and
> > trusts that the reserved pins in other OTP configurations are
> > excluded from control using "gpio-reserved-ranges" device tree
> > property (or left untouched by GPIO users).
> > 
> > Typical use for 4.th pin (input) is to use it as HALL sensor
> > input so that this pin state is toggled when HALL sensor detects
> > LID position change (from close to open or open to close). PMIC
> > HW implements some extra logic which allows PMIC to power-up the
> > system when this pin is toggled. Please see the data sheet for
> > details of GPIO options which can be selcted by OTP settings.
> 
> spelling of selected

Right, thanks.

> > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
> 
> Overall looks very good.
> 
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> 
> I think they want you to use GPL-2.0-only these days.

Hmm. Is this documented somewhere? The LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0
still states:
Valid-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
Valid-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
Valid-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
Valid-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
SPDX-URL: https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0.html
Usage-Guide:
  To use this license in source code, put one of the following SPDX
  tag/value pairs into a comment according to the placement
  guidelines in the licensing rules documentation.
  For 'GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2 only' use:
    SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
  or
    SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
  For 'GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2 or any later version'
use:
    SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
  or
    SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later

(at least for 5.4-rc2)

This looks like "GPL-2.0" should still be valid. Not that I have
anything against the "GPL-2.0-only" - I am just a tiny bit frustrated
what comes to polishing the SPDX format :/

> > +#define BD71828_OUT 0
> > +#define BD71828_IN 1
> 
> These have nothing to do with BD71828, just skip these defines
> and hardcode 0/1 in the code called from gpiolib.

I personally don't like using 0/1 as I _always_ need to check which is
IN and which is OUT. It must be somehow related to my brain chemistry
but this just does not stay in my mind over a weekend... But you are
right - having these defines in bd71828 driver does not help much. When
I start with next GPIO chip I must once again dig the values from these
defines or from somewhere else. Thus...

>  If we want defines
> for this they should be generically named and put in
> <linux/gpio/driver.h>

...placing the defines in this header which is visible also in next
driver would be "the right thing to do"(tm).

Do you think we should add the defines there then? I was not trying to
do that as I thought that someone really loves the raw numbers and
dislikes defines - as these hard-coded values 1 and 0 seem to be used
everywhere... :] Maybe the plain numbers are only difficult for me?

> Nice use of the config API!

Thanks =) I admit I have stolen that from some other driver. So I don't
really deserve the credits =) It's easy to build when the foundations
are done well ;)

Br,
	Matti Vaittinen

  reply index

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-24 11:40 [RFC PATCH v2 00/13] Support ROHM BD71828 PMIC Matti Vaittinen
2019-10-24 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/13] mfd: bd71828: Support ROHM BD71828 PMIC - core Matti Vaittinen
2019-10-24 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/13] dt-bindings: mfd: Document ROHM BD71828 bindings Matti Vaittinen
2019-10-24 19:35   ` Dan Murphy
2019-10-25  5:49     ` Vaittinen, Matti
2019-10-29 12:08       ` Lee Jones
2019-10-29 19:34       ` Rob Herring
2019-10-30  8:26         ` Vaittinen, Matti
2019-10-30 19:22           ` Rob Herring
2019-10-31 12:54             ` Vaittinen, Matti
2019-10-31 17:50               ` Rob Herring
2019-11-01 12:52                 ` Vaittinen, Matti
2019-11-04 19:28                   ` Rob Herring
2019-10-24 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/13] dt-bindings: regulator: Document ROHM BD71282 regulator bindings Matti Vaittinen
2019-10-24 11:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/13] mfd: input: bd71828: Add power-key support Matti Vaittinen
2019-10-24 11:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/13] clk: bd718x7: Support ROHM BD71828 clk block Matti Vaittinen
2019-10-28 23:32   ` Stephen Boyd
2019-10-29  6:28     ` Vaittinen, Matti
     [not found]       ` <20191105005541.7913220717@mail.kernel.org>
2019-11-05  8:11         ` Vaittinen, Matti
2019-10-24 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/13] regulator: bd718x7: Split driver to common and bd718x7 specific parts Matti Vaittinen
2019-10-24 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/13] regulator: bd71828: Basic support for ROHM bd71828 PMIC regulators Matti Vaittinen
2019-10-24 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/13] regulator: bd71828: Add GPIO based run-level control for regulators Matti Vaittinen
2019-10-24 11:47 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/13] regulator: bd71828: enhanced run-level support Matti Vaittinen
2019-10-24 11:47 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/13] regulator: bd71828: Support in-kernel APIs to change run-level Matti Vaittinen
2019-10-24 11:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/13] rtc: bd70528 add BD71828 support Matti Vaittinen
2019-10-24 11:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/13] gpio: bd71828: Initial support for ROHM BD71828 PMIC GPIOs Matti Vaittinen
2019-10-24 11:59   ` Linus Walleij
2019-10-24 13:34     ` Vaittinen, Matti [this message]
2019-10-24 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/13] led: bd71828: Support LED outputs on ROHM BD71828 PMIC Matti Vaittinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=588fccc0cafd01de7cb35b696a953f8a6e6937f6.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com \
    --to=matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmurphy@ti.com \
    --cc=jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-LEDs Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/0 linux-leds/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-leds linux-leds/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds \
		linux-leds@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-leds

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-leds


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git