From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96D44C0650F for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:40:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C352206A2 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:40:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="hCM1ozrM" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730167AbfG3Skb (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 14:40:31 -0400 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.249]:40652 "EHLO lelv0142.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727599AbfG3Ska (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 14:40:30 -0400 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x6UIeQX7125454; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:40:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1564512026; bh=eGM+rs0hw6Wk2bnhRDKqKyJtphA0ZHwBzB5fx++9ViU=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=hCM1ozrMs9ikzKI+b9IVe0DbCJv0u7Wt7reEPxiY8xkhBBjY3jiaN8m3s2R+Rxx9q SQYoL30zuN6Sv5PVlPEu3kyGbn4BOy1xPyf48dqLX6Rd7JX2iwfRZ9TVVWX7myaTwg xO6lyyOSxZHsskt9uPuH0vaLVvvfMO/w1W7RwV9c= Received: from DLEE110.ent.ti.com (dlee110.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.21]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x6UIeQ2D019200 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:40:26 -0500 Received: from DLEE115.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.26) by DLEE110.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:40:25 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DLEE115.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:40:25 -0500 Received: from [10.250.65.13] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x6UIeP7h027907; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:40:25 -0500 To: Jacek Anaszewski , "linux-leds@vger.kernel.org" , Pavel Machek From: Dan Murphy Subject: LEDs next branch Message-ID: <99b075d0-e230-35bc-06c5-712a69fab91d@ti.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:40:25 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-leds-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org Jacek Did you see/fix this on the led-next branch? I saw this when booting trying to fix the lm3532 [    8.651461] led_class: exports duplicate symbol devm_led_classdev_register_ext (owned by kernel) [    8.730063] led_class: exports duplicate symbol devm_led_classdev_register_ext (owned by kernel) Dan