From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM-runtime: allow userspace to monitor runtime_status changes
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 22:13:16 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAC5umyhBkvWFaRpzJ=xtdnf_fLHe2OeJJ01sve8F6HA0=MuLMQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0g+NqasLwWRLA_LM+QEjrHquxzEgtvG4_P=4n=vzpOHWQ@mail.gmail.com>
2019年9月3日(火) 6:47 Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>:
>
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 4:09 PM Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > This enables the /sys/devices/.../power/runtime_status attribute to
> > allow the user space to get notifications via poll/select when the device
> > runtime PM status is changed.
> >
> > An example use case is to avoid unnecessary accesses for device statistics
> > (e.g. diskstats for block devices) while the device is in runtime suspend
> > by user space LED device actitity trigger.
> >
> > Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> > Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-power | 2 ++
> > drivers/base/power/power.h | 1 +
> > drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 1 +
> > drivers/base/power/sysfs.c | 5 +++++
> > 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-power b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-power
> > index 3e50536..47dc357 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-power
> > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-power
> > @@ -269,3 +269,5 @@ Description:
> > the current runtime PM status of the device, which may be
> > "suspended", "suspending", "resuming", "active", "error" (fatal
> > error), or "unsupported" (runtime PM is disabled).
> > + This attribute allows the user space to get notifications via
> > + poll/select when the device runtime PM status is changed.
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/power.h b/drivers/base/power/power.h
> > index ec33fbdb..8891bf4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/power/power.h
> > +++ b/drivers/base/power/power.h
> > @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ extern int pm_qos_sysfs_add_flags(struct device *dev);
> > extern void pm_qos_sysfs_remove_flags(struct device *dev);
> > extern int pm_qos_sysfs_add_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev);
> > extern void pm_qos_sysfs_remove_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev);
> > +extern void sysfs_notify_runtime_status(struct device *dev);
> >
> > #else /* CONFIG_PM */
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > index b753355..3a3e413 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ static void __update_runtime_status(struct device *dev, enum rpm_status status)
> > {
> > update_pm_runtime_accounting(dev);
> > dev->power.runtime_status = status;
> > + sysfs_notify_runtime_status(dev);
>
> There are concerns about this.
>
> First off, it adds overhead for devices that change the PM-runtime
> status relatively often. I'm not sure if that's sufficiently
> justified.
>
> Second, it is called for status changes from "active" to "suspending"
> and from "suspending" to "suspended" (and analogously for resume)
> which may not be particularly useful. At least, user space may not
> have enough time to act on such notifications.
>
> Finally, it is racy, because at the time user space does something on
> a device PM-runtime status change, it very well may have changed the
> other way around already.
I withdraw this patch now. I hope I'll retry with a real use case example
program.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-03 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-01 14:08 [PATCH 1/2] PM-runtime: Documentation: add runtime_status ABI document Akinobu Mita
2019-09-01 14:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] PM-runtime: allow userspace to monitor runtime_status changes Akinobu Mita
2019-09-02 21:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-09-03 13:13 ` Akinobu Mita [this message]
2019-09-03 14:31 ` Alan Stern
2019-09-01 14:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] PM-runtime: Documentation: add runtime_status ABI document Dominik Brodowski
2019-09-02 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAC5umyhBkvWFaRpzJ=xtdnf_fLHe2OeJJ01sve8F6HA0=MuLMQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).