From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
Srikanth Krishnakar <skrishnakar@gmail.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Gerd Haeussler <gerd.haeussler.ext@siemens.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] leds: simatic-ipc-leds: add new driver for Siemens Industial PCs
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:48:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcBdR8xqfWqKe+DwGAUYByVL7SBK0p7tHcKPs7m4Ay1iw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210315095710.7140-3-henning.schild@siemens.com>
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 11:57 AM Henning Schild
<henning.schild@siemens.com> wrote:
>
> This driver adds initial support for several devices from Siemens. It is
> based on a platform driver introduced in an earlier commit.
...
> +struct simatic_ipc_led {
> + unsigned int value; /* mask for io and offset for mem */
> + char name[32];
Hmm... Dunno if LED framework defines its own constraints for the
length of the name.
> + struct led_classdev cdev;
> +};
> +
> +static struct simatic_ipc_led simatic_ipc_leds_io[] = {
> + {1 << 15, "simatic-ipc:green:" LED_FUNCTION_STATUS "-1" },
> + {1 << 7, "simatic-ipc:yellow:" LED_FUNCTION_STATUS "-1" },
> + {1 << 14, "simatic-ipc:red:" LED_FUNCTION_STATUS "-2" },
> + {1 << 6, "simatic-ipc:yellow:" LED_FUNCTION_STATUS "-2" },
> + {1 << 13, "simatic-ipc:red:" LED_FUNCTION_STATUS "-3" },
> + {1 << 5, "simatic-ipc:yellow:" LED_FUNCTION_STATUS "-3" },
Can you use BIT() macro here? And can it be sorted by the bit order?
> + {0, ""},
{ } is enough (no comma for terminator lines in general, and no need
to show structure member assignments separately in particular).
> +};
> +
> +/* the actual start will be discovered with pci, 0 is a placeholder */
PCI
> +struct resource simatic_ipc_led_mem_res =
> + DEFINE_RES_MEM_NAMED(0, SZ_4K, KBUILD_MODNAME);
One line?
...
> +static struct simatic_ipc_led simatic_ipc_leds_mem[] = {
> + {0x500 + 0x1A0, "simatic-ipc:red:" LED_FUNCTION_STATUS "-1"},
> + {0x500 + 0x1A8, "simatic-ipc:green:" LED_FUNCTION_STATUS "-1"},
> + {0x500 + 0x1C8, "simatic-ipc:red:" LED_FUNCTION_STATUS "-2"},
> + {0x500 + 0x1D0, "simatic-ipc:green:" LED_FUNCTION_STATUS "-2"},
> + {0x500 + 0x1E0, "simatic-ipc:red:" LED_FUNCTION_STATUS "-3"},
> + {0x500 + 0x198, "simatic-ipc:green:" LED_FUNCTION_STATUS "-3"},
> + {0, ""},
As per above.
> +};
...
> + struct simatic_ipc_led *led =
> + container_of(led_cd, struct simatic_ipc_led, cdev);
One line?
...
> + struct simatic_ipc_led *led =
> + container_of(led_cd, struct simatic_ipc_led, cdev);
One line?
...
> + struct simatic_ipc_led *led =
> + container_of(led_cd, struct simatic_ipc_led, cdev);
Ditto.
Btw, usually for such cases we create an inline helper
... to_simatic_ipc_led(...)
{
return container_of(...);
}
...
> +static int simatic_ipc_leds_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct simatic_ipc_platform *plat;
const?
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct simatic_ipc_led *ipcled;
> + struct led_classdev *cdev;
> + struct resource *res;
> + int err, type;
> + u32 *p;
> + plat = pdev->dev.platform_data;
Can be done directly in the definition block.
> + switch (plat->devmode) {
> + case SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_227D:
> + case SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_427E:
> + res = &simatic_ipc_led_io_res;
> + ipcled = simatic_ipc_leds_io;
> + /* the 227D is high on while 427E is low on, invert the struct
> + * we have
> + */
> + if (plat->devmode == SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_227D) {
> + while (ipcled->value) {
> + ipcled->value = swab16(ipcled->value);
> + ipcled++;
> + }
This seems fishy. If you have a BE CPU it won't work the same way.
Better:
a) to use cpu_to_le16 / be16
b) create this as a helper that we may move to the generic header of byteorder.
But looking at the use of it, perhaps you rather need to redefine IO
accessors, i.e. ioread16()/iowrite16() vs. ioread16be()/iowrite16be().
> + ipcled = simatic_ipc_leds_io;
> + }
> + type = IORESOURCE_IO;
> + if (!devm_request_region(dev, res->start,
> + resource_size(res),
> + KBUILD_MODNAME)) {
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "Unable to register IO resource at %pR\n",
> + res);
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> + break;
> + case SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_127E:
> + res = &simatic_ipc_led_mem_res;
> + ipcled = simatic_ipc_leds_mem;
> + type = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> +
> + /* get GPIO base from PCI */
> + res->start = simatic_ipc_get_membase0(PCI_DEVFN(13, 0));
> + if (res->start == 0)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + /* do the final address calculation */
> + res->start = res->start + (0xC5 << 16);
Magic. As I told you this is an actual offseet in the P2SB's bar for
GPIO registers.
I have a question, why we can't provide a GPIO driver which is already
in the kernel and, with use of the patch series I sent, to convert
this all magic to GPIO LEDs as it's done for all normal cases?
> + res->end += res->start;
> +
> + simatic_ipc_led_memory = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> + if (IS_ERR(simatic_ipc_led_memory))
> + return PTR_ERR(simatic_ipc_led_memory);
> +
> + /* initialize power/watchdog LED */
> + p = simatic_ipc_led_memory + 0x500 + 0x1D8; /* PM_WDT_OUT */
> + *p = (*p & ~1);
> + p = simatic_ipc_led_memory + 0x500 + 0x1C0; /* PM_BIOS_BOOT_N */
> + *p = (*p | 1);
> +
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-15 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-15 9:57 [PATCH v2 0/4] add device drivers for Siemens Industrial PCs Henning Schild
2021-03-15 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] platform/x86: simatic-ipc: add main driver for Siemens devices Henning Schild
2021-03-15 10:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-15 16:30 ` Henning Schild
2021-03-17 19:13 ` Henning Schild
2021-03-17 20:03 ` Hans de Goede
2021-03-18 11:30 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2021-03-18 11:45 ` Hans de Goede
2021-03-26 9:55 ` Henning Schild
2021-03-26 12:21 ` Hans de Goede
2021-03-15 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] leds: simatic-ipc-leds: add new driver for Siemens Industial PCs Henning Schild
2021-03-15 10:48 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2021-03-15 11:19 ` Pavel Machek
2021-03-15 11:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-15 12:40 ` Henning Schild
2021-03-18 11:38 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2021-03-27 9:46 ` Henning Schild
2021-04-01 16:20 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2021-03-27 9:56 ` Henning Schild
2021-03-18 10:27 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2021-03-18 12:40 ` Alexander Dahl
2021-03-23 17:45 ` Henning Schild
2021-03-26 16:33 ` Henning Schild
2021-03-18 10:25 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2021-03-27 11:16 ` Henning Schild
2021-03-27 11:41 ` Henning Schild
2021-03-15 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] watchdog: simatic-ipc-wdt: add new driver for Siemens Industrial PCs Henning Schild
2021-03-15 15:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-29 16:28 ` Henning Schild
2021-03-15 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] platform/x86: pmc_atom: improve critclk_systems matching for Siemens PCs Henning Schild
2021-03-15 10:14 ` Henning Schild
2021-03-15 10:19 ` Hans de Goede
2021-03-15 12:09 ` Henning Schild
2021-03-15 14:58 ` [PATCH] platform/x86: pmc_atom: use callback for all dmi quirk entries Henning Schild
2021-03-15 16:31 ` Hans de Goede
2021-03-15 17:00 ` Henning Schild
2021-03-15 18:01 ` Hans de Goede
2021-03-16 5:47 ` Henning Schild
2021-03-16 9:43 ` Hans de Goede
2021-03-15 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] platform/x86: pmc_atom: improve critclk_systems matching for Siemens PCs kernel test robot
2021-03-15 10:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] add device drivers for Siemens Industrial PCs Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-15 16:08 ` Henning Schild
2021-08-02 9:21 ` Henning Schild
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHp75VcBdR8xqfWqKe+DwGAUYByVL7SBK0p7tHcKPs7m4Ay1iw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=gerd.haeussler.ext@siemens.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=henning.schild@siemens.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skrishnakar@gmail.com \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).