From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A90C433E1 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 12:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90288206E6 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 12:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="xHayLRE3" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728953AbgGFMcT (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2020 08:32:19 -0400 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:60996 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728414AbgGFMcT (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2020 08:32:19 -0400 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 066CW0dl027058; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 07:32:00 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1594038720; bh=zFAm7cgzQI8dO5tnF4ApS2fDkJ0/QyQP2WUW5IlgemM=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=xHayLRE3JMhI6U+jg58sUNv8RgyFElvL2pBV4IFewVr3n+hWPqBRQl0lyXumc9bbY QoNCC8EQmJEYEUtB4csoqZuLFB76uEc1iYAzBYWFb4kCpzR9XKH22M9yjgFxeoJ9kA 2uXBRL9ro9kfulWHnwkgCg1IWlp2kKJgz6Gz6OHo= Received: from DFLE110.ent.ti.com (dfle110.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.31]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 066CW0S9066434 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 6 Jul 2020 07:32:00 -0500 Received: from DFLE115.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.36) by DFLE110.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 07:32:00 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE115.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 07:31:59 -0500 Received: from [10.250.32.229] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 066CVx60070054; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 07:31:59 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v29 00/16] Multicolor Framework v29 To: Pavel Machek , CC: , , , , , References: <20200622185919.2131-1-dmurphy@ti.com> <20200704124729.GA20088@amd> From: Dan Murphy Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 07:31:59 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200704124729.GA20088@amd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-leds-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org Pavel On 7/4/20 7:47 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >> This is the multi color LED framework. This framework presents clustered >> colored LEDs into an array and allows the user space to adjust the brightness >> of the cluster using a single file write. The individual colored LEDs >> intensities are controlled via a single file that is an array of LEDs >> >> Change to the LEDs Kconfig to fix dependencies on the LP55XX_COMMON. >> Added update to the u8500_defconfig > Marek, would you be willing to look over this series? > > Dan, can we please get it in the order > > 1) fixes first > > 2) changes needed for multicolor but not depending on dt acks > > 3) dt changes > > 4) rest? > > This is the order it should have been in the first place, and I'd like > to get fixes applied, and perhaps some of the preparation. This will depend on if there are comments.  If I have to push a v30 then I will reorder. If not then there would be no reason to re-order these. Dan