From: Tracy R Reed <treed@ultraviolet.org>
To: Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>
Cc: "Ragnar Kjørstad" <lvm@ragnark.vestdata.no>, linux-lvm@msede.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM viewer / manager APP
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 06:29:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000413062934.B29741@ultraviolet.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0004122343370.4400-100000@fogarty.spin.ie>; from paul@clubi.ie on Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 11:46:56PM +0100
On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 11:46:56PM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote:
> Please please look very carefully at those screenshots. Then make
> sure yours looks nothing like it. The Veritas GUI (as i've
> experienced it in Unixware 7) is the worst POS ever.
I must agree. I was upgrading our Solaris mail server last night and spent
hours and hours (until 4am) screwing with the Veritas VMSA GUI. And this is
the almost latest version Java GUI. Eventually I gave up because it was slow,
non-intuitive, and merely system()'s off comand-line commands anyhow. I
started learning the command line stuff and now I am much better off for it.
However, I must admit that Veritas tech support is darn good. They always
answer my somewhat complicated questions quite well and were very responsive.
But for the amount we pay as a big corporate customer, they darn well better!
Now I get especially irritated when I get crummy bonehead support at home as
an ordinary user.
Hopefully one of these GUI apps can one day be used in a distributions GUI
install process and we can have nice LVM disk management from day 1. It
appears that there are two GUI's being worked on, is that correct? Is it
necessary?
--
Tracy Reed http://www.ultraviolet.org
echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq'|dc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-04-13 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-04-12 18:56 [linux-lvm] LVM viewer / manager APP Ragnar Kjørstad
2000-04-12 20:18 ` bert hubert
2000-04-12 22:46 ` Paul Jakma
2000-04-12 23:46 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2000-04-13 13:29 ` Tracy R Reed [this message]
2000-04-13 23:16 ` bert hubert
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-04-13 15:51 Shawn Ferris
2000-04-12 21:47 Michael Marxmeier
2000-04-05 7:19 [linux-lvm] LVM Viewer / Manager app Michael Marxmeier
2000-04-04 20:50 bert hubert
2000-04-05 6:51 ` Jos Visser
2000-04-05 18:50 ` bert hubert
2000-04-08 22:52 ` Terje Kvernes
2000-04-08 23:30 ` bert hubert
2000-04-09 12:50 ` Terje Kvernes
2000-04-09 12:07 ` Jos Visser
2000-04-09 21:38 ` Peter C. Norton
2000-04-09 22:58 ` bert hubert
2000-04-13 4:03 ` Christopher Briggs
2000-04-13 20:58 ` Paul Jakma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20000413062934.B29741@ultraviolet.org \
--to=treed@ultraviolet.org \
--cc=linux-lvm@msede.com \
--cc=lvm@ragnark.vestdata.no \
--cc=paul@clubi.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).