From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:57:16 -0700 From: Charles Duffy Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvdisplay disagrees with df for resized LV Message-ID: <20001011105716.A1483@mvista.com> References: <20001011084555.A6983@omnifarious.mn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from andy@redeye.com on Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 05:28:22PM +0100 Sender: owner-linux-lvm Errors-To: owner-linux-lvm List-Id: To: linux-lvm@msede.com --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 05:28:22PM +0100, Andy Cowling wrote: > Thanks to all for your help. I'm using reiserfs and on SuSE 7.0, the > resize utility was hidden away in /sbin/resize_reiserfs. >=20 > I have resized the file system to 90G successfully but, there always a > but isn't there :-), df now reports a total of 88Gb. >=20 > Out of interest is this due to rounding or reisfer/LVM housekeeping ? FYI, reiserfs can also be resized online (at least, the current 2.4-beta versions) w/ a command like the following: mount -o remount,resize=3D[NEWSIZE] filesystem I can't speak authoritatively about the missing 2G, but you can compare the LVM's allocated size (use vgdisplay to see how many PEs are allocated and what their size is) to the size of the filesystem reported by debugreiserfs. Also note that some earlier versions of reiserfs had some issues which resulted in inaccurate results from du; however, I don't know of any issues offhand which affected df's results. --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE55Kn8r/O29KUQmJURApVHAKCQ7NS6xiY772FxtWwevf0ixGTVQgCgjV7r Kqshx3egKXUdyVC6B+k3F4k= =voNK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu--