linux-lvm.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
Cc: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>, linux-lvm@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] "Data alignment must not exceed device size."
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:34:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180410153456.GA16779@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <620b7fac-9b9a-bdc9-6f5b-c3330fb6d429@redhat.com>

On Tue, Apr 10 2018 at 10:43am -0400,
Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com> wrote:

> Dne 10.4.2018 v 16:00 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
> >On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 09:47:30AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>Recently in Fedora something changed that stops us from creating small
> >>LVs for testing.
> >>
> >>An example failure with a 64 MB partitioned disk:
> >>
> >># parted -s -- /dev/sda mklabel msdos mkpart primary 128s -128s
> >>Warning: The resulting partition is not properly aligned for best performance: 128s % 65535s != 0s
> >># lvm pvcreate --force /dev/sda1
> >>   /dev/sda1: Data alignment must not exceed device size.
> >>   Format-specific initialisation of physical volume /dev/sda1 failed.
> >>   Failed to setup physical volume "/dev/sda1".
> >
> >Interestingly the alignment properties of the virtio-scsi virtual disk
> >has changed.  On the working system:
> >
> >==> /sys/block/sda/queue/minimum_io_size <==
> >512
> >
> >==> /sys/block/sda/queue/optimal_io_size <==
> >0
> >
> >On the new / broken system:
> >
> >==> /sys/block/sda/queue/minimum_io_size <==
> >33553920
> >
> >==> /sys/block/sda/queue/optimal_io_size <==
> >0
> >
> >(all other settings were the same).  I suppose this accounts for it,
> >and it could therefore be a problem with qemu rather than LVM.
> >
> >Working: qemu-2.11.0-4.fc28.x86_64
> >Broken:  qemu-2.12.0-0.5.rc1.fc29.x86_64
> >
> >Alasdair Kergon asked me to run the lvm command with -vvvv and I've
> >attached those results.
> 
> 
> Hi
> 
> Could you please retest first with official final release of 4.16 kernel.
> 
> There were some 'min()/max()' macro problems - maybe your rc4 build was affected.

Uptream's min_not_zero() issue was introduced after 4.16 was released
(as part of the 4.17 merge window).

So not related (as Richard already pointed out).

Mike

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-10 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-10  8:47 [linux-lvm] "Data alignment must not exceed device size." Richard W.M. Jones
2018-04-10 14:00 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2018-04-10 14:43   ` Zdenek Kabelac
2018-04-10 14:49     ` Richard W.M. Jones
2018-04-10 15:04       ` Zdenek Kabelac
2018-04-10 15:34     ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2018-04-10 15:01   ` Zdenek Kabelac
2018-04-10 15:05     ` Richard W.M. Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180410153456.GA16779@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=zkabelac@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).