From: Julian Andres Klode <email@example.com> To: Zdenek Kabelac <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cc: LVM general discussion and development <email@example.com> Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] [PATCH] Detect systemd at run-time in 69-dm-lvm-metad.rules Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:41:34 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190731104134.7jsaxfaywjoutm7o@jak-t480s> (raw) In-Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:22:38PM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > Dne 31. 07. 19 v 11:39 Julian Andres Klode napsal(a): > > > > I don't see how this has anything to do with lvmetad. There is no lvmetad > > > > anymore. > > > > > > The whole point of 'service' for 'pvscan' is to postone activation of DM > > > devices outside of udev rule processing. > > > > > > So whatever is replacing systemd service in your's systemd-less system must > > > provide similar functionality. > > > > > > There is currently no way to accept autoactivation capability within > > > udev-rule processing. > > > > This has nothing to do with the part of the message you are replying too, and > > is nonsense. The code to run pvscan directly is shipped, the change just moves > > the decision whether to do that from compile-time to run-time. > > As long as 'pvscan' is executed with 'auto-activation' option - it can't be > run from udev rule. Any proposal for this needs to first resolve, > how to ensure udev will not try to kill running command in the middle of work. > > Until this is resolved - proposal of this can't be accepted upstream. Again: The code is already there. I'm just moving the decision what to pick from compile-time to run-time. This is entirely orthogonal to whether the existing code works well or not. -- debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev ubuntu core developer i speak de, en
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-31 10:41 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-07-25 18:49 Julian Andres Klode 2019-07-30 15:02 ` Zdenek Kabelac 2019-07-30 15:12 ` Julian Andres Klode 2019-07-31 9:21 ` Zdenek Kabelac 2019-07-31 9:33 ` Julian Andres Klode 2019-07-31 10:16 ` Zdenek Kabelac 2019-07-31 10:51 ` Gionatan Danti 2019-07-31 11:12 ` Zdenek Kabelac 2019-07-31 9:39 ` Julian Andres Klode 2019-07-31 10:22 ` Zdenek Kabelac 2019-07-31 10:41 ` Julian Andres Klode [this message] 2019-07-31 11:09 ` Zdenek Kabelac
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20190731104134.7jsaxfaywjoutm7o@jak-t480s \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --subject='Re: [linux-lvm] [PATCH] Detect systemd at run-time in 69-dm-lvm-metad.rules' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).