linux-lvm.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julian Andres Klode <julian.klode@canonical.com>
To: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
Cc: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] [PATCH] Detect systemd at run-time in 69-dm-lvm-metad.rules
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:41:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190731104134.7jsaxfaywjoutm7o@jak-t480s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37de8264-a02e-a1b9-e297-c64ac35833fb@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:22:38PM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> Dne 31. 07. 19 v 11:39 Julian Andres Klode napsal(a):
> > > > I don't see how this has anything to do with lvmetad. There is no lvmetad
> > > > anymore.
> > > 
> > > The whole point of 'service' for 'pvscan' is to postone activation of DM
> > > devices outside of udev rule processing.
> > > 
> > > So whatever is replacing systemd service in your's systemd-less system must
> > > provide similar functionality.
> > > 
> > > There is currently no way to accept autoactivation capability within
> > > udev-rule processing.
> > 
> > This has nothing to do with the part of the message you are replying too, and
> > is nonsense. The code to run pvscan directly is shipped, the change just moves
> > the decision whether to do that from compile-time to run-time.
> 
> As long as 'pvscan' is executed with 'auto-activation' option - it can't be
> run from udev rule.   Any proposal for this needs to first resolve,
> how to ensure udev will not try to kill running command in the middle of work.
> 
> Until this is resolved - proposal of this can't be accepted upstream.

Again: The code is already there. I'm just moving the decision what to pick from
compile-time to run-time. This is entirely orthogonal to whether the existing code
works well or not.

-- 
debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev
ubuntu core developer                              i speak de, en

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-31 10:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-25 18:49 Julian Andres Klode
2019-07-30 15:02 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2019-07-30 15:12   ` Julian Andres Klode
2019-07-31  9:21     ` Zdenek Kabelac
2019-07-31  9:33       ` Julian Andres Klode
2019-07-31 10:16         ` Zdenek Kabelac
2019-07-31 10:51           ` Gionatan Danti
2019-07-31 11:12             ` Zdenek Kabelac
2019-07-31  9:39       ` Julian Andres Klode
2019-07-31 10:22         ` Zdenek Kabelac
2019-07-31 10:41           ` Julian Andres Klode [this message]
2019-07-31 11:09             ` Zdenek Kabelac

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190731104134.7jsaxfaywjoutm7o@jak-t480s \
    --to=julian.klode@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
    --cc=zkabelac@redhat.com \
    --subject='Re: [linux-lvm] [PATCH] Detect systemd at run-time in 69-dm-lvm-metad.rules' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).