From: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
To: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
Cc: Gang He <GHe@suse.com>, linux-lvm@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] pvresize will cause a meta-data corruption with error message "Error writing device at 4096 length 512"
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 10:14:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191011151405.GA31912@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6b055125-2e06-df7d-89fa-6c347404a9cd@suse.com>
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 08:11:29AM +0000, Heming Zhao wrote:
> I analyze this issue for some days. It looks a new bug.
Yes, thanks for the thorough analysis.
> In user machine, this write action was failed, the PV header data (first
> 4K) save in bcache (cache->errored list), and then write (by
> bcache_flush) to another disk (f748).
It looks like we need to get rid of cache->errored completely.
> If dev_write_bytes failed, the bcache never clean last_byte. and the fd
> is closed at same time, but cache->errored still have errored fd's data.
> later lvm open new disk, the fd may reuse the old-errored fd number,
> error data will be written when later lvm call bcache_flush.
That's a bad bug.
> 2> duplicated pv header.
> as <1> description, fc68 metadata was overwritten to f748.
> this cause by lvm bug (I said in <1>).
>
> 3> device not correct
> I don't know why the disk scsi-360060e80072a670000302a670000fc68 has below wrong metadata:
>
> pre_pvr/scsi-360060e80072a670000302a670000fc68
> (please also read the comments in below metadata area.)
> ```
> vgpocdbcdb1_r2 {
> id = "PWd17E-xxx-oANHbq"
> seqno = 20
> format = "lvm2"
> status = ["RESIZEABLE", "READ", "WRITE"]
> flags = []
> extent_size = 65536
> max_lv = 0
> max_pv = 0
> metadata_copies = 0
>
> physical_volumes {
>
> pv0 {
> id = "3KTOW5-xxxx-8g0Rf2"
> device = "/dev/disk/by-id/scsi-360060e80072a660000302a660000f768"
> Wrong!! ^^^^^
> I don't know why there is f768, please ask customer
> status = ["ALLOCATABLE"]
> flags = []
> dev_size = 860160
> pe_start = 2048
> pe_count = 13
> }
> }
> ```
> fc68 => f768 the 'c' (b1100) change to '7' (b0111).
> maybe disk bit overturn, maybe lvm has bug. I don't know & have no idea.
Is scsi-360060e80072a660000302a660000f768 the correct device for
PVID 3KTOW5...? If so, then it's consistent. If not, then I suspect
this is a result of duplicating the PVID on multiple devices above.
> On 9/11/19 5:17 PM, Gang He wrote:
> > Hello List,
> >
> > Our user encountered a meta-data corruption problem, when run pvresize command after upgrading to LVM2 v2.02.180 from v2.02.120.
> >
> > The details are as below,
> > we have following environment:
> > - Storage: HP XP7 (SAN) - LUN's are presented to ESX via RDM
> > - VMWare ESXi 6.5
> > - SLES 12 SP 4 Guest
> >
> > Resize happened this way (is our standard way since years) - however - this is our first resize after upgrading SLES 12 SP3 to SLES 12 SP4 - until this upgrade, we
> > never had a problem like this:
> > - split continous access on storage box, resize lun on XP7
> > - recreate ca on XP7
> > - scan on ESX
> > - rescan-scsi-bus.sh -s on SLES VM
> > - pvresize ( at this step the error happened)
> >
> > huns1vdb01:~ # pvresize /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-360060e80072a660000302a6600003274
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-11 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-11 9:17 [linux-lvm] pvresize will cause a meta-data corruption with error message "Error writing device at 4096 length 512" Gang He
2019-09-11 10:01 ` Ilia Zykov
2019-09-11 10:03 ` Ilia Zykov
2019-09-11 10:10 ` Ingo Franzki
2019-09-11 10:20 ` Gang He
2019-10-11 8:11 ` Heming Zhao
2019-10-11 9:22 ` Heming Zhao
2019-10-11 10:38 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2019-10-11 11:50 ` Heming Zhao
2019-10-11 15:14 ` David Teigland [this message]
2019-10-12 3:23 ` Gang He
2019-10-12 6:34 ` Heming Zhao
2019-10-12 7:11 ` Heming Zhao
2019-10-14 3:07 ` Heming Zhao
2019-10-14 3:13 ` Heming Zhao
2019-10-16 8:50 ` Heming Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191011151405.GA31912@redhat.com \
--to=teigland@redhat.com \
--cc=GHe@suse.com \
--cc=heming.zhao@suse.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).