From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D306560471 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 21:49:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.signet.nl (smtp2.signet.nl [83.96.147.103]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2402624D4 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 21:49:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.dds.nl (app1.dds.nl [81.21.136.61]) by smtp2.signet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A9A40F3823 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 23:49:57 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 23:49:57 +0200 From: Xen In-Reply-To: <5dd89d176b5a90c73920c91c3ba466c7@xenhideout.nl> References: <1438f48b-0a6d-4fb7-92dc-3688251e0a00@assyoma.it> <58E7992A.4030000@tlinx.org> <062fccc39afe128ef5950634309a01ea@assyoma.it> <783965ccb392bea2faded10436cdaf39@xenhideout.nl> <0658b33a7d4e5494de71231b7343a514@assyoma.it> <88a2badd9b77546407bba31778c00699@xenhideout.nl> <341979ccda1b2ee7cb5242006f1b03c8@assyoma.it> <5dd89d176b5a90c73920c91c3ba466c7@xenhideout.nl> Message-ID: <263a25cc77f0ef09d3d4f9ecb4b7e522@xenhideout.nl> Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Snapshot behavior on classic LVM vs ThinLVM Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Xen schreef op 15-04-2017 23:22: > I actually think it is enough if 225 extents get written. The snapshot > is 924 MB or 250-25 extents. Erm, that's 256 - 25 = 231. My math is good today :p.