From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast06.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.22]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E1C92166B44 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 16:52:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 043961823606 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 16:52:40 +0000 (UTC) From: lejeczek Message-ID: <269f632e-591e-56c3-a3be-31ac6060f73f@yahoo.co.uk> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2020 17:52:32 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <269f632e-591e-56c3-a3be-31ac6060f73f.ref@yahoo.co.uk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Subject: [linux-lvm] raid0 - no performance increase?? Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" To: LVM general discussion and development Hi guys, I have a simple raid0 lvm comprising of two NVME devices. I'd expect performance of such a volume to be higher than a "regular" volume ran of a single NVME, but simple dbench shows such raid0 volume to the same "slow" as a single NVME volume. The system is a Centos 8 with 5.8.14-1.el8.elrepo.x86_64 and default kernels. raid0:   #Str #DStr Stripe Type   Devices                         2     2 64.00k raid0  0_rimage_0(0),0_rimage_1(0)      1     1     0  linear /dev/nvme0n1(0)                 1     1     0  linear /dev/nvme1n1(0) Care to share your thoughts? I'll be grateful. many thanks, L