archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Ren <>
To: LVM general discussion and development <>,
	David Teigland <>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvmlockd: about the limitation on lvresizing the LV active on multiple nodes
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 10:42:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

Hi David,

On 01/04/2018 05:06 PM, Eric Ren wrote:
> David,
> On 01/03/2018 11:07 PM, David Teigland wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 11:52:34AM +0800, Eric Ren wrote:
>>>> 1. one one node: lvextend --lockopt skip -L+1G VG/LV
>>>>      That option doesn't exist, but illustrates the point that some 
>>>> new
>>>>      option could be used to skip the incompatible LV locking in 
>>>> lvmlockd.
>>> Hmm, is it safe to just skip the locking while the LV is active on 
>>> other
>>> node?
>>> Is there somewhere in the code to avoid concurrent lvm command to 
>>> execute
>>> at the same time?
>> The VG lock is still used to protect the VG metadata change. The LV lock
>> doesn't protect anything per se, it just represents that lvchange has
>> activated the LV on this host.  (The LV lock does not represent the
>> suspended/resumed state of the dm device either, as you suggested 
>> above.)
> I see, thanks for you explanation!
>> I'll send a simple patch to skip the lv lock to try this.
> I've tested your patch and it works very well.  Thanks very much.

Could you please consider to push this patch upstream? Also, Is this the 
same case
for pvmove as lvresize? If so, can we also work out a similar patch for 


  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-09  2:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-28 10:42 [linux-lvm] lvmlockd: about the limitation on lvresizing the LV active on multiple nodes Eric Ren
2018-01-02  8:09 ` Eric Ren
2018-01-02 17:10 ` David Teigland
2018-01-03  3:52   ` Eric Ren
2018-01-03 15:07     ` David Teigland
2018-01-04  9:06       ` Eric Ren
2018-01-09  2:42         ` Eric Ren [this message]
2018-01-09 15:42           ` David Teigland
2018-01-10  6:55             ` Eric Ren
2018-01-10 15:56               ` David Teigland
2018-01-11  9:32                 ` Eric Ren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).