From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx16.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com
	[10.5.110.45])
	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC8438400D
	for <linux-lvm@redhat.com>; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 02:14:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from prv1-mh.provo.novell.com (prv1-mh.provo.novell.com
	[137.65.248.33])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 501823082A32
	for <linux-lvm@redhat.com>; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 02:14:38 +0000 (UTC)
Message-Id: <5B21CF86020000F900022DEE@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 20:14:30 -0600
From: "Gang He" <ghe@suse.com>
References: <5B1F8BE7020000F90002293C@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com>
	<20180612142219.ixpzqxqws3qiwqbm@reti>
	<5B207DF9020000F900022B0E@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com>
	<20180613094303.53zhqymzojhr5dsx@reti>
In-Reply-To: <20180613094303.53zhqymzojhr5dsx@reti>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Some questions about the upcoming LVM v2_02_178
Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
List-Id: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/options/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-lvm>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: linux-lvm@redhat.com

Hello Joe,

Thank for your patient explaining, very useful.

-Gang

>>> On 2018/6/13 at 17:43, in message <20180613094303.53zhqymzojhr5dsx@reti>, Joe
Thornber <thornber@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 08:14:17PM -0600, Gang He wrote:
>> Hello Joe,
>> 
>> 
>> >>> On 2018/6/12 at 22:22, in message <20180612142219.ixpzqxqws3qiwqbm@reti>, Joe
>> Thornber <thornber@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 03:01:27AM -0600, Gang He wrote:
>> >> Hello List,
>> >> 
>> >> I saw there was a tag "v2_02_178-rc1" for LVM2, then I have some questions 
>> > about  the upcoming LVM v2_02_178.
>> >> 1) Will there be the version v2_02_178 for LVM2? since I saw some text 
> about 
>> > Version 3.0.0 in the git change logs.
>> > 
>> > Yes there will be.  We've had no bug reports for the -rc, so the final
>> > release will be the same as the -rc.
>> Between LVM2 v2_02_178-rc1 and  LVM2 v2_02_177, 
>> there will not be any components/features remove, except include some bug 
> fixes, right?
> 
> 
> 178 dropped support for two very old metadata formats (pool and lvm1), and 
> switched
> to async io all io ops apart from logging.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@redhat.com 
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm 
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/