From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0C5D5C54F for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 21:23:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.signet.nl (smtp2.signet.nl [83.96.147.103]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6604CC04B32C for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 21:23:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.dds.nl (app1.dds.nl [81.21.136.61]) by smtp2.signet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE79440F38BD for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 23:22:58 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 23:22:58 +0200 From: Xen In-Reply-To: <341979ccda1b2ee7cb5242006f1b03c8@assyoma.it> References: <1438f48b-0a6d-4fb7-92dc-3688251e0a00@assyoma.it> <58E7992A.4030000@tlinx.org> <062fccc39afe128ef5950634309a01ea@assyoma.it> <783965ccb392bea2faded10436cdaf39@xenhideout.nl> <0658b33a7d4e5494de71231b7343a514@assyoma.it> <88a2badd9b77546407bba31778c00699@xenhideout.nl> <341979ccda1b2ee7cb5242006f1b03c8@assyoma.it> Message-ID: <5dd89d176b5a90c73920c91c3ba466c7@xenhideout.nl> Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Snapshot behavior on classic LVM vs ThinLVM Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Gionatan Danti schreef op 14-04-2017 20:59: > Il 14-04-2017 19:36 Xen ha scritto: >> The thing is just dismounted apparently; I don't even know what causes >> it. >> > > Maybe running "iotop -a" for some hours can point you to the right > direction? I actually think it is enough if 225 extents get written. The snapshot is 924 MB or 250-25 extents. I think it only needs to write in 225 different places on the disk (225 different 4MB sectors) to fill the snapshot up. Cause there is no way in hell that an actual 924 MB would be written, because the entire system is not more than 5GB and the entire systemd journal is not more than maybe 28 MB :p.