From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gionatan Danti References: <597ba4e4-2028-ed62-6835-86ae9015ea5b@assyoma.it> <02958f63-ba2b-a6b5-1629-69581c1af316@assyoma.it> <5efcabfd-fad5-a228-8887-b9f4d38d2d1d@redhat.com> <0a45b797-70f3-6220-b7f5-525aacc40f0e@assyoma.it> Message-ID: <8540b6aa-ae0a-5195-c132-da8f485171dc@assyoma.it> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 13:06:19 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0a45b797-70f3-6220-b7f5-525aacc40f0e@assyoma.it> Content-Language: it-IT Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Higher than expected metadata usage? Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Zdenek Kabelac , LVM general discussion and development On 27/03/2018 12:58, Gionatan Danti wrote: > Mmm no, I am caring for the couple MBs themselves. I was concerned about > the possibility to get a full metadata device by writing far less data > than expected. But I now get the point. Sorry, I really meant "I am NOT caring for the couple MBs themselves" -- Danti Gionatan Supporto Tecnico Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it email: g.danti@assyoma.it - info@assyoma.it GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8