From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C10DFC433DB for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:12:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16F2722B2C for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:12:35 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 16F2722B2C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=linux-lvm-bounces@redhat.com Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-321-aWc5SwT3P2CdZjYFS876Pg-1; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 04:12:31 -0500 X-MC-Unique: aWc5SwT3P2CdZjYFS876Pg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9ED31005E42; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:12:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2848519813; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:12:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2796F1809C9F; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:12:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 10B4wBrp018841 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 23:58:11 -0500 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 3A9D344061; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 04:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast01.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.17]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33BDE440C4 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 04:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF70D858EEC for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 04:58:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf1-f53.google.com (mail-lf1-f53.google.com [209.85.167.53]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-279-9Idenv1YN0OfGh9dtDKEng-1; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 23:58:04 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 9Idenv1YN0OfGh9dtDKEng-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f53.google.com with SMTP id s26so35901756lfc.8; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 20:58:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=c4JOMVqEc4jHrzjUsNQyvr1s+bwuxEtfHWzDA+WHvRU=; b=bpbLiEqD3ixJa1gR5dt2wd/TrC53F85E+85bgQK4lNd1a8hu1qwQeyjCWk0dcZc2A4 C3RuKR9W6MACvAVyi7sqfIAh2pSXLii9Ds6roKVTxwFsRFx11BeOXEoOPix4T/Lo1+39 yaIr5sOlMz1i3ZrZk1QBscPBsnNnvnDI/SfexG228uyN4FkcCINiEnF0ih+ngJNlGLK1 bIUF0pXPFRP0Zq9ToLNJSn1Cnv7s6x24dCSmfxRCsGQCqNvzctAFFSFyDStO7DhVrsrR jdQPowU/iRREHZNwCPhc9ZLnW9de1FLRMOK7VauaBjWo9BVlFdj5GMdWeYSWu8hJK+Hb ehww== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Fadx10qoxl4LST9/EYtTEIkCvCmAy/jtvGGNXLNeVEPPxGRVa y17OpalrSltKgKW1G2firYxSuq8LWEIF/bFYESyeGZP+s1k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyyPN4Uj7izLPXJU3/FSKNOnnuBaadFc8tibR7CIvJEMXa/XZxe2ib+j0ZYFesTWjNeDnYa5HyEdc+y7Jd43cw= X-Received: by 2002:a19:5218:: with SMTP id m24mr100069lfb.232.1610341082406; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 20:58:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210105162233.GC26820@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20210105162233.GC26820@redhat.com> From: Songmin Li Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 12:57:52 +0800 Message-ID: To: David Teigland X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.11.54.5 X-loop: linux-lvm@redhat.com X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 04:12:05 -0500 Cc: linux-lvm@redhat.com Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] there is a vgextend sagfault with missing pv which is resolved on master, can we backport it to 2.02 branch X-BeenThere: linux-lvm@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-lvm-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=linux-lvm-bounces@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2006495368291588468==" --===============2006495368291588468== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002f213605b898c068" --0000000000002f213605b898c068 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Awesome, thanks! On Wed, Jan 6, 2021, 00:22 David Teigland wrote: > On Fri, Jan 01, 2021 at 05:49:49PM +0800, Songmin Li wrote: > > Can we backport this commit to 2.02 branch so we can repair lvm on disk > > fault? > > Hi, pushed that here > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=lvm2.git;a=commit;h=b98c3346350b7c270140c1f21fda0436876e16e8 > > Dave > > --0000000000002f213605b898c068 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Awesome, thanks!=C2=A0

On Wed, Jan 6, 2021, 00:22 David Te= igland <teigland@redhat.com&g= t; wrote:
On Fri, Jan 01, 2021 at 0= 5:49:49PM +0800, Songmin Li wrote:
> Can we backport this commit to 2.02 branch so we can repair lvm on dis= k
> fault?

Hi, pushed that here
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=3Dlvm2.git;a=3Dcommit;h=3Db98c3346350b= 7c270140c1f21fda0436876e16e8

Dave

--0000000000002f213605b898c068-- --===============2006495368291588468== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ --===============2006495368291588468==--