From: Paul Richards <paul.richards@gmail.com> To: dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-lvm@redhat.com Subject: [linux-lvm] lvmcache comes back dirty after unclean shutdown Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 09:26:23 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAMoswehmi-hhp2M0w_8nEwX5CwPKKR7YW9jw1QrNzE=PFqKcRw@mail.gmail.com> (raw) Hello, I would like to add a warning to the lvmcache man page about its suitability in environments that expect unclean shutdowns. I've been using lvmcache on my laptop which has a small nvme drive and a much larger hdd. I am using approx 60GiB of the nvme drive as a cache for the 1TiB HDD. With both "writethrough" and "writeback" modes an unclean shutdown results in the entire cache being marked as dirty. On next boot the system then spends a long time (4+ hours) writing the cache out to disk. From what I can see this is known behavior of lvmcache ([1] and [2]). It's even documented in the kernel device mapper docs [3]. It seems to me that dm-cache and lvmcache are not appropriate for environments that expect unclean shutdowns. In those environments I have found bcache to be a bit more robust. This is not a criticism of lvmcache and dm-cache. I am sure they perform well in more robust environments. But I wonder if it would be appropriate to add a warning note to the lvmcache man page about this issue? I am using Ubuntu 20.04 currently, if that's relevant, and I saw the same issue with 18.04. 1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2019-July/msg00114.html 2: https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2014-December/msg00143.html 3: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blame/79dede78c0573618e3137d3d8cbf78c84e25fabd/Documentation/admin-guide/device-mapper/cache.rst#L140-L143
reply other threads:[~2020-05-08 8:26 UTC|newest] Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to='CAMoswehmi-hhp2M0w_8nEwX5CwPKKR7YW9jw1QrNzE=PFqKcRw@mail.gmail.com' \ --to=paul.richards@gmail.com \ --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \ --subject='Re: [linux-lvm] lvmcache comes back dirty after unclean shutdown' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).