From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D70A4C4332F for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 07:31:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1665991882; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=5MvF9rS7eqQlDRfiNvysH5y4ISr3iUgqw89aNGOsYso=; b=f/IPVqN/SzQoAmMcyOMyUuyT1Tewl761bcO68LuRSMSdD1Ii2j/Da0esTaNi+il1ywxi56 P5cfA4XwLWDlQjWVQ0IOB7Snrn837Aw7HW3hOfnjZrzizFnqd+eRlIWfhCs/n+t8uwqm3v 6mjcZ0U1jslzpn4rLPdxXNKa8a8uZ6Q= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-556-zzm3_9K1O7ChdzJJmEARGw-1; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 03:31:19 -0400 X-MC-Unique: zzm3_9K1O7ChdzJJmEARGw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAC4F1021E04; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 07:31:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com [10.30.29.100]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657BD409AE9; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 07:31:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1231946A4B; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 07:31:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) by mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1887194658C for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 05:01:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id D0D4D409AEC; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 05:01:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast01.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.17]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8C7A409AE4 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 05:01:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4C5D857F8F for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 05:01:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from apac01-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eastasiaazon11020026.outbound.protection.outlook.com [52.101.128.26]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-349-GAASeZufP82rgiesrxr_QQ-1; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 01:01:33 -0400 X-MC-Unique: GAASeZufP82rgiesrxr_QQ-1 Received: from HK0P153MB0324.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:1096:203:b2::13) by KL1P15301MB0498.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:1096:820:57::6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5746.0; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 05:01:28 +0000 Received: from HK0P153MB0324.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::f794:c63b:f3d5:44e]) by HK0P153MB0324.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::f794:c63b:f3d5:44e%6]) with mapi id 15.20.5746.015; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 05:01:27 +0000 From: Kapil Upadhayay To: Roberto Fastec , LVM general discussion and development Thread-Topic: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 : performance drop even after deleting the snapshot Thread-Index: AQHY4AuMxGZRZQRC1EeDhnC5sBfzRq4QpaNg Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 05:01:27 +0000 Message-ID: References: <2e6bad30-2ebf-4162-b62d-092c3ad14003@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2e6bad30-2ebf-4162-b62d-092c3ad14003@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: msip_labels: MSIP_Label_f42aa342-8706-4288-bd11-ebb85995028c_ActionId=d10ce97f-dfd3-47ae-a61d-e4edcfbc2874; MSIP_Label_f42aa342-8706-4288-bd11-ebb85995028c_ContentBits=0; MSIP_Label_f42aa342-8706-4288-bd11-ebb85995028c_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_f42aa342-8706-4288-bd11-ebb85995028c_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_f42aa342-8706-4288-bd11-ebb85995028c_Name=Internal; MSIP_Label_f42aa342-8706-4288-bd11-ebb85995028c_SetDate=2022-10-16T07:42:38Z; MSIP_Label_f42aa342-8706-4288-bd11-ebb85995028c_SiteId=72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47 x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: HK0P153MB0324:EE_|KL1P15301MB0498:EE_ x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 109aa4ee-5eb8-4269-e5a1-08daaffca5fa x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-ms-exchange-antispam-relay: 0 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0 x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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 x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:HK0P153MB0324.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230022)(4636009)(136003)(376002)(346002)(396003)(366004)(39860400002)(451199015)(33656002)(55016003)(76116006)(4326008)(38070700005)(122000001)(54906003)(110136005)(316002)(5660300002)(66946007)(10290500003)(8676002)(64756008)(66446008)(66476007)(66556008)(38100700002)(82950400001)(82960400001)(166002)(86362001)(966005)(478600001)(26005)(9686003)(53546011)(7696005)(6506007)(8936002)(52536014)(8990500004)(2906002)(41300700001)(71200400001)(186003)(83380400001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102 x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1 x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: =?us-ascii?Q?m49mIy5sl8c/Xi57hRTRlCMa9joAGdA1fKPIkPLzMcnv+A7eeJ7uXCljc1Ui?= =?us-ascii?Q?OuaJOd7UW8YtE1NwmpLg+wgKmdqqOmkS8yGTBxxEshutdNKgZDuP8tS/ujeG?= =?us-ascii?Q?EhviKMFiR8f0c7szfv19XFqf55UHB2ddfYVvga1i95pi8dpdpXBujRquurce?= =?us-ascii?Q?FV5BXQ84lLL5F5rcar/CMnBasKy/JPMd9hQZdQ0po1JPeAzH2ZPDjWoPIqIY?= =?us-ascii?Q?0v41Y8EcNSFa0azrMhfhDdaJL0Qwq+dEFn76m5cvq6r9m1TcAMC9uzGmCBeF?= =?us-ascii?Q?U1dpUar9ltH4MlugFQqaCNOnpHQAJOMuvAs3a1Xzk04tEUsp0RRx1LHgeQvj?= =?us-ascii?Q?wecMKFeMRYSYVgp4MOxqKaifBsnyL8r8AFdBY4yAuPfEqUBeMs9UuYSGv3bp?= =?us-ascii?Q?+8Zi/r3mW+VClotTU2tBDsskKH8Ws/VPNVevdZUflA0KNgormDm1YNVo5bNY?= =?us-ascii?Q?SnWE1HxW6Wn0ETT0u8r7Uzmd77X7neWBYaMPIhKGCXS7yPk+hskFNLfrRdIH?= =?us-ascii?Q?W6ISZRdk4L+tK/3rrn/S0ZxF0n78vQ23i751tzPpuu/kM47eUbST9GsFb9nQ?= =?us-ascii?Q?NtJr4tiOMbEjah8e96VZ+YRIxqCmhFmVyOB4f7Ev2iGpcEFguhewWKLajGTU?= =?us-ascii?Q?hd+fhnIMh70uxycwd+8ECxO5rRoxfVXJwR4FBA0y2eHiFfH+FZeqWz3rKz5y?= =?us-ascii?Q?yYka8XFaise+HS27P7bTQGYLWfrEvUKzZOhVROQA2aOOV25C3SBfeh0xQPDy?= =?us-ascii?Q?blcIwVkZP292zbqlVrN2582MyVDqfMUpVd0JXGV0oKEVWF6gb2qc8A7yML8x?= =?us-ascii?Q?PRLbMbfGZ31ZVAOJkzULVrmUWcJIMKmJPcb+aq5/nJbfkQdYpdnRNeubt/hz?= =?us-ascii?Q?HqCW2p0zecCqOlPc1WK+/qOLeD1i/iTji4v1AY5sekDYOTEjlH9gGX/6/TIq?= =?us-ascii?Q?BwoQRi2xjOmqnoP1ntIGlCXlSX9DDeJyFF3E6kfZtxzYDX+yhTwR8uNlejpd?= =?us-ascii?Q?alNFPVxyiYg1dntYTHoYXQaJjmFJEkNJ9JSbAQbRVdvXsf6e30Fuga2nJswl?= =?us-ascii?Q?SEdbphSQ+ojhHRFDJExnUa7mhzMTz/tdxCU/+AEGgvYkcUo9qR6OvOTw6iUj?= =?us-ascii?Q?0StFWM3f427ZVKCUhmmIVqgEczxi1/AiIEarrxQ+62VCWoqlJvT3sO7nvoQi?= =?us-ascii?Q?FFQuAGZ3Me+xb0z7EBIKvMLfmf/57yF197Hp9Hc3azCnS7WX9AisNIZLWSUe?= =?us-ascii?Q?Bs5oBO3AyUzJJ/vdRFdzbsQyU3XCju1XDlDt2BDzJsiN/ZEJpunxKYnQa726?= =?us-ascii?Q?bfu04zGXE/2j+7RJNf7dM+Rpa9VOU5ANmmW3B2TvMV1tpB9n/V/Q0HTkHq//?= =?us-ascii?Q?+1bcloouS747Hhv5FvDfDrw27mWD56i7VV9dyMW8WAmoLH1440EMtnX8+0JG?= =?us-ascii?Q?qIV+mYiY/LdtXyhOHrnvKKE2OUjoBLe4VbboSthKLLH8ZXo1/m8h1+jriDyg?= =?us-ascii?Q?EltsTMAlH2Rx0mtX13MuPD8tnsv/oLUTbXoo?= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: HK0P153MB0324.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 109aa4ee-5eb8-4269-e5a1-08daaffca5fa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Oct 2022 05:01:27.7336 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: zy7Qs8pPNOo++uA640nKGTBs3tAK5TPM9lIJ5VTPYitDqyd9hFaVCVE3VwSTsT7ssbU0NtZUVlgvsaUZThIxVVjQpMM44rp5qP4YlCiTZ/0= X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: KL1P15301MB0498 X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.9 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 07:31:03 +0000 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 : performance drop even after deleting the snapshot X-BeenThere: linux-lvm@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development Cc: "lvm-devel@redhat.com" , Mitta Sai Chaithanya Errors-To: linux-lvm-bounces@redhat.com Sender: "linux-lvm" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.9 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0296677216401875084==" --===============0296677216401875084== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_HK0P153MB03244D79ED10AEAC52F60EF6C2299HK0P153MB0324APCP_" --_000_HK0P153MB03244D79ED10AEAC52F60EF6C2299HK0P153MB0324APCP_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The thin volume was created on a block disk provided by Microsoft Azure Man= aged disk provisioned on premium SSD which is ready to be used in productio= n environment. The disk can provide sustained Max IOPs at 5000. Thanks, Kapil Upadhayay. From: Roberto Fastec Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2022 1:58 AM To: LVM general discussion and development Cc: Kapil Upadhayay ; Mitta Sai Chaithanya ; lvm-devel@redhat.com Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 : performance drop even after dele= ting the snapshot Some people who received this message don't often get email from roberto.fa= stec@gmail.com. Learn why this is importan= t TIP and HINT forget SSDs with LVM unless of enterprise level especially if you are going to use/implement the thin provisioning How to identify an SSD of enterprise level: it costs from 1,00 euro per gigabyte up to 1,50 euro per gigabyte Kind regards Roberto Gini Technical Manager @ www.RecuperoDatiRAIDFAsTec.it Ottieni BlueMail per Android Il giorno 14 ott 2022, alle ore 21:50, Roger Heflin > ha scritto: What is the underlying disk hardware you are running this on? virtual, spinning, ssd, nvme? On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 2:01 AM Pawan Sharma > wrote: adding this to lvm-devel mailing list also. Regards, Pawan ________________________________ From: Pawan Sharma Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 10:42 PM To: linux-lvm@redhat.com > Cc: Mitta Sai Chaithanya >; Kapil Upadhayay > Subject: LVM2 : performance drop even after deleting the snapshot Hi Everyone, We are evaluating lvm2 snapshots and doing performance testing on it. This= is what we are doing : dump some data to lvm2 volume (using fio) take the snapshot delete the snapshot (no IOs anywhere after creating the snapshot) run the fio on lvm2 volume Here as you can see, we are just creating the snapshot and immediately del= eting it. There are no IOs to the main volume or anywhere. When we run the = fio after this (step 4) and we see around 50% drop in performance with refe= rence to the number we get in step 1. It is expected to see a performance drop if there is a snapshot because of= the COW. But here we deleted the snapshot, and it is not referring to any = data also. We should not see any performance drop here. Could someone please help me understand this behavior. Why are we seeing t= he performance drop in this case? It seems like we deleted the snapshot but= still it is not deleted, and we are paying the COW penalty. System Info: OS : ubuntu 18.04 Kernel : 5.4.0 # lvm version LVM version: 2.02.176(2) (2017-11-03) Library version: 1.02.145 (2017-11-03) Driver version: 4.41.0 We also tried on latest ubuntu with newer version of LVM. We got the same = behavior. Any help/pointers would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. Regards, Pawan ________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ ________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ --_000_HK0P153MB03244D79ED10AEAC52F60EF6C2299HK0P153MB0324APCP_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The thin volume was created on a block disk provided= by Microsoft Azure Managed disk provisioned on premium SSD which is ready = to be used in production environment. The disk can provide sustained Max IO= Ps at 5000.

 

Thanks,

Kapil Upadhayay.

 

From: Roberto Fastec <roberto.fastec@gmail= .com>
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2022 1:58 AM
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com&= gt;
Cc: Kapil Upadhayay <kupadhayay@microsoft.com>; Mitta Sai Chai= thanya <mittas@microsoft.com>; lvm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 : performance drop even aft= er deleting the snapshot

 

Some people who received this message don't often get email = from roberto.fastec@gmail.com. Learn why this is important

TIP and HINT

forget SSDs with LVM unless of enterprise level

especially if you are= going to use/implement the thin provisioning

How to identify an SSD of enterprise level:

it costs from 1,00 eu= ro per gigabyte up to 1,50 euro per gigabyte

Kind regards

Roberto Gini

Technical Manager @ <= a href=3D"https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=3Dhttp%3A%2F%= 2Fwww.recuperodatiraidfastec.it%2F&data=3D05%7C01%7Ckupadhayay%40micros= oft.com%7Ccd9e45aadb0c4dd0a03508daae22aa91%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db= 47%7C1%7C0%7C638013761207553033%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDA= iLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata= =3D9i73rMTiPlvD6jlcxLti7Pvrku7jE%2BLciLP57umpwpA%3D&reserved=3D0"> www.RecuperoDatiRAIDFAsTec.it


Il giorno 14 ott 2022, alle ore 21:50, Roger Heflin = <rogerheflin@= gmail.com> ha scritto:

What is the underlying disk hardware you are running this on?
virtu= al, spinning, ssd, nvme?

On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 2:01 AM Pawan Sharm= a <sharmapawan@microsoft.co= m> wrote:

adding this to lvm-devel mailing list also.

Regards,
= Pawan


From: Pawan Sharma
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 10:42 PM=
To: linux-lvm@redhat.com &= lt;linux-lvm@redhat.com>
= Cc: Mitta Sai Chaithanya <mitta= s@microsoft.com>; Kapil Upadhayay <kupadhayay@microsoft.com>
Subject: LVM2 : performa= nce drop even after deleting the snapshot

Hi Everyone,


= We are evaluating lvm2 snapshots and doing performance testing on it. This = is what we are doing :

dump some data to lvm2 volume (using fio) take the snapshot
delete the snapshot (no IOs anywhere after creating= the snapshot)
run the fio on lvm2 volume

Here as you can see, = we are just creating the snapshot and immediately deleting it. There are no= IOs to the main volume or anywhere. When we run the fio after this (step 4= ) and we see around 50% drop in performance with reference to the number we= get in step 1.

It is expected to see a performance drop if there i= s a snapshot because of the COW. But here we deleted the snapshot, and it i= s not referring to any data also. We should not see any performance drop he= re.

Could someone please help me understand this behavior. Why are = we seeing the performance drop in this case? It seems like we deleted the s= napshot but still it is not deleted, and we are paying the COW penalty.
=
System Info:

OS : ubuntu 18.04
Kernel : 5.4.0

# lv= m version
   LVM version:     2.02.176(2) = (2017-11-03)
   Library version: 1.02.145 (2017-11-03)
&nbs= p;  Driver version:  4.41.0

We also tried on latest ubunt= u with newer version of LVM. We got the same behavior.

Any help/poi= nters would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Pawan


linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailm= an/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWT= O/
 


linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
ht= tps://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW= -TO at h= ttp://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
--_000_HK0P153MB03244D79ED10AEAC52F60EF6C2299HK0P153MB0324APCP_-- --===============0296677216401875084== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ --===============0296677216401875084==--