linux-m68k.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
	openrisc@lists.librecores.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 0/7] Introduce __xchg, non-atomic xchg
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 22:24:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <17f40b7c-f98d-789d-fa19-12ec077b756a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y/ZLH5F8LA3H10aL@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 22.02.2023 18:04, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 04:35:22PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> 
>> Andrzej Hajda (7):
>>    arch: rename all internal names __xchg to __arch_xchg
>>    linux/include: add non-atomic version of xchg
>>    arch/*/uprobes: simplify arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr
>>    llist: simplify __llist_del_all
>>    io_uring: use __xchg if possible
>>    qed: use __xchg if possible
>>    drm/i915/gt: use __xchg instead of internal helper
> 
> Nothing crazy in here I suppose, I somewhat wonder why you went through
> the trouble, but meh.

If you are asking why I have proposed this patchset, then the answer is 
simple, 1st I've tried to find a way to move internal i915 helper to 
core (see patch 7).
Then I was looking for possible other users of this helper. And 
apparently there are many of them, patches 3-7 shows some.


> 
> You want me to take this through te locking tree (for the next cycle,
> not this one) where I normally take atomic things or does someone else
> want this?

If you could take it I will be happy.

Regards
Andrzej


  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-23 21:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-18 15:35 [PATCH v5 0/7] Introduce __xchg, non-atomic xchg Andrzej Hajda
2023-01-18 15:44 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] arch: rename all internal names __xchg to __arch_xchg Andrzej Hajda
2023-01-18 15:44   ` [PATCH v5 2/7] linux/include: add non-atomic version of xchg Andrzej Hajda
2023-02-27  9:53     ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2023-01-18 15:44   ` [PATCH v5 3/7] arch/*/uprobes: simplify arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr Andrzej Hajda
2023-02-27  9:54     ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2023-01-18 15:44   ` [PATCH v5 4/7] llist: simplify __llist_del_all Andrzej Hajda
2023-02-27  9:55     ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2023-01-18 15:44   ` [PATCH v5 5/7] io_uring: use __xchg if possible Andrzej Hajda
2023-02-27  9:59     ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2023-01-18 15:44   ` [PATCH v5 6/7] qed: " Andrzej Hajda
2023-02-27  9:56     ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2023-01-18 15:44   ` [PATCH v5 7/7] drm/i915/gt: use __xchg instead of internal helper Andrzej Hajda
2023-02-27  9:58     ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2023-02-27  9:53   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 1/7] arch: rename all internal names __xchg to __arch_xchg Andi Shyti
2023-02-22 10:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 0/7] Introduce __xchg, non-atomic xchg Andrzej Hajda
2023-02-22 17:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-23 21:24   ` Andrzej Hajda [this message]
2023-02-27 13:49     ` [Intel-gfx] " Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-05 14:47       ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-05 16:20         ` Andrzej Hajda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=17f40b7c-f98d-789d-fa19-12ec077b756a@intel.com \
    --to=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).