From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561EFC33CAA for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 21:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E77C24656 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 21:04:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1579640687; bh=f7FfZ/UUMe8S4zn+3x50yAOcJjltmiZc2OrGcfZ4D5g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=BD93wCs9Y6J9+jQITQ5AWl+OFun6jmLNhqeHsIEDE9uCs67BjMmAvX9GrhVXo46g5 I8CDxu3W4i6ehvDz7yhyQUMnu2exXcxRtBXZxsopPKjBuDka5oCVU3y5IQSKDFkDWk 1pNHEsYuTID1IgZyw11teegLU9Mg2D4RZsoI6tq0= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729076AbgAUVEq (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:04:46 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50446 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729052AbgAUVEq (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:04:46 -0500 Received: from X1 (nat-ab2241.sltdut.senawave.net [162.218.216.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 318D924655; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 21:04:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1579640686; bh=f7FfZ/UUMe8S4zn+3x50yAOcJjltmiZc2OrGcfZ4D5g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=zkQ8wPHcIqx0yRpuTxqffi9zPImBGmkKir+qRVRSJ1VBytXCOsQtrzdOHHM3iVYV+ Re8Rl8Y4qyJCF0tzVkkCjlpyerTheEv12H8/YIeeFEtItbf88wCY4t9HeGgyRkO5+5 z681/CVe33tSRpkriWzBqTfYKxRz4L9KTzPjZV/Y= Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 13:04:44 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Davidlohr Bueso , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , linux-m68k , Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/rbtree: avoid pointless rb_node alignment Message-Id: <20200121130444.0f5c39dc1ca6ba393084b14b@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20200120175144.67625skg6eiprpsa@linux-p48b> References: <20200110215429.30360-1-dave@stgolabs.net> <20200120175144.67625skg6eiprpsa@linux-p48b> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 09:51:44 -0800 Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jan 2020, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > >timerqueue_del() uses rbtree, and > > > > #define rb_parent(r) ((struct rb_node *)((r)->__rb_parent_color & ~3)) > > > >relies on all objects being 4-byte aligned. But your patch broke that > >assumption on m68k, where the default alignment is 2-byte. > > > >Andrew: please drop this patch. > > Yeah that's too bad. I'll send a patch improving the comment around the alignment > once the patch is dropped. Thanks, I'll drop this patch.