Linux-m68k Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Cc: Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@huawei.com>,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k/amiga: Add missing platform_device_unregister() call in amiga_init_devices()
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:54:50 +0200
Message-ID: <20200728155450.GC4178776@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1e12105b-aa72-11a2-74f6-c789f8ceaaa3@web.de>

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 04:50:06PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Add the missing platform_device_unregister() before return
> > from amiga_init_devices() in the error handling case.
> 
> Will the tag “Fixes” become helpful for the commit message?
> 
> 
> …
> > +++ b/arch/m68k/amiga/platform.c
> > @@ -188,8 +188,10 @@  static int __init amiga_init_devices(void)
> >  			return PTR_ERR(pdev);
> >  		error = platform_device_add_data(pdev, &a1200_ide_pdata,
> >  						 sizeof(a1200_ide_pdata));
> > -		if (error)
> > +		if (error) {
> > +			platform_device_unregister(pdev);
> >  			return error;
> > +		}
> >  	}
> …
> 
> I suggest to add a jump target for the desired exception handling.
> 
>  		if (error)
> +			goto unregister_device;
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Markus

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all.  The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback.  Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot

      reply index

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-28 14:50 Markus Elfring
2020-07-28 15:54 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200728155450.GC4178776@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=miaoqinglang@huawei.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-m68k Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-m68k/0 linux-m68k/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-m68k linux-m68k/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-m68k \
		linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
	public-inbox-index linux-m68k

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-m68k


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git