From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F7F6C2B9F4 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:16:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D9E61246 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:16:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229734AbhFNXSK (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jun 2021 19:18:10 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f170.google.com ([209.85.210.170]:38596 "EHLO mail-pf1-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229649AbhFNXSJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jun 2021 19:18:09 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f170.google.com with SMTP id z26so11784786pfj.5 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 16:15:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=fQ4+RmqFbthqFKl0okyK5P56e4RJ0Qk2T+muCKi7ia8=; b=iWuwjHGJdVpdycsP2g7VFzEIVvzDBMbee7RYN7/FpDyHNAwFtDUwgdfXqWgzr+BKqr YK8QRmJLTBEt4KNYlouxpkdRw/9jb4V3CvOUQ9hOFmexSNED0jbIuzjOa7IVRei69RNc 7Fz3FE8deDYHVpGyxzC/81IyYXZrMhrfQwNo7BDdNhNW+NQ15QPRUOma68gIv31aKRTw JaB3ZToa9Pr4xaQTDTYNNu2BOUGq39at6zumNbWq3sj9tgQWGnLK6d5AItpBFBI+7l2V 22eOy2T2szyoodFkofW8IHNajHo1kpOrccVZO4JqHcGwHddIxc9gwLjw66WLCqUS5Owy 5IMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=fQ4+RmqFbthqFKl0okyK5P56e4RJ0Qk2T+muCKi7ia8=; b=lIaJZCWT81j/zkygt/lJ/79knLeY4qjF5xg9hbel+xSWgo2tJgKwPUn5RvzAeOqA8q pUUGmRegWSmO0iJDwHG8ML8z3yoHxhYt1VTOOlWe5mWrrV6vIvU7z9OL+zTpK9v5bbPb dzwKpXXDjHeDe1Zo+M0JaTeyhIxhcPWubkhqDQqKrrpP7ThE7glayf8H+cSdUuc1Ty0V Ie/9fQz+ERYgKb7Vb79gxQbTGr+3mfyBqAmbPDWTJDXDJ6kzjQDT7fCFmEo0Iw+YwdLw XZSsI5V4zzQylY2XFSR41grzjz6r2QQOqrkjF3O/P47yeDDg2Be7YYr2sQwRXt2sVzAy 2Chw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532QnYty+Wqrp1H4UhYXXGYhIiDXDMYICuGmx5vD7M4b0O96rOhe b4rc1+n1xBZ0zM7lX7s/G7Xzx2ZH058gWw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzgA7tUdEu5sDgz/RR3IShpw9XGduMbu4JI/nl8pK8AgVAq7c0Rxgqz2Eo0EGJtlFbunkmMSQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:1f25:: with SMTP id f37mr2961378pgf.61.1623712496684; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 16:14:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:df0:0:200c:108d:81dd:b77d:48cd? ([2001:df0:0:200c:108d:81dd:b77d:48cd]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 60sm13270021pjz.42.2021.06.14.16.14.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Jun 2021 16:14:56 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k/kernel - wire up syscall_trace_enter/leave for m68k To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Linux/m68k , Andreas Schwab References: <1595823555-11103-1-git-send-email-schmitzmic@gmail.com> <855486ab-736a-19ad-35c2-174b5eb59898@gmail.com> <0292f4c9-40c1-6469-07f6-91722806216b@gmail.com> <76e2f396-ec94-2615-4fea-0f33f6564f19@gmail.com> <67009443-6963-c66d-9c3d-0a4d79664b71@physik.fu-berlin.de> From: Michael Schmitz Message-ID: <2dd5ced6-ed01-c029-be5c-4dbfee2d9d05@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 11:14:51 +1200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <67009443-6963-c66d-9c3d-0a4d79664b71@physik.fu-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org Hi Adrian, On 15/06/21 11:04 am, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 6/15/21 12:11 AM, Michael Schmitz wrote: >> working on entry.S recently, I was reminded of this one. It's never been applied, and I can't find a trace of it in my tree. >> >> Not sure how far Adrian got with seccomp support testing, so I'm uncertain this is still of interest ... > I still have a fork of libseccomp with m68k support and my SH support patch > was merged upstream. > > So, if you guys can get the kernel bits in place, I can take care of libseccomp. Thanks - what (aside from my old patch) is still missing on the kernel side? Cheers,     Michael > > Adrian >