From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68221C2B9F4 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 18:42:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425F260FDB for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 18:42:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229630AbhFYSov (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 14:44:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57762 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229531AbhFYSov (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 14:44:51 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x52c.google.com (mail-pg1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1875C061574 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:42:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id a2so8573046pgi.6 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:42:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iqkVGvlGqvnagaeE+6ZdPO8ENhnfxCC1XyhBdWI8das=; b=VgP2tDiFk5Iw++DNlQtucxUt86pdkWDohObWTWOIz4R99Kw3WmboOQch9cdHPZ9iDF LIFgWL1bHdM4LX02Qgr1sY2NDJcp9ZsE8/pDn4B9one8kfbgMGtUX7k8M621p0AR5ORS rK7cW9RztlNk6l+LEoho/jZW/APgiYwd3r0BDdGzsJao9ldejChdgpMit5VIkrZcksDY 11mTkMBHx+ZvaRmLxMNf/Y0s1EuirfWObD2+V3CnbR4KkuJYeXBz7lqJ8yonxH6nL07Z QtAyDbLx6lhqC3l5hca2pj4Om2MpNCLhaEjKNgh0ShYAga1ALbJVKpncP2/w70GzlEr2 78yw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iqkVGvlGqvnagaeE+6ZdPO8ENhnfxCC1XyhBdWI8das=; b=siBeC58vnt8oYo4QPNv2SeKmDPeQqoNStFIPIe9BW72Pp8vEXyarac8/4QN5MXe5/r Yd2tJ/raYv3/oErHlrrMukvVYzALkwn16u06KevoaFsLIrUwaAWJ2OxAHaLoHDODEL2f qd+42X3l6xCnX9PL1SZ0lv4XCktgvQ5SF8SKKbWDTwTHrm0pC92wHSfbMBB3geVXhGoh BkAHI+hm3t7XYN4x78VhopGXWXOQASKBJiQgCjSki6QSNmGSJTyn8iF5jmWHOrOoA2Yq Ylvp200HaIHQ3Oc1sH2gCn0wLgUXXwEMVHls7gO3RBCxYIbGpwnA3CJNsiNqS76IfGOV 3x9A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5308GZa3akTwTqU5dh4zEKpdURbmqA+X6oc5j0CvmT3RoWbOfOJY zI+BMkbaC0KnbnMzDkF/LYm5BreDrPE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwoDkyUqVHZb2qYvEWN5EBnDdA6JGtWmDm6ZHTUCHwF/F0RBwGMYU0+2ZcFwhCh/NoMhz6HlQ== X-Received: by 2002:a62:5c1:0:b029:2a9:7589:dd30 with SMTP id 184-20020a6205c10000b02902a97589dd30mr11917020pff.66.1624646549046; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:42:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.1.25] (222-152-189-137-fibre.sparkbb.co.nz. [222.152.189.137]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p1sm6213088pfp.137.2021.06.25.11.42.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:42:28 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] m68k: add kernel seccomp support To: Geert Uytterhoeven References: <1623908361-29837-1-git-send-email-schmitzmic@gmail.com> <1623908361-29837-2-git-send-email-schmitzmic@gmail.com> <78dee109-3714-073c-110b-3d023f66f815@gmail.com> Cc: Linux/m68k , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Andreas Schwab From: Michael Schmitz Message-ID: <3c7cb5b1-4a31-2802-dc60-021c67aa06d3@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 06:42:23 +1200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux ppc; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org Hi Geert, Am 25.06.2021 um 19:31 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: > Hi Michael, > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:20 PM Michael Schmitz wrote: >> On 23/06/21 7:35 pm, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>> BTW, there was also "[PATCH] [WIP] selftests/seccomp: Add m68k support" >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-m68k/alpine.DEB.2.21.2008261315050.25325@ramsan.of.borg/ >>> >>> I kept on up-porting it, but haven't exercised it recently. >> >> See attached for test results on my ARAnyM image (Laurent's qemu image, >> essentially). >> >> Is that any different from what you got in your earlier tests? > > Fortunately lore has a better memory than I do ;-) > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-m68k/alpine.DEB.2.21.2008261612360.2926@ramsan.of.borg/ > > mine: FAILED: 35 / 86 tests passed > yours: FAILED: 35 / 87 tests passed > > So one new test, and it fails? Looks like it. I must be missing some mail in my mail archive, can't recall ever seeing that one. There's one new test added after your mail was sent - KILL_unknown. I suppose it's that one. Anyway, both much better than without seccomp support. And going back over the archive, I found your patch where you added seccomp.h - and added a line in Kbuild as well, which I forgot. Will fix that. Cheers, Michael > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert >