From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com>,
Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] lib: Introduce test_stackinit module
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:52:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdW6N40+0gGQ+LSrN64Mo4A0-ELAm0pR3gWQ0mNanyBuUQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190212180441.15340-3-keescook@chromium.org>
Hi Kees,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 7:08 PM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> Adds test for stack initialization coverage. We have several build options
> that control the level of stack variable initialization. This test lets us
> visualize which options cover which cases, and provide tests for some of
> the pathological padding conditions the compiler will sometimes fail to
> initialize.
With current upstream, using gcc Ubuntu 8.2.0-1ubuntu2~18.04, I get
on m68k:
test_stackinit: u8_zero: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: u8_zero: fill 1 wide
test_stackinit: u8_zero: target offset by 20
test_stackinit: u16_zero: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: u16_zero: fill 2 wide
test_stackinit: u16_zero: target offset by 20
test_stackinit: u32_zero: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: u32_zero: fill 4 wide
test_stackinit: u32_zero: target offset by 20
test_stackinit: u64_zero: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: u64_zero: fill 8 wide
test_stackinit: u64_zero: target offset by 20
test_stackinit: char_array_zero: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: char_array_zero: fill 16 wide
test_stackinit: char_array_zero: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: small_hole_zero: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: small_hole_zero: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: small_hole_zero: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: big_hole_zero ok
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_zero: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_zero: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_zero: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: packed_zero: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: packed_zero: fill 16 wide
test_stackinit: packed_zero: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: small_hole_dynamic_partial: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: small_hole_dynamic_partial: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: small_hole_dynamic_partial: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: big_hole_dynamic_partial ok
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_dynamic_partial: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_dynamic_partial: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_dynamic_partial: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: packed_dynamic_partial: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: packed_dynamic_partial: fill 16 wide
test_stackinit: packed_dynamic_partial: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: small_hole_static_partial: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: small_hole_static_partial: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: small_hole_static_partial: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: big_hole_static_partial ok
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_static_partial: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_static_partial: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_static_partial: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: packed_static_partial: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: packed_static_partial: fill 16 wide
test_stackinit: packed_static_partial: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: small_hole_static_all: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: small_hole_static_all: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: small_hole_static_all: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: big_hole_static_all FAIL (uninit bytes: 61)
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_static_all: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_static_all: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_static_all: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: packed_static_all: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: packed_static_all: fill 16 wide
test_stackinit: packed_static_all: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: small_hole_dynamic_all: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: small_hole_dynamic_all: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: small_hole_dynamic_all: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: big_hole_dynamic_all FAIL (uninit bytes: 61)
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_dynamic_all: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_dynamic_all: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_dynamic_all: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: packed_dynamic_all: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: packed_dynamic_all: fill 16 wide
test_stackinit: packed_dynamic_all: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: small_hole_runtime_partial: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: small_hole_runtime_partial: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: small_hole_runtime_partial: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: big_hole_runtime_partial FAIL (uninit bytes: 127)
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_runtime_partial: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_runtime_partial: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_runtime_partial: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: packed_runtime_partial: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: packed_runtime_partial: fill 16 wide
test_stackinit: packed_runtime_partial: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: small_hole_runtime_all: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: small_hole_runtime_all: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: small_hole_runtime_all: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: big_hole_runtime_all FAIL (uninit bytes: 61)
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_runtime_all: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_runtime_all: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_runtime_all: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: packed_runtime_all: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: packed_runtime_all: fill 16 wide
test_stackinit: packed_runtime_all: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: u8_none: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: u8_none: fill 1 wide
test_stackinit: u8_none: target offset by 20
test_stackinit: u16_none: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: u16_none: fill 2 wide
test_stackinit: u16_none: target offset by 20
test_stackinit: u32_none: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: u32_none: fill 4 wide
test_stackinit: u32_none: target offset by 20
test_stackinit: u64_none: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: u64_none: fill 8 wide
test_stackinit: u64_none: target offset by 20
test_stackinit: char_array_none: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: char_array_none: fill 16 wide
test_stackinit: char_array_none: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: switch_1_none: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: switch_1_none: fill 8 wide
test_stackinit: switch_1_none: target offset by 16
test_stackinit: switch_2_none: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: switch_2_none: fill 8 wide
test_stackinit: switch_2_none: target offset by 16
test_stackinit: small_hole_none: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: small_hole_none: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: small_hole_none: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: big_hole_none FAIL (uninit bytes: 128)
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_none: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_none: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_none: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: packed_none: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: packed_none: fill 16 wide
test_stackinit: packed_none: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: user: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: user: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: user: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: failures: 42
Any idea what is wrong? I find the test code a bit hard to understand...
Also, I see comments making assumptions that are not true:
struct test_small_hole {
size_t one;
char two;
/* 3 byte padding hole here. */
int three;
unsigned long four;
};
On m68k (and a few other architectures), integrals of 16-bit and larger
are aligned to a 2-byte address, so the padding may be only a single byte.
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
next parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-11 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190212180441.15340-1-keescook@chromium.org>
[not found] ` <20190212180441.15340-3-keescook@chromium.org>
2019-03-11 10:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2019-04-23 22:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] lib: Introduce test_stackinit module Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMuHMdW6N40+0gGQ+LSrN64Mo4A0-ELAm0pR3gWQ0mNanyBuUQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=alex.popov@linux.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=re.emese@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).