From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300BBC433B4 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 07:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091AE6102A for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 07:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238004AbhDSHlG (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 03:41:06 -0400 Received: from mail-ua1-f52.google.com ([209.85.222.52]:41730 "EHLO mail-ua1-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237995AbhDSHk7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 03:40:59 -0400 Received: by mail-ua1-f52.google.com with SMTP id z23so9485428uan.8 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:40:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2VIr1L+x0KMjslWLfGf5hIF0vYoVyKryX0VbeLPhjXY=; b=nRVnSPqVndeRU26QhVxz4yZtoUX679jqqk/O/bdeuVUTujrPZXwM+HiHV91WpPrRGe oPCC+6wMzJqQAuxg3RJtvlyPgRwDjJeWMXAc8ziPdoRyN9D5nGegolOYCeMDI3uJtld7 77cOBDqy6KbQjx4tdkrl6dBTg09Qr7KOMuFDF2a5x1Zh5ZWp1Tjl8jN+FTHBkLgOKut2 HtgZNwBcPltgHDc3IplTEs2pLqoOyaXPuewHniFipF59AaeWIQ9iAg4U87gOyHig5Gu9 Oso0xjstutkqeWJL1ATr1HmC300Wfnc955nSA60QPMt1SKDtZJq/rLIUMQyMVIpkqFic MkTg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530y9JP7rITR7tfiyEKCf4XqJDdqMfFV4WjbAMu0Dv1gq/Z/ZAC3 U7y7gCotipE7wHAq7lrwuNjAQ94QFUvMTwdDU7M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwwXmXRA54KsUIVTR+3h20psdWGNGLb0sv7M0Wa6xBFjtt5vw5IgsA9I8yZw3/8pDlvTRTO5cNvRqQf/YEF4l8= X-Received: by 2002:a9f:3852:: with SMTP id q18mr5818471uad.58.1618818028444; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:40:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <0fa191715b236766ad13c5f786d8daf92a9a0cf2.1618388989.git.npache@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:40:17 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] kunit: mptcp: adhear to KUNIT formatting standard To: David Gow Cc: Matthieu Baerts , Nico Pache , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Brendan Higgins , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ext4 Developers List , Networking , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-m68k , "Theodore Ts'o" , Mat Martineau , "David S. Miller" , Mark Brown , Shuah Khan , mptcp@lists.linux.dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org Hi David, On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 6:24 AM David Gow wrote: > > Like patch 1/6, I can apply it in MPTCP tree and send it later to > > net-next with other patches. > > Except if you guys prefer to apply it in KUnit tree and send it to > > linux-next? > > Given 1/6 is going to net-next, it makes sense to send this out that > way too, then, IMHO. > The only slight concern I have is that the m68k test config patch in > the series will get split from the others, but that should resolve > itself when they pick up the last patch. I can apply the m68k test config patch when all other parts have entered mainline. Note that I would have made the same changes myself anyway, on -rc1 defconfig refresh. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds