From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz Subject: Re: Atari label false positives Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 13:24:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <2d6f5455-963d-b044-a64d-67634df46071@ubuntu.com> <35ad9889-bc13-56bd-7831-f7bb3eea2d1e@physik.fu-berlin.de> <874bf955-d5bc-5d9c-0f87-445da67f3bdd@ubuntu.com> <80a28dd6-ce19-e6ed-fc7a-c5561fecf989@gmail.com> <82528a79-31d5-e8c9-08db-253462619197@physik.fu-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: parted-devel-bounces+gcgpd-parted-devel=m.gmane.org-wVTzQnVv9Y8Rm1jG9FmulZdwIE86Xf0q@public.gmane.org Sender: "parted-devel" To: Michael Schmitz , Phillip Susi Cc: Parted development , Linux/m68k , Debian m68k List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org On 05/12/2018 10:41 AM, Michael Schmitz wrote: >>> Do you have a dump of the root sector (plus additional eventual extended >>> partition root sector) from these bugs? >> >> This is a very good point. We should have a look at the probing code in >> the kernel because apparently the problem doesn't exist there. > > It may not exist because the MSDOS partition detection is specific > enough to reject Atari partition tables. But still, compare the kernel > partition parsers to see what may be missing. Which would mean that the kernel probes for DOS partition tables before Atari partition tables, wouldn't it? Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz-8fiUuRrzOP0dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz-1Olz3AKvcsuAKZTfuerNgRvVK+yQ3ZXh@public.gmane.org `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913