linux-man.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com>
To: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: fweimer@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, ville.voutilainen@gmail.com,
	linux-man@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org,
	libc-coord@lists.openwall.com, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
	jwakely@redhat.com, enh@google.com
Subject: Re: Ping(3): [PATCH v4] <sys/param.h>: Add nitems()
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:26:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01e7fc2d-d883-fec7-38cd-0a209dd549ba@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2011172308010.28480@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>



On 11/18/20 12:11 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha wrote:
> 
>> Nice!
>> Please update me on any feedback you receive.
> 
> Apparently the author is planning new versions of those papers so WG14 
> discussion is waiting for those.
> 
>> So glibc will basically hold this patch
>> at least until the WG answers to that, right?
> 
> I think that whether C2x gets an array-size feature of some kind is 
> relevant to whether such a feature goes in glibc and what it looks like in 
> glibc, but the fact that it will be considered in WG14 doesn't rule out 
> glibc considering such a feature without waiting for WG14.
> 

Hi Joseph,

Yes, that's what I would expect, but it's been a long time since I sent
the patch, so that's why I asked.
Maybe glibc is busy now with other more urgent things, I don't know.

Thanks,

Alex

      reply	other threads:[~2020-11-18 11:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-28 19:12 [PATCH v4] <sys/param.h>: Add nitems() Alejandro Colomar
2020-10-11 16:43 ` Ping: " Alejandro Colomar
2020-10-27 11:38 ` Ping(2): " Alejandro Colomar
2020-11-17 22:23 ` Ping(3): " Alejandro Colomar
2020-11-17 22:44   ` Joseph Myers
2020-11-17 22:59     ` Alejandro Colomar
2020-11-17 23:11       ` Joseph Myers
2020-11-18 11:26         ` Alejandro Colomar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01e7fc2d-d883-fec7-38cd-0a209dd549ba@gmail.com \
    --to=colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com \
    --cc=enh@google.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=jwakely@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=libc-coord@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=ville.voutilainen@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).