From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89231C3A59E for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:44:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3425F2332A for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:44:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=truelite.it header.i=@truelite.it header.b="F4XzmR+v" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726828AbfHUQow (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Aug 2019 12:44:52 -0400 Received: from jojo.truelite.it ([144.76.21.38]:49896 "EHLO jojo.truelite.it" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726252AbfHUQow (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Aug 2019 12:44:52 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by jojo.truelite.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A531C1B3B; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 18:44:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at truelite.it Received: from jojo.truelite.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (jojo.truelite.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11HOmfQrIVyV; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 18:44:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.154] (unknown [151.61.7.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by jojo.truelite.it (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DDFD6C1B27; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 18:44:47 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=truelite.it; s=mail; t=1566405888; bh=wVVKagiVo41CLBCGV8Y50zpGSgo9EI0iBX+5+mW1ut0=; h=To:Cc:From:Subject:Date:From; b=F4XzmR+vRLxCsjKwEjTF34vMtrgT3nqxLHQVFyT/zkXot2Fs05Zw5i54UbzrgiibI Uj3+ZthToBmRuQj+4rE5dZ97lmcDkS57dY5Xl/s8lI0WJSqQGWdsCN/P/I6FWFY0JY HfLFjxiehU15awbKvRc9CuJnOpxiW75AxMHTi8svSXOlzJWKpnj2EUCPIYeE4mV+ug qJAbPk9dKx4nOCRbhpq9oqHGOhtYbK7vNhfC4YVkn4bYzNyAWyoH2hXVMxXi9LX9Vg EY3joE8PiCe0mFTtY7bfingq7nkwt7FI1yHuoOSHu8ENnnpCkuvevx+2zUd7mCZVUx 84XJFTfXJ5/rQ== To: mtk.manpages@gmail.com Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org From: Simone Piccardi Subject: fececve man page Message-ID: <044d4f18-fe49-7e25-ddae-844ce6a50b7a@truelite.it> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 18:44:47 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-man-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org In http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/fexecve.3.html in the reported errors there are only EINVAL and ENOSYS but in the BUGS section is cited also ENOENT (I suppose coming from execveat) for trying to use a script. Furthermore I think that ENOSYS should be cited as present only when fexecve is not implemented using execveat. Regards Simone