From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Brauner Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] signal: add procfd_signal() syscall Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 19:29:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20181119182902.fadw6qiu3eepndm3@brauner.io> References: <20181119103241.5229-1-christian@brauner.io> <20181119103241.5229-3-christian@brauner.io> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Colascione Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-kernel , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Jann Horn , Andy Lutomirski , Andrew Morton , Oleg Nesterov , Aleksa Sarai , Al Viro , Linux FS Devel , Linux API , Tim Murray , linux-man , Kees Cook List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:59:24AM -0800, Daniel Colascione wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 2:32 AM, Christian Brauner wrote: > > The kill() syscall operates on process identifiers. After a process has > > exited its pid can be reused by another process. If a caller sends a signal > > to a reused pid it will end up signaling the wrong process. This issue has > > often surfaced and there has been a push [1] to address this problem. > > > > A prior patch has introduced the ability to get a file descriptor > > referencing struct pid by opening /proc/. This guarantees a stable > > handle on a process which can be used to send signals to the referenced > > process. Discussion has shown that a dedicated syscall is preferable over > > ioctl()s. Thus, the new syscall procfd_signal() is introduced to solve > > this problem. It operates on a process file descriptor. > > The syscall takes an additional siginfo_t and flags argument. If siginfo_t > > is NULL then procfd_signal() behaves like kill() if it is not NULL it > > behaves like rt_sigqueueinfo. > > The flags argument is added to allow for future extensions of this syscall. > > It currently needs to be passed as 0. > > > > With this patch a process can be killed via: > > > > #define _GNU_SOURCE > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > > > int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > > { > > int ret; > > char buf[1000]; > > > > if (argc < 2) > > exit(EXIT_FAILURE); > > > > ret = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "/proc/%s", argv[1]); > > if (ret < 0) > > exit(EXIT_FAILURE); > > > > int fd = open(buf, O_DIRECTORY | O_CLOEXEC); > > if (fd < 0) { > > printf("%s - Failed to open \"%s\"\n", strerror(errno), buf); > > exit(EXIT_FAILURE); > > } > > > > ret = syscall(__NR_procfd_signal, fd, SIGKILL, NULL, 0); > > if (ret < 0) { > > printf("Failed to send SIGKILL \"%s\"\n", strerror(errno)); > > close(fd); > > exit(EXIT_FAILURE); > > } > > > > close(fd); > > > > exit(EXIT_SUCCESS); > > } > > > > [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/18/130 > > > > Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" > > Cc: Serge Hallyn > > Cc: Jann Horn > > Cc: Kees Cook > > Cc: Andy Lutomirsky > > Cc: Andrew Morton > > Cc: Oleg Nesterov > > Cc: Aleksa Sarai > > Cc: Al Viro > > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner > > --- > > Changelog: > > v1: > > - patch introduced > > --- > > arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl | 1 + > > arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 1 + > > fs/proc/base.c | 6 ++ > > include/linux/proc_fs.h | 1 + > > include/linux/syscalls.h | 2 + > > kernel/signal.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > 6 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl b/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl > > index 3cf7b533b3d1..e637eab883e9 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl > > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl > > @@ -398,3 +398,4 @@ > > 384 i386 arch_prctl sys_arch_prctl __ia32_compat_sys_arch_prctl > > 385 i386 io_pgetevents sys_io_pgetevents __ia32_compat_sys_io_pgetevents > > 386 i386 rseq sys_rseq __ia32_sys_rseq > > +387 i386 procfd_signal sys_procfd_signal __ia32_sys_procfd_signal > > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl b/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl > > index f0b1709a5ffb..e95f6741ab42 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl > > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl > > @@ -343,6 +343,7 @@ > > 332 common statx __x64_sys_statx > > 333 common io_pgetevents __x64_sys_io_pgetevents > > 334 common rseq __x64_sys_rseq > > +335 common procfd_signal __x64_sys_procfd_signal > > > > # > > # x32-specific system call numbers start at 512 to avoid cache impact > > diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c > > index 6365a4fea314..a12c9de92bd0 100644 > > --- a/fs/proc/base.c > > +++ b/fs/proc/base.c > > @@ -3055,6 +3055,12 @@ static const struct file_operations proc_tgid_base_operations = { > > .release = proc_tgid_release, > > }; > > > > +bool proc_is_procfd(const struct file *file) > > +{ > > + return d_is_dir(file->f_path.dentry) && > > + (file->f_op == &proc_tgid_base_operations); > > +} > > + > > static struct dentry *proc_tgid_base_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags) > > { > > return proc_pident_lookup(dir, dentry, > > diff --git a/include/linux/proc_fs.h b/include/linux/proc_fs.h > > index d0e1f1522a78..2d53a47fba34 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/proc_fs.h > > +++ b/include/linux/proc_fs.h > > @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry *proc_create_net_single_write(const char *name, umode_t mo > > int (*show)(struct seq_file *, void *), > > proc_write_t write, > > void *data); > > +extern bool proc_is_procfd(const struct file *file); > > > > #else /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */ > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/syscalls.h b/include/linux/syscalls.h > > index 2ac3d13a915b..a5ca8cb84566 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/syscalls.h > > +++ b/include/linux/syscalls.h > > @@ -907,6 +907,8 @@ asmlinkage long sys_statx(int dfd, const char __user *path, unsigned flags, > > unsigned mask, struct statx __user *buffer); > > asmlinkage long sys_rseq(struct rseq __user *rseq, uint32_t rseq_len, > > int flags, uint32_t sig); > > +asmlinkage long sys_procfd_signal(int fd, int sig, siginfo_t __user *info, > > + int flags); > > > > /* > > * Architecture-specific system calls > > diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c > > index 9a32bc2088c9..e8a8929de710 100644 > > --- a/kernel/signal.c > > +++ b/kernel/signal.c > > @@ -19,7 +19,9 @@ > > #include > > #include > > #include > > +#include > > #include > > +#include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > @@ -3286,6 +3288,16 @@ COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE4(rt_sigtimedwait, compat_sigset_t __user *, uthese, > > } > > #endif > > > > +static inline void prepare_kill_siginfo(int sig, struct kernel_siginfo *info) > > +{ > > + clear_siginfo(info); > > + info->si_signo = sig; > > + info->si_errno = 0; > > + info->si_code = SI_USER; > > + info->si_pid = task_tgid_vnr(current); > > + info->si_uid = from_kuid_munged(current_user_ns(), current_uid()); > > +} > > + > > /** > > * sys_kill - send a signal to a process > > * @pid: the PID of the process > > @@ -3295,16 +3307,68 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(kill, pid_t, pid, int, sig) > > { > > struct kernel_siginfo info; > > > > - clear_siginfo(&info); > > - info.si_signo = sig; > > - info.si_errno = 0; > > - info.si_code = SI_USER; > > - info.si_pid = task_tgid_vnr(current); > > - info.si_uid = from_kuid_munged(current_user_ns(), current_uid()); > > + prepare_kill_siginfo(sig, &info); > > > > return kill_something_info(sig, &info, pid); > > } > > > > +/** > > + * sys_procfd_signal - send a signal to a process through a process file > > + * descriptor > > + * @fd: the file descriptor of the process > > + * @sig: signal to be sent > > + * @info: the signal info > > + * @flags: future flags to be passed > > + */ > > +SYSCALL_DEFINE4(procfd_signal, int, fd, int, sig, siginfo_t __user *, info, > > + int, flags) > > +{ > > + int ret; > > + struct pid *pid; > > + kernel_siginfo_t kinfo; > > + struct fd f; > > + > > + /* Enforce flags be set to 0 until we add an extension. */ > > + if (flags) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + f = fdget_raw(fd); > > + if (!f.file) > > + return -EBADF; > > + > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > + /* Is this a process file descriptor? */ > > + if (!proc_is_procfd(f.file)) > > + goto err; > > + > > + pid = f.file->private_data; > > You never addressed my comment on the previous patch about your use of Sorry, that thread exploded so quickly that I might have missed it. > private_data here. Why can't you use the struct pid reference that's > already in the inode? If that's what people prefer we can probably use that. There was precedent for stashing away such data in fs/proc/base.c already for various other things including user namespaces and struct mm so I followed this model. A prior version of my patch (I didn't send out) did retrive the inode via proc_pid() in .open() took an additional reference via get_pid() and dropped it in .release(). Do we prefer that?