From: Arkadiusz Drabczyk <arkadiusz@drabczyk.org>
To: "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com>
Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, linux-man@vger.kernel.org,
Ian Hunter <ian@ianhunter.me>
Subject: Re: Error in read.1p
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 21:35:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190928193506.GA21590@comp.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190927174541.cykfcoglc2v4ovud@localhost.localdomain>
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 03:45:43AM +1000, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> I don't have manpages-posix-2013a installed (because I'm a Debian
> user and the package is in Debian's unofficial non-free package archive,
> which I don't use).
>
> But I grabbed the source package, unpacked it, and took a closer look.
>
> The text of the man page sources is derived from the POSIX standard
> which is copyrighted by IEEE, and not licensed for modification.
>
> Nothing indicates who was responsible for the preparation of these man
> page sources. As you noted below, recent Austin Group bug traffic
> suggests to me that they maintain nroff sources for at least part of the
> IEEE 1003 standards documentation; whether these man pages were
> generated or hand-written is not clear, but on inspection they're clean
> enough to be the latter.
>
> > I think this might make people want to report such bugs here.
>
> You're right, it sure looks that way. I was mistaken if I suggested you
> came to the wrong place--the documentation clearly directs you here.
> Other files in the distribution, like man-pages-posix-2013-a.Announce,
> speak of "the Linux man-pages maintainer", and
> man-pages-posix-2013-a.lsm identifies Michael Kerrisk as the maintainer.
>
> > Also, I also wasn't able to find any mention of austingroupbugs.net
> > neither in man-pages-posix-2013-a/README nor at
> > https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages except for this
> > http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/changelog.html (at least using
> > Google's site: operator). Could this information be put somewhere?
>
> This is a good question for Michael.
Thank you for this explanation, it's clear that info in the tarball is
misleading.
> > That didn't work for me because /etc/groff/man.local is never opened:
>
> Hmm! What happens when you type "man --version"?
Actually, I have 2 man programs installed: /opt/man-db/bin/man which
is a part of man-db package and /usr/bin/man which is the default man
that Slackware comes with. Their versions are:
$ /usr/bin/man --version
man, version 1.6g
$ /opt/man-db/bin/man --version
man 2.8.4
I needed man-db because the default man had some problems with showing
manpages in Japanese:
https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/%60lang%3Dja_jp-utf-8-man-man%27-doesn%27t-work-4175606785/#post5715992. Not
that I can read Japanese, it was just a test.
Back to the point - neither /usr/bin/man nor /opt/man-db/bin/man look
for /etc/groff/man.local:
$ strace -f /usr/bin/man ./read.1p |& grep 'man.local'
[pid 24026] open("/home/ja/man.local", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
[pid 24026] open("/usr/lib64/groff/site-tmac/man.local", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
[pid 24026] open("/usr/share/groff/site-tmac/man.local", O_RDONLY) = 5
$ strace -f /opt/man-db/bin/man ./read.1p |& grep 'man.local'
[pid 24139] open("/home/ja/man.local", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
[pid 24139] open("/usr/lib64/groff/site-tmac/man.local", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
[pid 24139] open("/usr/share/groff/site-tmac/man.local", O_RDONLY) = 4
I think that /etc/groff is Debian addition:
http://soc.if.usp.br/manual/groff/README.Debian. Official
documentation in `man troff' says:
-mname
Read in the file name.tmac. If it isn't found, try tmac.name instead.
It will be first searched for in directories given with the -M command
line option, then in directories given in the GROFF_TMAC_PATH
environment variable, then in the current directory (only if in unsafe
mode), the home directory, /usr/lib64/groff/site-tmac,
/usr/share/groff/site-tmac, and /usr/share/groff/1.22.3/tmac.
> On my Debian-based system, even just running "nroff -man" over an
> (uncompressed) man page source file opens it
It does for me as well.
> > I have a hard time trying to understand the whole process and need
> > some reading on the subject.
>
> groff is the GNU implementation of a family of programming languages for
> (...)
Wow, fantastic explanation!
> Which distribution are you using?
Slackware 14.2.
> Does "echo $GROFF_TMAC_PATH" emit anything on your system?
No, it's not set.
--
Arkadiusz Drabczyk <arkadiusz@drabczyk.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-28 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-26 2:41 Error in read.1p Ian Hunter
2019-09-26 18:17 ` Arkadiusz Drabczyk
2019-09-26 18:23 ` Arkadiusz Drabczyk
2019-09-26 20:45 ` G. Branden Robinson
2019-09-27 12:27 ` Arkadiusz Drabczyk
2019-09-27 17:45 ` G. Branden Robinson
2019-09-28 19:35 ` Arkadiusz Drabczyk [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190928193506.GA21590@comp.lan \
--to=arkadiusz@drabczyk.org \
--cc=g.branden.robinson@gmail.com \
--cc=ian@ianhunter.me \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).