linux-man.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Errors in man pages, here: proc(5): Consistency
@ 2020-04-19  6:48 Helge Kreutzmann
  2020-04-19 20:25 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Helge Kreutzmann @ 2020-04-19  6:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mtk.manpages; +Cc: linux-man


Dear manpages maintainers.
the manpage-l10n project maintains a large number of translations of
man pages both from a large variety of sources (including manpages) as
well for a large variety of target languages.

During their work translators notice different possible issues in the
original (english) man pages. Sometiems this is a straightforward
typo, sometimes a hard to read sentence, sometimes this is a convention
not held up and sometimes we simply do not understand the original.

We use several distributions as sources and update regularly (at
least every 2 month). This means we are fairly recent (some
distributions like archlinux also update frequently) but might miss
the latest upstream version once a while, so the error might be
already fixed. We apologize and ask you to close the issue immediately
if this should be the case, but given the huge volume of projects and
the very limited number of volunteers we are not able to double check
each and every issue.

Secondly we translators see the manpages in the neutral po format,
i.e. converted and harmonized, but not the original source (be it man,
groff, xml or other). So we cannot provide a true patch (where
possible), but only an approximation which you need to translate into
your source format.

Finally the issues I'm reporting have accumulated over time and are
not always discovered by me, so sometimes my description of the
problem my be a bit limited - do not hesitate to ask so we can clarify
them.

I'm now reporting the errors for your project. As requested, each
issue is sent in an unique mail for easier tracking on your side. If
future reports should use another channel, please let me know.

**

Inconsistent spelling of multithreaded vs. multi-threaded

a)
"Prior to Linux 2.6.28, SELinux did not allow threads within a multi-threaded "
"process to set their security context via this node as it would yield an "
"inconsistency among the security contexts of the threads sharing the same "
"memory space.  Since Linux 2.6.28, SELinux lifted this restriction and began "
"supporting \"set\" operations for threads within a multithreaded process if "
"the new security context is bounded by the old security context, where the "
"bounded relation is defined in policy and guarantees that the new security "

b)
"In SELinux, this file is used to get the security context of a process.  "
"Prior to Linux 2.6.11, this file could not be used to set the security "
"context (a write was always denied), since SELinux limited process security "
"transitions to B<execve>(2)  (see the description of I</proc/[pid]/attr/"
"exec>, below).  Since Linux 2.6.11, SELinux lifted this restriction and "
"began supporting \"set\" operations via writes to this node if authorized by "
"policy, although use of this operation is only suitable for applications "


-- 
      Dr. Helge Kreutzmann                     debian@helgefjell.de
           Dipl.-Phys.                   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
        64bit GNU powered                     gpg signed mail preferred
           Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Errors in man pages, here: proc(5): Consistency
  2020-04-19  6:48 Errors in man pages, here: proc(5): Consistency Helge Kreutzmann
@ 2020-04-19 20:25 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
  2020-04-21 19:05   ` Helge Kreutzmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) @ 2020-04-19 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Helge Kreutzmann; +Cc: mtk.manpages, linux-man

On 4/19/20 8:48 AM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> 
> Dear manpages maintainers.
> the manpage-l10n project maintains a large number of translations of
> man pages both from a large variety of sources (including manpages) as
> well for a large variety of target languages.
> 
> During their work translators notice different possible issues in the
> original (english) man pages. Sometiems this is a straightforward
> typo, sometimes a hard to read sentence, sometimes this is a convention
> not held up and sometimes we simply do not understand the original.
> 
> We use several distributions as sources and update regularly (at
> least every 2 month). This means we are fairly recent (some
> distributions like archlinux also update frequently) but might miss
> the latest upstream version once a while, so the error might be
> already fixed. We apologize and ask you to close the issue immediately
> if this should be the case, but given the huge volume of projects and
> the very limited number of volunteers we are not able to double check
> each and every issue.
> 
> Secondly we translators see the manpages in the neutral po format,
> i.e. converted and harmonized, but not the original source (be it man,
> groff, xml or other). So we cannot provide a true patch (where
> possible), but only an approximation which you need to translate into
> your source format.
> 
> Finally the issues I'm reporting have accumulated over time and are
> not always discovered by me, so sometimes my description of the
> problem my be a bit limited - do not hesitate to ask so we can clarify
> them.
> 
> I'm now reporting the errors for your project. As requested, each
> issue is sent in an unique mail for easier tracking on your side. If
> future reports should use another channel, please let me know.
> 
> **
> 
> Inconsistent spelling of multithreaded vs. multi-threaded
> 
> a)
> "Prior to Linux 2.6.28, SELinux did not allow threads within a multi-threaded "
> "process to set their security context via this node as it would yield an "
> "inconsistency among the security contexts of the threads sharing the same "
> "memory space.  Since Linux 2.6.28, SELinux lifted this restriction and began "
> "supporting \"set\" operations for threads within a multithreaded process if "
> "the new security context is bounded by the old security context, where the "
> "bounded relation is defined in policy and guarantees that the new security "

Thanks. Fixed.


> b)
> "In SELinux, this file is used to get the security context of a process.  "
> "Prior to Linux 2.6.11, this file could not be used to set the security "
> "context (a write was always denied), since SELinux limited process security "
> "transitions to B<execve>(2)  (see the description of I</proc/[pid]/attr/"
> "exec>, below).  Since Linux 2.6.11, SELinux lifted this restriction and "
> "began supporting \"set\" operations via writes to this node if authorized by "
> "policy, although use of this operation is only suitable for applications "
> 

What is "b)" about?

Thanks,

Michael


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Errors in man pages, here: proc(5): Consistency
  2020-04-19 20:25 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
@ 2020-04-21 19:05   ` Helge Kreutzmann
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Helge Kreutzmann @ 2020-04-21 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Kerrisk (man-pages); +Cc: linux-man

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1778 bytes --]

Hello Michael,
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 10:25:13PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> > **
> > 
> > Inconsistent spelling of multithreaded vs. multi-threaded
> > 
> > a)
> > "Prior to Linux 2.6.28, SELinux did not allow threads within a multi-threaded "
> > "process to set their security context via this node as it would yield an "
> > "inconsistency among the security contexts of the threads sharing the same "
> > "memory space.  Since Linux 2.6.28, SELinux lifted this restriction and began "
> > "supporting \"set\" operations for threads within a multithreaded process if "
> > "the new security context is bounded by the old security context, where the "
> > "bounded relation is defined in policy and guarantees that the new security "
> 
> Thanks. Fixed.
> 
> 
> > b)
> > "In SELinux, this file is used to get the security context of a process.  "
> > "Prior to Linux 2.6.11, this file could not be used to set the security "
> > "context (a write was always denied), since SELinux limited process security "
> > "transitions to B<execve>(2)  (see the description of I</proc/[pid]/attr/"
> > "exec>, below).  Since Linux 2.6.11, SELinux lifted this restriction and "
> > "began supporting \"set\" operations via writes to this node if authorized by "
> > "policy, although use of this operation is only suitable for applications "
> > 
> 
> What is "b)" about?

Error on my side. Sorry. Please ignore.

Greetings

            Helge

-- 
      Dr. Helge Kreutzmann                     debian@helgefjell.de
           Dipl.-Phys.                   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
        64bit GNU powered                     gpg signed mail preferred
           Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-21 19:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-04-19  6:48 Errors in man pages, here: proc(5): Consistency Helge Kreutzmann
2020-04-19 20:25 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-04-21 19:05   ` Helge Kreutzmann

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).