On 2020-06-30, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > [CC += Aleksa, linux-man@] > > Hello Petr, > > I'm bringing Aleksa, the creator of the system call, into CC. > > Aleksa, the issue is that the header file () documented in > the manual page that you sent does not (yet) exist (and the bug > reporter therefore suggests that the manual page should say to include > . > > I'm guessing that there is (or was) a plan to add a header > file to glibc. What is the status? Yes, Florian asked me to put the openat2 definitions into a separate header (openat2.h) so that it could be just copied by glibc rather than having to do any more hacks around . I guess those plans haven't come to fruition yet? I'm fine with telling users to use in the meantime. > With best regards, > > Michael > > On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 16:17, pgajdos wrote: > > > > Hello Michael, > > > > https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173382 > > > > reporter proposes > > > > Index: man-pages-5.07/man2/openat2.2 > > =================================================================== > > --- man-pages-5.07.orig/man2/openat2.2 2020-06-09 14:45:54.000000000 +0200 > > +++ man-pages-5.07/man2/openat2.2 2020-06-30 16:07:09.655352702 +0200 > > @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ openat2 \- open and possibly create a fi > > .B #include > > .B #include > > .B #include > > -.B #include > > +.B #include > > .PP > > .BI "int openat2(int " dirfd ", const char *" pathname , > > .BI " struct open_how *" how ", size_t " size "); > > > > Thanks, > > Petr > > > > -- > > Have a lot of fun! -- Aleksa Sarai Senior Software Engineer (Containers) SUSE Linux GmbH