linux-man.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
To: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com>
Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, linux-man@vger.kernel.org,
	gcc@gcc.gnu.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] system_data_types.7: Add 'void *'
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 13:54:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51fd9c8d-9030-775f-8c35-f5e41bab4c0e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41ab7ed9-3ce0-f8ad-38f4-c4bbeca138f8@gmail.com>

Hi Alex,

On 10/1/20 6:55 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2020-10-01 18:38, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>>> +According to the C language standard,
>>> +a pointer to any object type may be converted to a pointer to
>>> +.I void
>>> +and back.
>>> +POSIX further requires that any pointer,
>>> +including pointers to functions,
>>> +may be converted to a pointer to
>>> +.I void
>>> +and back.
>> I know you are correct about POSIX, but which part of the
>> standard did you find this information in? The only
>> reference that I find in POSIX is the dlsym() spec. Is it
>> covered also somewhere else in the standrd?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Michael
>>
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> I've bean searching, and dlsym is the only one:
> 
> ________
> 
> user@debian:~/Desktop/src/Standards/susv4-2018$ grep -rn "pointer to a 
> function"
> functions/regfree.html:530:&quot;undefined&quot; means that the action 
> by the application is an error, of similar severity to passing a bad 
> pointer to a function.</p>
> functions/dlsym.html:138:<p>Note that conversion from a <b>void *</b> 
> pointer to a function pointer as in:</p>
> functions/regcomp.html:530:&quot;undefined&quot; means that the action 
> by the application is an error, of similar severity to passing a bad 
> pointer to a function.</p>
> functions/regexec.html:530:&quot;undefined&quot; means that the action 
> by the application is an error, of similar severity to passing a bad 
> pointer to a function.</p>
> functions/V2_chap02.html:3039:<p>There are three types of action that 
> can be associated with a signal: SIG_DFL, SIG_IGN, or a pointer to a 
> function. Initially,
> functions/regerror.html:530:&quot;undefined&quot; means that the action 
> by the application is an error, of similar severity to passing a bad 
> pointer to a function.</p>
> user@debian:~/Desktop/src/Standards/susv4-2018$ grep -rn "function pointer"
> basedefs/glob.h.html:165:"../functions/glob.html"><i>glob</i>()</a> 
> prototype definition by removing the <b>restrict</b> qualifier from the 
> function pointer
> xrat/V4_xsh_chap02.html:114:when the application requires it; for 
> example, if its address is to be stored in a function pointer variable.</p>
> functions/dlsym.html:138:<p>Note that conversion from a <b>void *</b> 
> pointer to a function pointer as in:</p>
> user@debian:~/Desktop/src/Standards/susv4-2018$ grep -rn "pointer to 
> function"
> functions/dlsym.html:73:converted from type pointer to function to type 
> pointer to <b>void</b>; otherwise, <i>dlsym</i>() shall return the 
> address of the
> user@debian:~/Desktop/src/Standards/susv4-2018$
> 
>  From those, the only one that documents this is functions/dlsym.
> The rest is noise.
> 
> The most explicit paragraph in dlsym is the following:
> 
> [[
> Note that conversion from a void * pointer to a function pointer as in:
> 
> fptr = (int (*)(int))dlsym(handle, "my_function");
> 
> is not defined by the ISO C standard.
> This standard requires this conversion to work correctly
> on conforming implementations.
> ]]

Okay -- so, one more thing for a revised (squashed) patch.
I think you better say that that POSIX requirements exists 
only since POS0X.1-2008 Technical Corrigendum 1 (2013).

Thanks,

Michael


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-02 11:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-01 15:06 [PATCH 0/2] Document void * Alejandro Colomar
2020-10-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] system_data_types.7: Add 'void *' Alejandro Colomar
2020-10-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] void-*.3: New link to system_data_types(7) Alejandro Colomar
2020-10-01 15:34 ` [PATCH 0/2] Document void * Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-10-01 15:40   ` Alejandro Colomar
2020-10-01 15:49     ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Document 'void *' Alejandro Colomar
2020-10-01 15:49     ` [PATCH v2 1/2] system_data_types.7: Add " Alejandro Colomar
2020-10-01 16:38       ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-10-01 16:55         ` Alejandro Colomar
2020-10-02 11:54           ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) [this message]
2020-10-08 13:52           ` Vincent Lefevre
2020-10-12  9:36             ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-10-01 17:32       ` Paul Eggert
2020-10-02  8:24         ` Alejandro Colomar
2020-10-02  8:48           ` Alejandro Colomar
2020-10-02 11:44             ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-10-02  9:10           ` David Laight
2020-10-02 17:00             ` Paul Eggert
2020-10-02 10:49           ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-10-02 11:31             ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-10-02 13:06               ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-10-02 13:20                 ` Alejandro Colomar
2020-10-02 13:27                   ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-10-02 13:51                     ` Alejandro Colomar
2020-10-03  8:00                       ` Navigational corrections (was: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] system_data_types.7: Add 'void *') Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-10-03  9:16                         ` Navigational corrections Alejandro Colomar
2020-10-03 11:39                           ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-10-05 22:08                             ` Alejandro Colomar
2020-10-07  6:53                               ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-10-01 15:49     ` [PATCH v2 2/2] void.3: New link to system_data_types(7) Alejandro Colomar
2020-10-02 13:19     ` [PATCH 0/2] Document void * Jonathan Wakely
2020-10-03 11:44       ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51fd9c8d-9030-775f-8c35-f5e41bab4c0e@gmail.com \
    --to=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).